Nicholas S Britt1,2, Nimish Patel3, Theresa I Shireman2, Wissam I El Atrouni4, Rebecca T Horvat5, Molly E Steed6. 1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Kansas School of Pharmacy, 2010 Becker Drive, Lawrence, KS, USA. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, USA. 3. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 106 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Kansas School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, USA. 5. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, USA. 6. Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Kansas School of Pharmacy, 2010 Becker Drive, Lawrence, KS, USA msteed@kumc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous data have demonstrated the clinical importance of vancomycin MIC values in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB); however, the impact of vancomycin tolerance (VT) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To compare the frequency of clinical failure between patients with VT and non-VT isolates in SAB. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with SAB, excluding treatment <48 h or polymicrobial bacteraemia. The primary outcome was clinical failure (composite of 30 day mortality, non-resolving signs and symptoms, and 60 day recurrence). Vancomycin MIC and MBC were determined by broth microdilution. The association between VT (MBC/MIC ≥32) and clinical failure was evaluated by multivariable Poisson regression. RESULTS: Of the 225 patients, 26.7% had VT isolates. VT was associated with clinical failure (48.0% overall) in unadjusted analysis [68.3% (n = 41/60) versus 40.6% (n = 67/165); P < 0.001] and this relationship persisted in multivariable analysis (adjusted risk ratio, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.36-2.24; P < 0.001). The association between VT and clinical failure was also consistent within strata of methicillin susceptibility [methicillin susceptible (n = 125, risk ratio, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.20-2.32; P = 0.002); methicillin resistant (n = 100, risk ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.14-2.51; P = 0.010)]. Among methicillin-susceptible SAB cases treated with β-lactam therapy, VT remained associated with clinical failure (risk ratio, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.19-2.61; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: VT was associated with clinical failure in SAB, irrespective of methicillin susceptibility or definitive treatment. VT may decrease the effectiveness of cell-wall-active therapy or be a surrogate marker of some other pathogen-specific factor associated with poor outcomes. Future research should evaluate if bactericidal non-cell-wall-active agents improve outcomes in VT SAB.
BACKGROUND: Previous data have demonstrated the clinical importance of vancomycin MIC values in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB); however, the impact of vancomycin tolerance (VT) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To compare the frequency of clinical failure between patients with VT and non-VT isolates in SAB. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with SAB, excluding treatment <48 h or polymicrobial bacteraemia. The primary outcome was clinical failure (composite of 30 day mortality, non-resolving signs and symptoms, and 60 day recurrence). Vancomycin MIC and MBC were determined by broth microdilution. The association between VT (MBC/MIC ≥32) and clinical failure was evaluated by multivariable Poisson regression. RESULTS: Of the 225 patients, 26.7% had VT isolates. VT was associated with clinical failure (48.0% overall) in unadjusted analysis [68.3% (n = 41/60) versus 40.6% (n = 67/165); P < 0.001] and this relationship persisted in multivariable analysis (adjusted risk ratio, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.36-2.24; P < 0.001). The association between VT and clinical failure was also consistent within strata of methicillin susceptibility [methicillin susceptible (n = 125, risk ratio, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.20-2.32; P = 0.002); methicillin resistant (n = 100, risk ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.14-2.51; P = 0.010)]. Among methicillin-susceptible SAB cases treated with β-lactam therapy, VT remained associated with clinical failure (risk ratio, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.19-2.61; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS:VT was associated with clinical failure in SAB, irrespective of methicillin susceptibility or definitive treatment. VT may decrease the effectiveness of cell-wall-active therapy or be a surrogate marker of some other pathogen-specific factor associated with poor outcomes. Future research should evaluate if bactericidal non-cell-wall-active agents improve outcomes in VTSAB.
Authors: Nimish Patel; Manjunath P Pai; Keith A Rodvold; Ben Lomaestro; George L Drusano; Thomas P Lodise Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: N E Holmes; J D Turnidge; W J Munckhof; J O Robinson; T M Korman; M V N O'Sullivan; T L Anderson; S A Roberts; S J C Warren; W Gao; P D R Johnson; B P Howden Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: George Sakoulas; Pamela A Moise-Broder; Jerome Schentag; Alan Forrest; Robert C Moellering; George M Eliopoulos Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Nicholas S Britt; Daniel S Hazlett; Rebecca T Horvat; Rachael M Liesman; Molly E Steed Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2020-01-11 Impact factor: 5.283