Literature DB >> 27995069

Longitudinal imaging in C9orf72 mutation carriers: Relationship to phenotype.

Mary Kay Floeter1, Devin Bageac1, Laura E Danielian1, Laura E Braun1, Bryan J Traynor2, Justin Y Kwan3.   

Abstract

Expansion mutations in the C9orf72 gene may cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), or mixtures of the two clinical phenotypes. Different imaging findings have been described for C9orf72-associated diseases in comparison with sporadic patients with the same phenotypes, but it is uncertain whether different phenotypes have a common genotype-associated imaging signature. To address this question, 27 unrelated C9orf72 expansion mutation carriers (C9 +) with varied phenotypes, 28 age-matched healthy controls and 22 patients with sporadic ALS (sALS) underwent 3T MRI scanning and clinical phenotyping. Measures of brain volumes and cortical thickness were extracted from T1 images. Compared to healthy controls and sALS patients, symptomatic C9 + subjects had greater ventricular volume loss and thalamic atrophy for age, with diffuse, patchy cortical thinning. Asymptomatic carriers did not differ from controls. C9 + ALS and ALS-FTD patients had less thinning of the motor cortex than sALS patients, but more thinning in extramotor regions, particularly in frontal and temporal lobes. C9 + ALS patients differed from sporadic ALS patients in the thickness of the superior frontal gyrus and lateral orbitofrontal cortex. Thickness of the precentral gyrus was weakly correlated with the revised ALS functional rating scale. Thickness of many cortical regions, including several frontal and temporal regions, was moderately correlated with letter fluency scores. Letter fluency scores were weakly correlated with ventricular and thalamic volume. To better understand how imaging findings are related to disease progression, nineteen C9 + subjects and 23 healthy controls were scanned approximately 6 months later. Ventricular volume increased in C9 + patients with FTD and ALS-FTD phenotypes and remained stable in asymptomatic C9 + subjects. We conclude that diffuse atrophy is a common underlying feature of disease associated with C9orf72 mutations across its clinical phenotypes. Ventricular enlargement can be measured over a 6-month time frame, and appears to be faster in patients with cognitive impairment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALSFRS-R, ALS functional rating scale — revised; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; ANOVA, analysis of variance; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; C9orf72; C9 +,  subjects with C9orf72 expansion mutations; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; Cortical thickness; DRS-2, Mattis dementia rating scale; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; Diffusion tensor imaging; FBI, frontobehavioral inventory; FDR, false discovery rate correction; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; Frontotemporal dementia; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SD, standard deviation; TIV, total intracranial volume; Ventricular volume; bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; sALS, sporadic ALS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27995069      PMCID: PMC5153604          DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage Clin        ISSN: 2213-1582            Impact factor:   4.881


Introduction

Expansion mutations in the C9orf72 gene are one of the most common causes of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in US and European populations (Renton et al., 2011, DeJesus-Hernandez et al., 2011, Majounie et al., 2012). Patients with the C9orf72 mutation can present with a clinical phenotype of FTD, ALS, or a combination of ALS and FTD symptoms, even within the same family (Kaivorinne et al., 2013, Hsiung et al., 2012, Rohrer et al., 2015a). Cross-sectional studies from ALS specialty clinics found it accounted for 6–8% of non-familial ALS cases, possibly because the gene is not fully penetrant before the ninth decade (Majounie et al., 2012), or because a family history of dementia was not appreciated. Because ALS and FTD patients are typically seen in different specialty clinics, studies of brain imaging have compared C9orf72 ALS and FTD patients to sporadic patients with the same phenotypes. C9orf72-specific imaging features of patients with ALS and FTD have been described in comparison to sporadic patients with the same clinical phenotype (Bede et al., 2013a, Byrne et al., 2012, Rohrer et al., 2015b, Whitwell et al., 2015, Bocchetta et al., 2016). Among behavioral variant FTD patients (bvFTD), patients with C9orf72 mutations had a more diffuse pattern of atrophy than patients with progranulin or MAPT mutations (Whitwell et al., 2015, Rohrer and Warren, 2011). Within ALS cohorts, C9orf72 ALS patients had greater subcortical atrophy compared to sporadic ALS patients (Bede et al., 2013a, Byrne et al., 2012). It is not clear whether a common imaging signature exists across all C9orf72 gene carriers. Understanding how the imaging findings differ between clinical phenotypes, and the relationship between disease progression and imaging findings requires a comparison between C9orf72 gene carriers with different phenotypes. Moreover, reports of imaging differences between asymptomatic C9orf72 gene carriers and non-carriers (Rohrer et al., 2015b, Walhout et al., 2015) raise the question whether symptoms are preceded by subclinical degeneration or whether differences reflect a developmental feature. If imaging changes in asymptomatic carriers result from ongoing subclinical degeneration, the changes would be expected to progress over time. In symptomatic carriers, the relationship between imaging findings and disease progression is relevant to the question of whether imaging changes can be used as a biomarker to follow disease progression in clinical trials (Cardenas-Blanco et al., 2016, Filippi et al., 2015). The time frame of clinical trials in ALS tends to be short, typically 6 months to one year, because of the short survival after a diagnosis of ALS is made (Miller et al., 1999). For an imaging measure to be useful as a biomarker, it should have measurable changes over 6 months, have good reliability and effect size, and be correlated to a clinical measure of disease activity. To better understand the relationship between the C9orf72 genotype and phenotypes, symptomatic and asymptomatic C9orf72 gene carriers were recruited for a prospective longitudinal imaging study with clinical evaluations. These participants were not selected for particular clinical presentations in order to permit the spectrum of C9orf72 phenotypes to be explored. Imaging of C9orf72 gene carriers was compared to sporadic ALS patients and healthy controls. The relationship between imaging changes and disease activity was evaluated longitudinally, as well as in cross-sectional comparisons to sporadic ALS patients and healthy controls.

