Literature DB >> 28000800

Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer in the elderly.

L August Clark1, Walter R Peters1.   

Abstract

Recent published trials have failed to demonstrate that laparoscopic resection is not inferior to open resection of rectal cancer in terms of pathologic outcomes. However, there have been numerous studies showing the benefit of laparoscopic resection in terms of short-term complications and quality of life. Fewer complications and shorter hospital stays improve the chance of maintaining functional status, which is very important for the elderly population. Thus, laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer remains a viable option for the elderly.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28000800      PMCID: PMC5023314          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2016.11929504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  14 in total

1.  Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.

Authors:  Marylise Boutros; Neha Hippalgaonkar; Emanuela Silva; Daniela Allende; Steven D Wexner; Mariana Berho
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection versus open colorectal resection in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Y Li; S Wang; S Gao; C Yang; W Yang; S Guo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection.

Authors:  Pedro Luna-Pérez; Efraín Bustos-Cholico; Isabel Alvarado; Antonio Maffuz; Saúl Rodríguez-Ramírez; Marcos Gutiérrez de la Barrera; Sonia Labastida
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A population-based comparison of open versus minimally invasive abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Andrew T Schlussel; Michael B Lustik; Eric K Johnson; Justin A Maykel; Brad J Champagne; Joel E Goldberg; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  The outcome of hospitalization for acute illness in the elderly.

Authors:  C T Lamont; S Sampson; R Matthias; R Kane
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Quality of life after laparoscopic vs open sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Simon Siu-Man Ng; Wing-Wa Leung; Cherry Yee-Ni Wong; Sophie Sok-Fei Hon; Tony Wing-Chung Mak; Dennis Kwok-Yu Ngo; Janet Fung-Yee Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Andrew R L Stevenson; Michael J Solomon; John W Lumley; Peter Hewett; Andrew D Clouston; Val J Gebski; Lucy Davies; Kate Wilson; Wendy Hague; John Simes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Seung-Yong Jeong; Ji Won Park; Byung Ho Nam; Sohee Kim; Sung-Bum Kang; Seok-Byung Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Duck-Woo Kim; Hee Jin Chang; Dae Yong Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Tae-You Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang; Eui Kyu Chie; Sun Young Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Dae-Hyun Kim; Jae-Sung Kim; Hye Seung Lee; Jee Hyun Kim; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  B L Green; H C Marshall; F Collinson; P Quirke; P Guillou; D G Jayne; J M Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.