Literature DB >> 28003313

Suicidal Risks in Reports of Long-Term Controlled Trials of Antidepressants for Major Depressive Disorder II.

Ross J Baldessarini1, Wai K Lau1, Jordan Sim1, Min Y Sum1, Kang Sim1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28003313      PMCID: PMC5408981          DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyw092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol        ISSN: 1461-1457            Impact factor:   5.176


× No keyword cloud information.
Professor Roland Dardennes and colleagues (2016) noted differences with respect to several numerical values included in our recent letter concerning suicidal risks in reports of randomized, long-term, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for major depressive disorder (Baldessarini et al. 2016), based on a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of such studies (Sim et al. 2015). We appreciate their efforts to improve accuracy in reporting findings from this complex body of studies. The noted numerical differences did not alter the conclusion that rates of suicidal behavior in such trials were surprisingly high. Nevertheless, their observations led us to re-review the reports cited in detail, with independent data-extraction by 2 senior investigators (R.J.B. and K.S.) working to consensus. We encountered findings that required some judgment to represent them fairly and found 5 additional reports to include. This process led to a revised tabulation of our findings from 17 long-term, placebo-controlled antidepressant trials (Table 1).
Table 1.

Suicidal Events in Long-term, Placebo-Controlled Treatment Trials for Major Depressive Disorder

Study Treatment Exposure (y) Dropout (%) Subjects (n) Ages (y) Suicidal Cases Incidence (cases/100 person-years)
Drug Placebo Drug Placebo Drug Placebo Drug Placebo
Rouillon et al. 1989 Maprotiline1.171.0035.876737446.0 (45.3–46.7)0/9/50/0/114/897 (1.56)1/374.0 (0.27)
Doogan and Caillard 1992 Sertraline1.020.8570.018511051.0 (19–78)a0/2/10/1/03/189 (1.59)1/93.5 (1.07)
Montgomery and Dunbar 1993 Paroxetine1.151.0044.8686747.1 (45.6–48.6)0/0/10/0/01/78.2 (1.28)0/67.0 (0.00)
Lauritzen et al. 1996 Paroxetineb0.580.5031.4181768.5 (66.0–71.0)0/0/10/0/11/10.4 (9.62)1/8.50 (11.8)
Versiani et al. 1999 Reboxetine0.960.8820.914514142.9 (41.5–44.3)0/0/10/0/01/139 (0.72)0/124 (0.00)
Rouillon et al. 2000 Milnacipran1.501.0058.010411046.6 (45.6–47.5)0/8/20/5/110/156 (6.41)6/110 (5.45)
Schmidt et al. 2000 Fluoxetine0.730.4846.237912241.5 (40.5–42.5)1/0/01/0/01/277 (0.36)1/58.6 (1.71)
Thase et al. 2001 Mirtazapine0.960.7765.6768039.8 (38.8–40.8)0/2/00/0/02/73.0 (2.74)0/61.6 (0.00)
Kornstein et al. 2006 Escitalopram1.461.0079.1736641.4 (40.2–42.6)0/0/00/1/00/107 (0.00)1/66.0 (1.52)
Perahia et al. 2006 Duloxetine0.730.5087.113614244.0 (43.1–44.9)0/3/10/0/04/99.3 (4.03)0/71.0 (0.00)
Keller et al. 2007 c Venlafaxine2.602.0040.5438644.3 (44.1–44.5)0/0/01/0/00/112 (0.00)1/172 (0.58)
Kocsis et al. 2007 c Venlafaxine1.691.0067.312912942.3 (42.2–42.4)1/0/01/0/01/218 (0.46)1/129 (0.78)
Kelin et al. 2010 Duloxetine1.651.0047.6646046.3 (45.0–47.6)0/0/00/0/00/106 (0.00)0/60.0 (0.00)
Liebowitz et al. 2010 Quetiapine1.401.0099.238738443.5 (42.8–44.1)9/0/01/0/09/542 (1.66)1/384 (0.26)
Yildiz et al. 2010 Sertralineb0.350.3565.2361645.4 (25–64)a4/0/00/0/04/12.6 (31.8)0/5.60 (0.00)
Boulenger et al. 2012 Vortioxetine1.461.2364.220419244.7 (43.9–45.5)1/1/00/0/02/298 (0.67)0/236 (0.00)
Rosenthal et al. 2013 Desvenlafaxine0.880.3855.827227645.9 (44.8–47.0)76/5/022/0/081/239 (33.9)22/105 (21.0)
Totals/means17 trials 1.19 0.88 57.63086 2372 46.0 92/30/12 26/7/3 134/3552 (3.77)d 36/2126 (1.69)d
(95% CI)(0.92–1.47)(0.68–1.08)(47.1–68.1)(42.7–49.2)(134)(36)(3.07–4.31)(1.21–2.38)

