Literature DB >> 27997470

Oncological Outcomes After Robotic Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: Analysis of a Prospective Database.

Tarik Sammour1, Songphol Malakorn1, Brian K Bednarski1,2, Harmeet Kaur3, Ui Sup Shin1, Craig Messick1, Yi-Qian Nancy You1, George J Chang1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological outcomes of robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) at an NCI designated cancer center. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The effectiveness of laparoscopic TME could not be established, but the robotic-assisted approach may hold some promise, with improved visualization and ergonomics for pelvic dissection. Oncological outcome data is presently lacking.
METHODS: Patients who underwent total mesorectal excision or tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer between April 2009 and April 2016 via a robotic approach were identified from a prospective single-institution database. The circumferential resection margin (CRM), distal resection margin, and TME completeness rates were determined. Kaplan-Meier analysis of disease-free survival and overall survival was performed for all patients treated with curative intent.
RESULTS: A total of 276 patients underwent robotic proctectomy during the study period. Robotic surgery was performed initially by 1 surgeon with 3 additional surgeons progressively transitioning from open to robotic during the study period with annual increase in the total number of cases performed robotically. Seven patients had involved circumferential resection margins (2.5%), and there were no positive distal or proximal resection margins. One hundred eighty-six patients had TME quality assessed, and only 1 patient (0.5%) had an incomplete TME. Eighty-three patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 years, with a local recurrence rate of 2.4%, and a distant recurrence rate of 16.9%. Five-year disease-free survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis was 82%, and 5-year overall survival was 87%.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic proctectomy for rectal cancer can be performed with good short and medium term oncological outcomes in selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 27997470      PMCID: PMC5498254          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  27 in total

Review 1.  Total mesorectal excision: open, laparoscopic or robotic.

Authors:  Monica Young; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2014

Review 2.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; ZhengQiang Wei; MengJun Bie; XuDong Peng; Cheng Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Rectal cancer resection: Laparoscopic or open--which way forward?.

Authors:  James W Fleshman; Judy C Boughey; Y Nancy You
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-01

4.  Oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinicopathologic results after robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Nam Kyu Kim; Dae Ro Lim; Hyuk Hur; Byung So Min; Kang Young Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  T4 colorectal cancer: is laparoscopic resection contraindicated?

Authors:  F Bretagnol; A Dedieu; M Zappa; N Guedj; M Ferron; Y Panis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Reverse-hybrid robotic mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  In Ja Park; Y Nancy You; Erika Schlette; Sa Nguyen; John M Skibber; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; George J Chang
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  S H Baik; Y T Ko; C M Kang; W J Lee; N K Kim; S K Sohn; H S Chi; C H Cho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Zhifei Sun; Jina Kim; Mohamed A Adam; Daniel P Nussbaum; Paul J Speicher; Christopher R Mantyh; John Migaly
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Robotic-Assisted Surgery Improves the Quality of Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer Compared to Laparoscopy: Results of a Case-Controlled Analysis.

Authors:  Pierre Allemann; Céline Duvoisin; Luca Di Mare; Martin Hübner; Nicolas Demartines; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  14 in total

1.  Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: results of a single high-volume center in Japan.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Akio Shiomi; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa; Akinobu Furuatni; Shoichi Manabe; Yusuke Yamaoka; Hitoshi Hino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Hype or Hope? (Indian Experience).

Authors:  S P Somashekhar; K R Ashwin; C Rohit Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-08

3.  Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.

Authors:  M Benjamin Hopkins; Timothy M Geiger; Alva J Bethurum; Molly M Ford; Roberta L Muldoon; David E Beck; Thomas G Stewart; Alexander T Hawkins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Current Status of the Management of Stage I Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Craig Howard Olson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Toshinori Sueda; Mitsuyoshi Tei; Kentaro Nishida; Yukihiro Yoshikawa; Tae Matsumura; Chikato Koga; Masaki Wakasugi; Hiromichi Miyagaki; Ryohei Kawabata; Masanori Tsujie; Junichi Hasegawa
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-04-22

6.  Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Claudio Fiorillo; Giuseppe Quero; Roberta Menghi; Caterina Cina; Vito Laterza; Davide De Sio; Fabio Longo; Sergio Alfieri
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-11-10

7.  Watch and Wait Approach After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: Initial Experience in the Indian subcontinent.

Authors:  Reena Engineer; Avanish Saklani; Ashwin D'souza; Supreeta Arya; Suman Kumar; Vikas Ostwal; Anant Ramaswamy; Supriya Chopra; Prachi Patil
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-09

8.  Short-term and long-term outcomes of robotic rectal surgery-from the real word data of 1145 consecutive cases in China.

Authors:  Wenju Chang; Ye Wei; Li Ren; Mi Jian; Yijiao Chen; Jingwen Chen; Tianyu Liu; Wenbai Huang; Shangjin Peng; Jianmin Xu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Short- and long-term outcomes for transvaginal specimen extraction versus minilaparotomy after robotic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a mono-institution retrospective study.

Authors:  Gengmei Gao; Lan Chen; Rui Luo; Bo Tang; Taiyuan Li
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Single-docking robotic assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer below peritoneal reflection: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Zijia Song; Yaqi Zhang; Feng Ye; Xi Cheng; Shaodong Wang; Xiaoqian Jing; Xiaopin Ji; Ren Zhao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.