| Literature DB >> 27999566 |
Vineeta Singh1, Shafiul Haque2, Harshita Singh3, Jyoti Verma3, Kumari Vibha3, Rajbir Singh4, Arshad Jawed5, C K M Tripathi6.
Abstract
The search for novel bioactive compounds from the natural environment has rapidly been gaining momentum with the increase in multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens. In the present study, the antimicrobial potential of novel actinomycetes has been evaluated by initial screening of six soil samples. Primary and secondary screening was performed against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Trichophyton rubrum, and other MDR bacterial and fungal test strains, thirteen active isolates were selected for further study. Microbial strains were identified on the basis of growth conditions and other biochemical characters. Five most active microbial strains were identified using 16S rRNA sequence homology and designated as Streptomyces xanthophaeus MTCC 11938, Streptomyces variabilis MTCC 12266, Streptomyces xanthochromogenes MTCC 11937, Streptomyces levis EU 124569, and Streptomyces sp. NCIM 5500. Four antibacterial and three antifungal compounds isolated from the above five isolates were purified and partially characterized using UV absorption and IR spectra. Two antibacterial metabolites, belong to chromone and peptide antibiotic, respectively. The antifungal compounds were found to be of non-polyene nature. In conclusion, we study the isolation of novel bacterial strains of actinomycetes for producing novel compounds having antibacterial and antifungal activities from the unexplored agro-ecological niches of India. Also, this study paves the way for further characterization of these isolates of Streptomyces sp. for their optimum utilization for antimicrobial purposes.Entities:
Keywords: Streptomyces sp.; antibiotic production; antimicrobial activity; chromone antibiotics; non-polyenes
Year: 2016 PMID: 27999566 PMCID: PMC5138215 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01921
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Primary screening using perpendicular streak method for antibacterial and antifungal activity of the soil isolate (ZA25).
Secondary screening (antibacterial activity).
| 1 | 16 | 16 | 13 | 27 | 22 | 23 | 21 | – | – | 20 | 17 | 25 | 12 | 13 | 11 | 30 | |
| 2 | 16 | 16 | – | 17 | 16 | 19 | 19 | – | – | 17 | 16 | 25 | – | 12 | – | 30 | |
| 3 | 21 | 21 | 18 | 25 | 21 | 26 | 15 | 13 | – | – | 17 | 30 | – | – | – | – | |
| 4 | 23 | 17 | – | 20 | 17 | 25 | 24 | – | 24 | 24 | 20 | 21 | – | 13 | 11 | 25 | |
| 5 | – | – | – | 14 | 17 | – | – | 12 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 30 | – | 14 | 11 | 17 | |
| 6 | – | – | – | – | 12 | 16 | – | – | – | 19 | 17 | – | – | – | – | 20 | |
| 7 | – | – | 13 | 27 | 15 | 18 | 27 | – | 20 | 20 | 15 | 28 | – | – | 37 | ||
| 8 | 16 | 16 | – | 15 | 18 | – | – | 14 | – | 14 | 18 | 30 | – | 12 | – | 12 | |
| 9 | – | – | – | 15 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 12 | – | 16 | 16 | 29 | – | – | – | 13 | |
| 10 | 15 | 14 | – | 16 | 17 | 18 | – | 12 | 23 | 17 | 15 | 25 | – | – | – | – | |
(−), not active; PC, Positive Control; E.
Secondary screening (antifungal activity).
| 1. | 16 | 15 | – | – | – | – | – | 11 | 12 | – | 12 | – | 12 | – | – | 25 | |
| 2. | 30 | 30 | 15 | 14 | – | 27 | 19 | 18 | 11 | – | 18 | – | – | – | – | 25 | |
| 3. | 14 | 11 | – | – | – | 13 | – | 18 | – | – | 21 | – | – | – | – | 20 | |
| 4. | 25 | 25 | – | – | – | 19 | – | 15 | – | – | 16 | – | – | – | – | 12 | |
| 5. | 21 | 23 | – | – | – | 25 | 28 | 20 | – | – | 23 | – | 11 | 11 | – | 20 | |
| 6. | 27 | 24 | – | – | 21 | 21 | 31 | 20 | – | – | 29 | – | 13 | 13 | – | 12 | |
| 8. | 19 | 11 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 20 | – | – | – | 13 | – | |
| 9. | – | 12 | 12 | – | – | 12 | 13 | – | – | – | 14 | – | – | – | 15 | – | |
| 11. | – | – | – | – | 18 | 16 | 14 | 12 | – | – | 20 | – | – | 13 | 12 | 32 | |
| 12. | 16 | 20 | 20 | 11 | – | – | 19 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
(−), not active; PC, positive control; AmB, Amphotericin B and well diameter = 10 mm.