The 17 trials included 5458 depressed subjects.

aRange.

bAlso given ECT in both trial-arms.

cEarly and late phases of the same trial.

dBased on sum of individual patient-year exposures; pooled rates differ highly significantly (r2=17.2, P<.0001), but means of individual studies: drug = 5.69 (CI: 0.27–11.1), placebo = 2.61 (0.00–5.49) cases/100 person-years do not (t=1.06, P=.30). Overall rates (drug+placebo arms): ideation = 118/5678 = 2.08 (CI: 1.72–2.48); attempts: 37/5678 = 0.652 (0.459–0.897); suicides: 15/5678 = 0.264 (0.148–0.435) cases/100 person-years (or 264/y/100000 [148–435]). Rates for suicides+attempts differ significantly between antidepressant- (0.740 [0.534–0.999] %/y) and placebo-treated subjects (0.176 [0.084–0.324] %/y; r2=19.8, P<.0001). Mean exposure adjusted by one-half for trials with dropout rates of ≥50% = 0.857 (0.668–1.05) years for antidepressants and 0.641 (0.415–0.867) for placebo, leading to an adjusted rate of suicides of 15/4165 = 0.360 (0.207–0.593) suicides/person-year (360/y/100,000 [CI: 207–593]). Mean ages are similar across trials and similar in treatment-arms randomized to drug vs placebo.

