PURPOSE: To quantify the burden and complexity associated with treatment of Medicare beneficiaries with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Using the SEER-Medicare database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries who were diagnosed with stage I NSCLC from 2007 to 2011 and who were treated with surgery, stereotactic body radiation therapy, or external beam radiation therapy. Main outcome measures were the number of days a patient was in contact with the health care system (encounter days), the number of physicians involved in a patient's care, and the number of medications prescribed. Logistic regression modeled the association between patient characteristics, treatment type, and high treatment burden (defined as ≥ 66 encounter days). RESULTS: On average, 7,955 patients spent 1 in 3 days interacting with the health care system during the initial 60 days of treatment. Patients experienced a median of 44 encounter days with high variability (interquartile range [IQR], 29 to 66) in the 12 months after treatment initiation. The median number of physicians involved was 20 (IQR, 14 to 28), and the median number of medications prescribed was 12 (IQR, 8 to 17). Patients who were treated with surgery had high treatment burden (predicted probability, 21.6%; 95% CI, 20.2 to 23.1) compared with patients who were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (predicted probability, 16.1%; 95% CI, 12.9 to 19.3), whereas patients who were treated with external beam radiation therapy had the highest burden (predicted probability, 46.8%; 95% CI, 43.3 to 50.2). CONCLUSION: The treatment burden imposed on patients with early-stage NSCLC was substantial in terms of the number of encounters, physicians involved, and medications prescribed. Because treatment burden varied markedly across patients and treatment types, future work should identify opportunities to understand and ameliorate this burden.
PURPOSE: To quantify the burden and complexity associated with treatment of Medicare beneficiaries with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Using the SEER-Medicare database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries who were diagnosed with stage I NSCLC from 2007 to 2011 and who were treated with surgery, stereotactic body radiation therapy, or external beam radiation therapy. Main outcome measures were the number of days a patient was in contact with the health care system (encounter days), the number of physicians involved in a patient's care, and the number of medications prescribed. Logistic regression modeled the association between patient characteristics, treatment type, and high treatment burden (defined as ≥ 66 encounter days). RESULTS: On average, 7,955 patients spent 1 in 3 days interacting with the health care system during the initial 60 days of treatment. Patients experienced a median of 44 encounter days with high variability (interquartile range [IQR], 29 to 66) in the 12 months after treatment initiation. The median number of physicians involved was 20 (IQR, 14 to 28), and the median number of medications prescribed was 12 (IQR, 8 to 17). Patients who were treated with surgery had high treatment burden (predicted probability, 21.6%; 95% CI, 20.2 to 23.1) compared with patients who were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (predicted probability, 16.1%; 95% CI, 12.9 to 19.3), whereas patients who were treated with external beam radiation therapy had the highest burden (predicted probability, 46.8%; 95% CI, 43.3 to 50.2). CONCLUSION: The treatment burden imposed on patients with early-stage NSCLC was substantial in terms of the number of encounters, physicians involved, and medications prescribed. Because treatment burden varied markedly across patients and treatment types, future work should identify opportunities to understand and ameliorate this burden.
Authors: Robert Timmerman; Rebecca Paulus; James Galvin; Jeffrey Michalski; William Straube; Jeffrey Bradley; Achilles Fakiris; Andrea Bezjak; Gregory Videtic; David Johnstone; Jack Fowler; Elizabeth Gore; Hak Choy Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Shervin M Shirvani; Jing Jiang; Joe Y Chang; James W Welsh; Daniel R Gomez; Stephen Swisher; Thomas A Buchholz; Benjamin D Smith Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Joe Y Chang; Suresh Senan; Marinus A Paul; Reza J Mehran; Alexander V Louie; Peter Balter; Harry J M Groen; Stephen E McRae; Joachim Widder; Lei Feng; Ben E E M van den Borne; Mark F Munsell; Coen Hurkmans; Donald A Berry; Erik van Werkhoven; John J Kresl; Anne-Marie Dingemans; Omar Dawood; Cornelis J A Haasbeek; Larry S Carpenter; Katrien De Jaeger; Ritsuko Komaki; Ben J Slotman; Egbert F Smit; Jack A Roth Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: David Palma; Otto Visser; Frank J Lagerwaard; Jose Belderbos; Ben Slotman; Suresh Senan Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: David T Eton; Djenane Ramalho de Oliveira; Jason S Egginton; Jennifer L Ridgeway; Laura Odell; Carl R May; Victor M Montori Journal: Patient Relat Outcome Meas Date: 2012-08-24
Authors: Erin M Bange; Abigail Doucette; Peter E Gabriel; Florence Porterfield; James J Harrigan; Robin Wang; Andrzej P Wojcieszynski; Ben Boursi; Bethany I Mooney; Kim A Reiss; Ronac Mamtani Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2020-03-04
Authors: Orla C Sheehan; Bruce Leff; Christine S Ritchie; Sarah K Garrigues; Lingsheng Li; Debra Saliba; Roya Fathi; Cynthia M Boyd Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Nicole El-Turk; Michael S H Chou; Natasha C H Ting; Afaf Girgis; Shalini K Vinod; Victoria Bray; Claudia C Dobler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 3.240