Methods

Subjects

C9orf72 participants and controls

Twenty-seven unrelated participants with expansion mutations in the C9orf72 gene (15 males, 12 females; hereafter referred to as C9 + subjects) and 28 healthy controls (18 males, 10 females) gave written, informed consent for participation in protocols that were approved by the NIH Combined Neuroscience Institutional Review Board (NCT01925196; NCT01517087).

Sporadic ALS cohort

Twenty-two patients with no family history of ALS or FTD (11 males, 11 females; hereafter referred to sALS) gave written, informed consent for an imaging and cognitive study approved by the NINDS Institutional Review Board (NCT00334516). This cohort was studied prospectively between 2006 and 2010, prior to the discovery of C9orf72, and the approved protocol did not include stored DNA. Clinical characteristics and selected imaging findings from this cohort have been previously described (Kwan et al., 2012).

Diagnostic testing

C9 + subjects

A hexanucleotide repeat expansion of C9orf72 was confirmed in all C9 + subjects by CLIA-certified clinical testing laboratories. All C9 + subjects were examined by an experienced neurologist (MKF or BT), and underwent electromyography and cognitive testing to determine a clinical diagnosis. C9 + subjects meeting the El Escorial criteria-revised for possible, probable, or definite ALS (Brooks et al., 2000) were classified as having a clinical diagnosis of ALS. Cognitive testing for determining the clinical diagnosis included the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS-2) (Jurica et al., 2001), which tests attention, initiation-perseveration, conceptualization, construction and memory, and provides age- and education- scaled scores, and the Frontobehavioral Inventory, an examiner-delivered 36-item caregiver questionnaire. (Milan et al., 2008) C9 + subjects meeting the Rascovsky criteria (Rascovsky et al., 2008) for possible, probable or definite bvFTD were classified as having a clinical diagnosis of bvFTD. Some C9 + subjects met criteria for both ALS and bvFTD. As a result, C9 + subjects were classified into four phenotype groups: 1) C9 + asymptomatic, 2) C9 + ALS, 3) C9 + bvFTD and 4) C9 + ALS-FTD.

Healthy controls

All healthy control subjects had a normal neurological examination and normal scores on the Mini-mental state exam. (Folstein et al., 1975) None had a family history of ALS or FTD.

Sporadic ALS

A history and neurological exam was carried out by an experienced neurologist (MKF or JK). All ALS patients underwent diagnostic testing to confirm that they fulfilled the El Escorial criteria for possible, probable, or definite ALS (Brooks et al., 2000). Cognitive testing for determining the clinical diagnosis included the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (Jurica et al., 2001) and the Frontal Systems Behavioral scale Frontal Systems Behavioral Scale (Stout et al., 2003), which consists of patient and caregiver interview on current and premorbid symptoms of apathy, disinhibition, and executive dysfunction. None of the sALS patients had dementia.

Clinical measures

The severity of motor and executive dysfunction of C9 + subjects and sALS patients was measured at the baseline visit, and at follow-up visits of the C9 + subjects, for comparison with imaging findings. Motor function was measured using the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), a 48-point scale assessing bulbar, fine motor, gross motor, and respiratory function (Cedarbaum et al., 1999). Letter fluency, a measure of executive function, was measured using the fluency subtests of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (Delis et al., 2004). Letter fluency results are reported here as the total correct number of words generated in 1 min for 3 letters, either written or orally. The alternate version of the D-KEFS fluency subtest was used at the 6-month follow-up of C9 + subjects.