Suicidal Events in Long-term, Placebo-Controlled Treatment Trials for Major Depressive Disorder The 17 trials included 5458 depressed subjects. aRange. bAlso given ECT in both trial-arms. cEarly and late phases of the same trial. dBased on sum of individual patient-year exposures; pooled rates differ highly significantly (r2=17.2, P<.0001), but means of individual studies: drug = 5.69 (CI: 0.27–11.1), placebo = 2.61 (0.00–5.49) cases/100 person-years do not (t=1.06, P=.30). Overall rates (drug+placebo arms): ideation = 118/5678 = 2.08 (CI: 1.72–2.48); attempts: 37/5678 = 0.652 (0.459–0.897); suicides: 15/5678 = 0.264 (0.148–0.435) cases/100 person-years (or 264/y/100000 [148-435]). Rates for suicides+attempts differ significantly between antidepressant- (0.740 [0.534–0.999] %/y) and placebo-treated subjects (0.176 [0.084–0.324] %/y; r2=19.8, P<.0001). Mean exposure adjusted by one-half for trials with dropout rates of ≥50% = 0.857 (0.668–1.05) years for antidepressants and 0.641 (0.415–0.867) for placebo, leading to an adjusted rate of suicides of 15/4165 = 0.360 (0.207–0.593) suicides/person-year (360/y/100,000 [CI: 207–593]). Mean ages are similar across trials and similar in treatment-arms randomized to drug vs placebo. Revised overall incidence rates (% of persons/y) with all treatments were: suicidal ideation, 2.08 (CI: 1.72–2.48); suicide attempts, 0.652 (0.459–0.897); suicides, 0.264 (0.148–0.435) (Table 1). Of note, these overall rates of suicidal subjects were significantly greater with antidepressants vs placebos (Table 1). This separation also obtained for attempts and suicides combined (0.740 vs 0.176; P<.0001) (Table 1). The observed overall suicide rate (264/y/100000) in these trials for initially acutely depressed subjects is 18–26-times higher than international general population rates of 10–15/year/100000, and about 5.3 times that in clinical samples of patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder in various states of illness and recovery (50/year/100000; Tondo et al., 2007). If exposure times are adjusted for studies with high dropout of one-half or more of the participants to one-half of the nominal or maximum times, then the observed overall rate of suicides is even higher (360/y/100000), approximately 29 times above general population rates and 7.2 times higher than in clinical samples of patients with major depressive disorder. Also of note, the ratio of attempts/suicides of 2.47 (652/264) is far lower than in the general population (approximately 30) and lower than in clinic samples of major depression patients (approximately 5), suggesting greater lethality of attempts in trials (Tondo et al., 2007). Such observed rates of suicidal events in long-term controlled trials of antidepressants may be misleading but support the hypothesis that suicidal risks in controlled treatment trials for depression are substantial and require further research. Most long-term antidepressant trials do not even comment on suicidal events, and those that do appear to consider them as passively acquired, incidental examples of adverse events (Sim et al., 2015; Baldessarini et al., 2016). In addition, the few reports with some data concerning suicidal behavior may involve unrepresentative, selective reporting of suicidal acts (attempts and suicides). Moreover, suicidal ideation almost certainly is unevenly and probably severely underreported, given the wide range of rates, and there is even lack of noting ideation despite occurrence of attempts or suicides (Table 1). The greater observed risks associated with antidepressant treatment are particularly surprising in view of the greater risk of depressive relapses of recurrences in placebo arms of the reported trials and the adverse effects of antidepressant discontinuation (Baldessarini et al., 2010, 2015). The apparently greater suicidal risks with antidepressant treatment may reflect greater exposure of antidepressant- than placebo-treated subjects: 30% greater numbers (3086/2372) and 35% longer observation times (1.19/0.88 years), which in most trials included several months of open-label and stabilization phases involving antidepressant but not placebo treatment. In addition, dropout and relapse rates were consistently greater in placebo arms of trials: among 5 reports with flow charts to account for the dispositions of all subjects and treatments (Kornstein et al., 2006; Parahia et al., 2006; Keller et al., 2007; Kelin et al., 2010; Liebowitz et al., 2010; Rosenthal et al., 2013), rates of early loss averaged 56.6% (554/979) with antidepressants vs 64.3% (653/1016) with placebos (χ2=12.3, P=.0004). It seems likely that longer exposure times and larger samples as well as somewhat lower dropout rates with active treatment would tend to favor encountering uncommon suicidal events more among antidepressant-treated subjects. On the other hand, the designs of many of the trials involving treatment-discontinuation-to-placebo among patients recovering from acute major depression might tend to increase suicidal risk with placebo treatment (Baldessarini et al., 2015). In conclusion, suicides and attempts rather than suicidal ideation are relatively reliable outcomes to be more routinely documented, reported, and compared with other epidemiological studies. Scientific and editorial policies regarding reporting of therapeutic trials should routinely include such data with denominators that include actual exposure times and subject counts in each treatment arm. These recommendations are strongly supported by the present findings, suggesting that such events are surprisingly prevalent even in trials that attempt to exclude currently suicidal participants. They also suggest that special precautions are warranted in monitoring trial participants with major depressive illnesses, especially when antidepressant treatment is discontinued for prolonged times.

Statement of Interest

None.
  23 in total

1.  The efficacy and safety of a new enteric-coated formulation of fluoxetine given once weekly during the continuation treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  M E Schmidt; M Fava; J M Robinson; R Judge
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  A randomized clinical study of Lu AA21004 in the prevention of relapse in patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Boulenger; Henrik Loft; Ioana Florea
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 4.153

3.  Suicidal risks among 2826 Sardinian major affective disorder patients.

Authors:  L Tondo; B Lepri; R J Baldessarini
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.392

4.  Sertraline in the prevention of depression.

Authors:  D P Doogan; V Caillard
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.319

5.  Combination of pharmacotherapy with electroconvulsive therapy in prevention of depressive relapse: a pilot controlled trial.

Authors:  Ayşegül Yildiz; Atil Mantar; Selçuk Simsek; Elif Onur; Necati Gökmen; Hüray Fidaner
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.635

6.  Efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d for prevention of relapse in major depressive disorder:a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joshua Z Rosenthal; Patrice Boyer; Cécile Vialet; Eunhee Hwang; Karen A Tourian
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.384

7.  The Prevention of Recurrent Episodes of Depression with Venlafaxine for Two Years (PREVENT) Study: Outcomes from the 2-year and combined maintenance phases.

