Sue Anne Bell1, Michelle L Munro-Kramer2, Marisa C Eisenberg3, Garfee Williams4, Patricia Amarah5, Jody R Lori6. 1. University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls, Rm 3340, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States. Electronic address: sabell@med.umich.edu. 2. University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls, Rm 3188, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States. Electronic address: mlmunro@umich.edu. 3. Epidemiology, M5166 SPH II, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-202, United States. Electronic address: marisae@umich.edu. 4. Africare, 1000 Monrovia 10, Liberia. Electronic address: gwilliams@africare.org. 5. Africare, 1000 Monrovia 10, Liberia. Electronic address: pamarah@africare.org. 6. University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls Rm 3320A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States. Electronic address: jrlori@umich.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: the purpose of this study was to explore healthcare providers' perceptions and reactions to the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) epidemic. DESIGN: a descriptive, qualitative study design was employed. Focus groups were conducted with Liberian healthcare providers who participated in care of patients with EVD. SETTING: the study was conducted in Bong County, Liberia (population: 333,000), which was severely affected, with over 650 reported cases and close to 200 deaths by the end of 2015. PARTICIPANTS: the total sample of 58 participants, included 11 nurses, ten traditional birth attendants (TBAs), four midwives, 28 general community health volunteers, three physician assistants, one community member and one pharmacy dispenser. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: five core themes related to changes in healthcare practices and interactions since the EVD outbreak were identified based on the results of the focus groups; fear, stigma, resource constraints, lack of knowledge and training, and shifting cultural practices. KEY CONCLUSIONS: this work represents a preliminary understanding of Liberian healthcare workers reactions to the EVD epidemic, and highlights the significant issues they faced as they attempted to care for patients and protect themselves. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: while the EVD epidemic has been declared over, preparedness activities for future disease outbreaks must continue. This study can inform future healthcare policy initiatives as well as preparedness activities targeted towards healthcare workers in low resource settings.
OBJECTIVE: the purpose of this study was to explore healthcare providers' perceptions and reactions to the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) epidemic. DESIGN: a descriptive, qualitative study design was employed. Focus groups were conducted with Liberian healthcare providers who participated in care of patients with EVD. SETTING: the study was conducted in Bong County, Liberia (population: 333,000), which was severely affected, with over 650 reported cases and close to 200 deaths by the end of 2015. PARTICIPANTS: the total sample of 58 participants, included 11 nurses, ten traditional birth attendants (TBAs), four midwives, 28 general community health volunteers, three physician assistants, one community member and one pharmacy dispenser. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: five core themes related to changes in healthcare practices and interactions since the EVD outbreak were identified based on the results of the focus groups; fear, stigma, resource constraints, lack of knowledge and training, and shifting cultural practices. KEY CONCLUSIONS: this work represents a preliminary understanding of Liberian healthcare workers reactions to the EVD epidemic, and highlights the significant issues they faced as they attempted to care for patients and protect themselves. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: while the EVD epidemic has been declared over, preparedness activities for future disease outbreaks must continue. This study can inform future healthcare policy initiatives as well as preparedness activities targeted towards healthcare workers in low resource settings.
Authors: Jody R Lori; Michelle L Munro; Sarah Rominski; Garfee Williams; Bernice T Dahn; Carol J Boyd; Jennifer E Moore; Walter Gwenegale Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Abhishek Pandey; Katherine E Atkins; Jan Medlock; Natasha Wenzel; Jeffrey P Townsend; James E Childs; Tolbert G Nyenswah; Martial L Ndeffo-Mbah; Alison P Galvani Journal: Science Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Robert A Fowler; Thomas Fletcher; William A Fischer; Francois Lamontagne; Shevin Jacob; David Brett-Major; James V Lawler; Frederique A Jacquerioz; Catherine Houlihan; Tim O'Dempsey; Mauricio Ferri; Takuya Adachi; Marie-Claire Lamah; Elhadj Ibrahima Bah; Thierry Mayet; John Schieffelin; Susan L McLellan; Mikiko Senga; Yasuyuki Kato; Christophe Clement; Simon Mardel; Rosa Constanza Vallenas Bejar De Villar; Nahoko Shindo; Daniel Bausch Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Sharon Alane Abramowitz; Kristen E McLean; Sarah Lindley McKune; Kevin Louis Bardosh; Mosoka Fallah; Josephine Monger; Kodjo Tehoungue; Patricia A Omidian Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2015-04-09
Authors: Almea Matanock; M Allison Arwady; Patrick Ayscue; Joseph D Forrester; Bethany Gaddis; Jennifer C Hunter; Benjamin Monroe; Satish K Pillai; Christie Reed; Ilana J Schafer; Moses Massaquoi; Bernice Dahn; Kevin M De Cock Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Umberto Pellecchia; Rosa Crestani; Tom Decroo; Rafael Van den Bergh; Yasmine Al-Kourdi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kamalini Lokuge; Grazia Caleo; Jane Greig; Jennifer Duncombe; Nicholas McWilliam; James Squire; Manjo Lamin; Emily Veltus; Anja Wolz; Gary Kobinger; Marc-Antoine de la Vega; Osman Gbabai; Sao Nabieu; Mohammed Lamin; Ronald Kremer; Kostas Danis; Emily Banks; Kathryn Glass Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2016-03-09
Authors: Udhayashankar Kanagasabai; Kayla Enriquez; Richard Gelting; Paul Malpiedi; Celina Zayzay; James Kendor; Shirley Fahnbulleh; Catherine Cooper; Williamatta Gibson; Rose Brown; Nadoris Nador; Desmond E Williams; David Chiriboga; Michelle Niescierenko Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 3.390