Literature DB >> 27998666

Feasibility of CBCT-based proton dose calculation using a histogram-matching algorithm in proton beam therapy.

Kazuhiro Arai1, Noriyuki Kadoya2, Takahiro Kato3, Hiromitsu Endo3, Shinya Komori3, Yoshitomo Abe1, Tatsuya Nakamura4, Hitoshi Wada4, Yasuhiro Kikuchi4, Yoshihiro Takai4, Keiichi Jingu5.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to confirm On-Board Imager cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using the histogram-matching algorithm as a useful method for proton dose calculation. We studied one head and neck phantom, one pelvic phantom, and ten patients with head and neck cancer treated using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy. We modified Hounsfield unit (HU) values of CBCT and generated two modified CBCTs (mCBCT-RR, mCBCT-DIR) using the histogram-matching algorithm: modified CBCT with rigid registration (mCBCT-RR) and that with deformable image registration (mCBCT-DIR). Rigid and deformable image registration were applied to match the CBCT to planning CT. To evaluate the accuracy of the proton dose calculation, we compared dose differences in the dosimetric parameters (D2% and D98%) for clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV). We also evaluated the accuracy of the dosimetric parameters (Dmean and D2%) for some organs at risk, and compared the proton ranges (PR) between planning CT (reference) and CBCT or mCBCTs, and the gamma passing rates of CBCT and mCBCTs. For patients, the average dose and PR differences of mCBCTs were smaller than those of CBCT. Additionally, the average gamma passing rates of mCBCTs were larger than those of CBCT (e.g., 94.1±3.5% in mCBCT-DIR vs. 87.8±7.4% in CBCT). We evaluated the accuracy of the proton dose calculation in CBCT and mCBCTs for two phantoms and ten patients. Our results showed that HU modification using the histogram-matching algorithm could improve the accuracy of the proton dose calculation.
Copyright © 2016 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive radiotherapy; CBCT; Deformable image registration; Head and neck cancer; Proton therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27998666     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  7 in total

Review 1.  Online daily adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Francesca Albertini; Michael Matter; Lena Nenoff; Ye Zhang; Antony Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Fast shading correction for cone-beam CT via partitioned tissue classification.

Authors:  Linxi Shi; Adam Wang; Jikun Wei; Lei Zhu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Generating synthetic CT from low-dose cone-beam CT by using generative adversarial networks for adaptive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Liugang Gao; Kai Xie; Xiaojin Wu; Zhengda Lu; Chunying Li; Jiawei Sun; Tao Lin; Jianfeng Sui; Xinye Ni
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Evaluating Proton Dose and Associated Range Uncertainty Using Daily Cone-Beam CT.

Authors:  Heng Li; William T Hrinivich; Hao Chen; Khadija Sheikh; Meng Wei Ho; Rachel Ger; Dezhi Liu; Russell Kenneth Hales; Khinh Ranh Voong; Aditya Halthore; Curtiland Deville
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Advances in Image-Guided Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Oral Cavity Cancer.

Authors:  Hsin-Hua Nien; Li-Ying Wang; Li-Jen Liao; Ping-Yi Lin; Chia-Yun Wu; Pei-Wei Shueng; Chen-Shuan Chung; Wu-Chia Lo; Shih-Chiang Lin; Chen-Hsi Hsieh
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  A clinical 3D/4D CBCT-based treatment dose monitoring system.

Authors:  An Qin; David Gersten; Jian Liang; Qiang Liu; Inga Grill; Thomas Guerrero; Craig Stevens; Di Yan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.