| Literature DB >> 27999410 |
Virginia Chamorro1,2,3, Rachele Pandolfi4,5,6, Laura Moreno7,8,9, Bianca Barreira10,11, Andrea Martínez-Ramas12,13, Daniel Morales-Cano14,15,16, Jesús Ruiz-Cabello17,18, José Angel Lorente19,20,21, Juan Duarte22,23, Ángel Cogolludo24,25,26, José Luis Alvarez-Sala27,28, Francisco Perez-Vizcaino29,30,31.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that treatment with quercetin could result in improved hemodynamics, lung inflammatory parameters and mortality in a rat model of hemorrhagic shock.Entities:
Keywords: hemorrhage; lung edema; reperfusion; systemic arterial pressure; trauma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27999410 PMCID: PMC6273949 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21121739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier survival analysis during the reperfusion period. Anaesthetized animals were submitted to shock and at time 90 they were reperfused with blood plus lactate Ringer and with vehicle or quercetin, and followed for an additional period of 90 min. * p < 0.05 vs. sham (log-rank test).
Figure 2Changes in (A) mean arterial blood pressure and (B) heart rate in the three experimental groups. Rats were subjected to laparotomy followed by controlled hypotension (shock phase) and then by resuscitation with lactate Ringer solution, shed blood and the quercetin or vehicle. Data are shown as the mean ± S.E.M. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 vs. sham group during reperfusion (Dunnett’s test).
Figure 3aSMase activity. Measurements were made in lung homogenate for a total time of 30 min expressed as nmol/min/mL. * p < 0.05 vs. sham group. Box-and-whisker plot showing medians with interquartile range and minimum and maximum values.
Figure 4Arterial blood gases. (A) Values of pH; (B) carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2); (C) excess base; (D) bicarbonate (HCO3−); (E) total carbon dioxide concentration (TCO2); (F) arterial oxygen saturation (SO2) and (G) arterial oxygen partial pressure (pO2) in the sham, shock and shock + quercetin at 180 min (at the end of reperfusion). Box-and-whisker plot showing medians with interquartile range and minimum and maximum values. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 vs. sham group.
Electrolytes, hematocrit and hemoglobin (Hb).
| Group | Shock Phase ( | Reperfusion ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na | K | Ca | Hb | Hematocrit | Na | K | Ca | Hb | Hematocrit | |
| Sham | 137.4 ± 0.82 | 5.30 ± 0.13 | 1.28 ± 0.05 | 13.38 ± 0.37 | 39.40 ± 1.07 | 137.0 ± 2.84 | 5.10 ± 0.16 | 1.19 ± 0.11 | 12.62 ± 0.33 | 37.11 ± 0.95 |
| Shock | 132.0 ** ± 0.85 | 6.33 ** ± 0.26 | 1.18 ± 0.12 | 9.50 ** ± 0.50 | 27.88 ** ± 1.47 | 131.79 ± 2.37 | 5.84 ± 0.17 | 0.95 ± 0.09 | 11.59 ± 0.37 | 34.07 ± 1.09 |
| Shock + quercetin | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | 133.36 ± 1.52 | 5.40 ± 0.17 | 1.18 ± 0.12 | 12.93 ± 0.42 | 38.00 ± 1.22 |
** p < 0.01 vs. sham (Student’s t test). The one-way Anova indicated no significant differences during reperfusion.
Figure 5Markers of inflammation and vascular permeability: (A) Edema (wet to dry weight ratio); (B) proteins in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid (BALF); (C) IgM BALF/plasma ratio (D) cells in BALF; (E) Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and (F) IL-6 in BALF measured at the end of reperfusion. Box-and-whisker plot showing medians with interquartile range and minimum and maximum values in each group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.005 vs. sham group.