Literature DB >> 27997376

Voxel-based dose prediction with multi-patient atlas selection for automated radiotherapy treatment planning.

Chris McIntosh1, Thomas G Purdie.   

Abstract

Automating the radiotherapy treatment planning process is a technically challenging problem. The majority of automated approaches have focused on customizing and inferring dose volume objectives to be used in plan optimization. In this work we outline a multi-patient atlas-based dose prediction approach that learns to predict the dose-per-voxel for a novel patient directly from the computed tomography planning scan without the requirement of specifying any objectives. Our method learns to automatically select the most effective atlases for a novel patient, and then map the dose from those atlases onto the novel patient. We extend our previous work to include a conditional random field for the optimization of a joint distribution prior that matches the complementary goals of an accurately spatially distributed dose distribution while still adhering to the desired dose volume histograms. The resulting distribution can then be used for inverse-planning with a new spatial dose objective, or to create typical dose volume objectives for the canonical optimization pipeline. We investigated six treatment sites (633 patients for training and 113 patients for testing) and evaluated the mean absolute difference in all DVHs for the clinical and predicted dose distribution. The results on average are favorable in comparison to our previous approach (1.91 versus 2.57). Comparing our method with and without atlas-selection further validates that atlas-selection improved dose prediction on average in whole breast (0.64 versus 1.59), prostate (2.13 versus 4.07), and rectum (1.46 versus 3.29) while it is less important in breast cavity (0.79 versus 0.92) and lung (1.33 versus 1.27) for which there is high conformity and minimal dose shaping. In CNS brain, atlas-selection has the potential to be impactful (3.65 versus 5.09), but selecting the ideal atlas is the most challenging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27997376     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/62/2/415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  13 in total

Review 1.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Ben J M Heijmen; Dirk Verellen; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Automatic replanning of VMAT plans for different treatment machines: A template-based approach using constrained optimization.

Authors:  Luise A Künzel; Oliver S Dohm; Markus Alber; Daniel Zips; Daniela Thorwarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  An atlas-based method to predict three-dimensional dose distributions for cancer patients who receive radiotherapy.

Authors:  S A Yoganathan; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Improving Proton Dose Calculation Accuracy by Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Chao Wu; Dan Nguyen; Yixun Xing; Ana Barragan Montero; Jan Schuemann; Haijiao Shang; Yuehu Pu; Steve Jiang
Journal:  Mach Learn Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-06

5.  [Prediction of three-dimensional dose distribution in intensity-modulated radiation therapy based on neural network learning].

Authors:  Fan-Tu Kong; Yan-Hua Mai; Meng-Ke Qi; Ai-Qian Wu; Fu-Tong Guo; Qi-Yuan Jia; Yong-Bao Li; Ting Song; Ling-Hong Zhou
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-06-20

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: A technology review.

Authors:  Ana Barragán-Montero; Umair Javaid; Gilmer Valdés; Dan Nguyen; Paul Desbordes; Benoit Macq; Siri Willems; Liesbeth Vandewinckele; Mats Holmström; Fredrik Löfman; Steven Michiels; Kevin Souris; Edmond Sterpin; John A Lee
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Performance Comparison of Knowledge-Based Dose Prediction Techniques Based on Limited Patient Data.

Authors:  Angelia Landers; Ryan Neph; Fabien Scalzo; Dan Ruan; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01

8.  Utilisation of Pareto navigation techniques to calibrate a fully automated radiotherapy treatment planning solution.

Authors:  Philip A Wheeler; Michael Chu; Rosemary Holmes; Maeve Smyth; Rhydian Maggs; Emiliano Spezi; John Staffurth; David G Lewis; Anthony E Millin
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-05-16

9.  A knowledge-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning technique for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy.

Authors:  Penggang Bai; Xing Weng; Kerun Quan; Jihong Chen; Yitao Dai; Yuanji Xu; Fasheng Lin; Jing Zhong; Tianming Wu; Chuanben Chen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Multiobjective, Multidelivery Optimization for Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning.

Authors:  William Tyler Watkins; Hamidreza Nourzadeh; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.