Authors:  Martin B Keller; Madhukar H Trivedi; Michael E Thase; Richard C Shelton; Susan G Kornstein; Charles B Nemeroff; Edward S Friedman; Alan J Gelenberg; James H Kocsis; David L Dunner; Robert M A Hirschfeld; Anthony J Rothschild; James M Ferguson; Alan F Schatzberg; John M Zajecka; Ronald D Pedersen; Bing Yan; Saeeduddin Ahmed; Jeff Musgnung; Philip T Ninan
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  Prevention of recurrent episodes of depression with venlafaxine ER in a 1-year maintenance phase from the PREVENT Study.

Authors:  James H Kocsis; Michael E Thase; Madhukar H Trivedi; Richard C Shelton; Susan G Kornstein; Charles B Nemeroff; Edward S Friedman; Alan J Gelenberg; David L Dunner; Robert M A Hirschfeld; Anthony J Rothschild; James M Ferguson; Alan F Schatzberg; John M Zajecka; Ronald D Pedersen; Bing Yan; Saeed Ahmed; Jeff Musgnung; Philip T Ninan; Martin B Keller
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 9.  Suicidal Risks in Reports of Long-Term Treatment Trials for Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Ross J Baldessarini; Wai Keat Lau; Jordan Sim; Min Yi Sum; Kang Sim
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2015-09-13       Impact factor: 5.176

Review 10.  Prevention of Relapse and Recurrence in Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Kang Sim; Wai Keat Lau; Jordan Sim; Min Yi Sum; Ross J Baldessarini
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.176

View more
  8 in total

1.  Implementing Mobile HRV Biofeedback as Adjunctive Therapy During Inpatient Psychiatric Rehabilitation Facilitates Recovery of Depressive Symptoms and Enhances Autonomic Functioning Short-Term: A 1-Year Pre-Post-intervention Follow-Up Pilot Study.

Authors:  Josef M Tatschl; Sigurd M Hochfellner; Andreas R Schwerdtfeger
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Treatment Strategies, Evaluating the Meaningfulness of HAM-D Rating Scale in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Junaid Asghar; Madiha Tabasam; Maha M Althobaiti; Amal Adnan Ashour; Mohammed A Aleid; Osamah Ibrahim Khalaf; Theyazn H H Aldhyani
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 5.435

3.  Music Therapy for Depression Enhanced With Listening Homework and Slow Paced Breathing: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jaakko Erkkilä; Olivier Brabant; Martin Hartmann; Anastasios Mavrolampados; Esa Ala-Ruona; Nerdinga Snape; Suvi Saarikallio; Christian Gold
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-16

4.  Antidepressant Use During Acute Inpatient Care Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Psychiatric Rehospitalisation Over a 12-Month Follow-Up After Discharge.

Authors:  Michael P Hengartner; Silvia Passalacqua; Andreas Andreae; Thomas Heinsius; Urs Hepp; Wulf Rössler; Agnes von Wyl
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 5.  Methodological Flaws, Conflicts of Interest, and Scientific Fallacies: Implications for the Evaluation of Antidepressants' Efficacy and Harm.

Authors:  Michael P Hengartner
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior as Rare Adverse Events of Antidepressant Medication: Current Report from the AMSP Multicenter Drug Safety Surveillance Project.

Authors:  Susanne Stübner; Renate Grohmann; Waldemar Greil; Xueqiong Zhang; Bruno Müller-Oerlinghausen; Stefan Bleich; Eckart Rüther; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Rolf Engel; Peter Falkai; Sermin Toto; Siegfried Kasper; Alexandra Neyazi
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 5.176

7.  Statistically Significant Antidepressant-Placebo Differences on Subjective Symptom-Rating Scales Do Not Prove That the Drugs Work: Effect Size and Method Bias Matter!

Authors:  Michael P Hengartner; Martin Plöderl
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Major Depression and the Degree of Suicidality: Results of the European Group for the Study of Resistant Depression (GSRD).

Authors:  Markus Dold; Lucie Bartova; Gernot Fugger; Alexander Kautzky; Daniel Souery; Julien Mendlewicz; George N Papadimitriou; Dimitris Dikeos; Panagiotis Ferentinos; Stefano Porcelli; Alessandro Serretti; Joseph Zohar; Stuart Montgomery; Siegfried Kasper
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.176

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.