Literature DB >> 28000165

Patient Satisfaction with Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Care.

Pablo F Recinos1,2, Cheryl J Dunphy3, Nicolas Thompson1, Jesse Schuschu1, John L Urchek3, Irene L Katzan4,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Systematic collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) during ambulatory clinic visits can enhance communication between patient and provider, and provide the ability to evaluate outcomes of care. Little is known about patient satisfaction of PROM data collection in routine clinical care. To evaluate patient reaction to the routine collection of PROMs in the ambulatory setting.
METHODS: Before all ambulatory clinic visits at our neurological institute, patients electronically complete health status questionnaires. We administered an 8-question patient satisfaction survey to a sample of patients seen across the institute after their clinical visit.
RESULTS: Of 343 patients approached, 323 agreed to participate. The majority responded that the questionnaire system was easy to use, was an appropriate length, and benefited their care overall (strongly agree or agree = 92.3%, 87.6%, and 77.3%, respectively). Provider review of the PROMs with the patient during the clinic visit was associated with significantly higher positive responses to all questions, even those regarding logistical aspects of the collection process. There were significant age and race differences in response to perceived benefit: those in the Black/other race category had a markedly lower probability of viewing the process favorably with increasing age.
CONCLUSIONS: Systematic collection of PROMs via an electronic questionnaire appears to be well accepted by patients. A minority of patients did not feel the questionnaire content applied to their appointment or that the system was a beneficial feature of the clinical practice. The provider can significantly improve the patient's perception of PROM collection and the patient-physician encounter by reviewing the questionnaire results with the patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical research; Electronic survey; Patient satisfaction; Patient-reported outcome measures

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28000165     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-016-0463-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  14 in total

1.  Long-term evolution of patient-reported outcome measures in spinocerebellar ataxias.

Authors:  Heike Jacobi; Sophie Tezenas du Montcel; Peter Bauer; Paola Giunti; Arron Cook; Robyn Labrum; Michael H Parkinson; Alexandra Durr; Alexis Brice; Perrine Charles; Cecilia Marelli; Caterina Mariotti; Lorenzo Nanetti; Lidia Sarro; Maria Rakowicz; Anna Sulek; Anna Sobanska; Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch; Ludger Schöls; Holger Hengel; Laszlo Baliko; Bela Melegh; Alessandro Filla; Antonella Antenora; Jon Infante; José Berciano; Bart P van de Warrenburg; Dagmar Timmann; Sandra Szymanski; Sylvia Boesch; Wolfgang Nachbauer; Jun-Suk Kang; Massimo Pandolfo; Jörg B Schulz; Audrey Tanguy Melac; Alhassane Diallo; Thomas Klockgether
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  CORR Insights®: What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions?

Authors:  Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Breast Surgical Oncology: Advancing Toward Value-Based Care.

Authors:  Mirelle Lagendijk; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Tari A King; Christopher Gibbons; Andrea Pusic; Laura S Dominici
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-12-17

Review 4.  Key design and analysis principles for quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Riha Vaidya; John L Gore
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  PROMIS global health: potential utility as a screener to trigger construct-specific patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care.

Authors:  Brittany Lapin; Irene L Katzan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.440

6.  Preoperative nonmedical predictors of functional impairment after brain tumor surgery.

Authors:  Silvia Schiavolin; Arianna Mariniello; Morgan Broggi; Francesco DiMeco; Paolo Ferroli; Matilde Leonardi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 3.359

7.  Patient-reported experience with patient-reported outcome measures in adult patients seen in rheumatology clinics.

Authors:  Brittany R Lapin; Ryan Honomichl; Nicolas Thompson; Susannah Rose; Abby Abelson; Chad Deal; Irene L Katzan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Measurement properties of the most commonly used Foot- and Ankle-Specific Questionnaires: the FFI, FAOS and FAAM. A systematic review.

Authors:  I N Sierevelt; R Zwiers; W Schats; D Haverkamp; C B Terwee; P A Nolte; G M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Validating the VR-12 Physical Function Instrument After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with SF-12, PROMIS, and NDI.

Authors:  Nathaniel W Jenkins; James M Parrish; Michael T Nolte; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-11-09

10.  Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Acute Symptomatic Seizure (ASyS) Versus Patients With Established Epilepsy.

Authors:  Christopher R Newey; Nicolas R Thompson; Pravin George; Vineet Punia; Stephen Hantus; Brittany Lapin; Joao Gomes; Irene Katzan
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2020-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.