Figure 2(A) Secondary screening of the soil isolates for the antibacterial activities. (B) Secondary screening of the soil isolates for the antifungal activities.
Cultural and Biochemical characteristics of the producer strains.
| Growth on | ISP2 | 2+ | + | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | + | 2+ | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 3+ | – | 3+ |
| ISP3 | 2+ | + | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | 3+ | – | 2+ | 2+ | |
| ISP4 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 3+ | + | 2+ | 3+ | – | 3+ | 3+ | |
| ISP5 | 2+ | 2+ | + | 2+ | + | + | 2+ | + | + | 2+ | – | 2+ | 2+ | |
| ISP6 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | 2+ | + | + | + | 2+ | 2+ | + | + | 2+ | |
| ISP7 | + | 2+ | + | + | + | + | 3+ | 2+ | 3+ | 2+ | + | – | + | |
| Utilization of | Citrate | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | – | – | – |
| Asparagine | 3+ | 2+ | + | – | 2+ | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | |
| Oat meal | 2+ | + | 2+ | – | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | 3+ | – | 2+ | 2+ | |
| Tributyrin | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | + | – | – | – | + | – | + | + | |
| Enzyme production | Urease | – | – | − | − | − | + | − | 2+ | − | + | − | − | + |
| Amylase | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | 2+ | 3+ | + | 2+ | 3+ | − | 3+ | 3+ | |
| Tyrosinase | 3+ | 2+ | − | + | + | + | 3+ | 2+ | 3+ | 2+ | + | − | + | |
| Chitinase | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | + | − | − | 3+ | + | + | − | − | + | |
| Heparinase | − | − | − | − | 3+ | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| Protease | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | + | 2+ | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 3+ | + | 3+ | |
| Catalase | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | + | + | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | 2+ | + | + | |
| pH tolerance | 5 | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ |
| 7 | 3+ | 2+ | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | + | 2+ | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | + | + | 3+ | |
| 9 | 2+ | 3+ | + | 3+ | 3+ | + | + | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | + | 3+ | |
| 11 | − | 2+ | + | 2+ | 3+ | + | + | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | + | + | 2+ | |
| NaCl tolerance | 1% | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | + | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | + | 3+ |
| 3% | + | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | 3+ | − | + | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | − | + | + | |
| 5% | − | − | + | 2+ | 2+ | − | − | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | − | − | + | |
| 7% | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | + | 3+ | + | − | − | − | |
| Growth at | 28°C | 3+ | 2+ | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | + | 2+ | 3+ | + | 3+ | + | + | 3+ |
| 37°C | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | + | 3+ | + | − | 3+ | |
| 47°C | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
(−), No growth; (+1), Poor growth; (+2), Moderate growth; (+3), Heavy growth.
Figure 3Phylogenetic tree showing evolutionary relationship of the soil isolates.
IR spectra of bioactive compounds isolated from the selected actinomycetes strains.
| H1F1 | Antibacterial | 201, 260 | 3409, 3019, 2400, 1658, 1402, 1384, 1215, 1053, 948, 758, 668 | |
| ZA25F1 | Antibacterial | 264, 495 | 3411, 3019, 2400, 1647, 1403, 1070, 928, 669 | |
| V1 | Antibacterial | 210 | 3412, 2928, 1646, 1215, 1070, | |
| RS25 | Antibacterial | 240-250 and 332 | 3425 and 1648, 3020 and 2927, 1602 and 1504 cm−1 | |
| S1 | Antifungal | 205, 490 | 3411, 3020, 1646, 1403, 1385, 1216, 1069, 769 | |
| H1F2 | Antifungal | 201, 265 | 3850, 3431, 3020, 2399, 2110, 1637, 1403, 1385, 1017, 669 | |
| ZA25F2 | Antifungal | 205, 248, 263, | 3850, 3366, 2945, 2833, 2518, 2042, 1638, 1449, 1218, 1113, 757, 666 |