Imaging methods

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition

C9 + subjects and healthy controls

A 3T MRI scanner with a receive-only, eight-channel head coil (GE HDX, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) was used for imaging the C9 + subjects and healthy controls. Two high-resolution T1-weighted sequences (3D fast spoiled gradient echo sequence, TR + TE vary, TI = 450 ms, FOV 240 × 240, Resolution 256 × 256, 140 slices, 1 mm thickness, voxel = 0.9375 mm × 0.9375 mm × 1 mm) were acquired and averaged at each time point for FreeSurfer evaluation of volumes and cortical thickness. All patients undergoing scanning had a vital capacity of at least 60% predicted volume; a pulse oximeter was used to monitor patients with vital capacity below 70%, and all had > 90% oxygen saturation throughout the scanning session.

Sporadic ALS cohort

MRI studies of the sALS patients were performed on a 3T scanner (Philips Achieva, Best, the Netherlands) using a receive-only, eight-channel head coil. For volumetric and thickness measurements, a high resolution T1 weighted image (3D turbo field echo sequence, TR = 8.6 ms, TE = 3.9 ms, TI = 700 ms, FOV 240 × 240, Resolution 256 × 256, 140 slices, 1 mm thickness, voxel = 0.9375 mm × 0.9375 mm × 1 mm) was obtained. All patients had vital capacity of 70% or greater.

Image processing: Volumetric and cortical thickness measures

Cortical reconstruction and volumetric segmentation was performed with the FreeSurfer image analysis suite (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). The technical details of these procedures have been described and validated in prior publications (Fischl et al., 1999, Fischl et al., 2002, Fischl et al., 2004). Briefly, the processing included skull stripping, Talairach transformation, optimization of the grey matter-white matter and grey matter-CSF boundaries, segmentation, and tessellation (Dale et al., 1999). Images were visually inspected and scans with errors in segmentation of cortical or CSF surfaces and grey-white junctions were manually corrected. Atrophied brains were carefully inspected for errors. The tessellated surfaces were then inflated and registered to the Desikan-Killiany atlas which parcellates the cerebral cortex into 34 regions in each hemisphere based on gyral and sulcal structures (Desikan et al., 2006). The FreeSurfer longitudinal stream, which creates an unbiased within-subject template for measuring changes in cortical thickness over time (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LongitudinalProcessing) (Reuter et al., 2012) was used. Measures of regional cortical thickness were compared between subgroups and longitudinally. The FreeSurfer QDEC tool was used to carry out whole-brain vertex-wise comparisons between the baseline scans of symptomatic C9 + subjects and healthy controls, and between the C9 + ALS/ALS-FTD patients and sALS patients, including gender as a covariate. Data were smoothed at 10 mm, and p < 0.05 with FDR correction was used as criteria for significance. The volume of ventricles and subcortical structures were also obtained from FreeSurfer. The ventricular volume was obtained by summing the number of voxels within all ventricles. Volumes were expressed as a percentage of total intracranial volume (%TIV) to account for differences in head size for group comparisons. Because FreeSurfer is not optimized to produce an accurate measure of TIV, this value was calculated in Statistical Parametric Mapping 12 (SPM12, method of Malone and colleagues (Malone et al., 2015).

Statistics

Demographic and clinical results are reported as means ± standard deviations (SD) in tables and text. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test normality of clinical variables. Age, disease duration, and letter fluency scores were normally distributed, and comparisons between groups were carried out by ANOVA or t-tests. The ALSFRS-R was not normally distributed. Mann-Whitney or Kruskal Wallis tests were used for variables that were not normally distributed. ANCOVA was used to compare volumetric and regional thickness measures, with age and gender as covariates. Post-hoc testing between C9 + subgroups and controls was carried out using Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons or Dunn's correction for nonparametric testing. Pearson's r was used to assess correlations. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess longitudinal changes, adjusting for age and gender as covariates. Statistics were calculated with SPSS v.23 (IBM SPSS Statistics). Significance was defined as p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons. G*Power v 3.1 (http://www.gpower.hhu.de/en.html, accessed 8/25/2016) was used for power and sample size calculations.

Results

Clinical demographics

Demographics of groups

There was no difference in age between the C9 +, sALS, and healthy control groups. The ratio of men to women was similar in the groups, with slightly more men than women in the C9 + and control groups (Table 1). Symptom duration and ALSFRS-R did not differ between sALS and symptomatic C9 + patients.
Table 1

Demographics of subject groups, baseline evaluation.

ControlssALS patientsC9orf72 subjects (all)C9 + diagnosis subgroups
AsymptomaticALSALS-FTDbvFTD
Number28222771163
Age (years)52.8 ± 9.155.9 ± 11.152.2 ± 11.741.2 ± 11a52.3 ± 8.860.8 ± 10.260.6 ± 5.1
Male:Female18:1011:1115:121:65:66:03:0
SymptomDuration* (months)27.1 ± 17.433.7 ± 24.030.7 ± 23.933.7 ± 29.329.4 ± 26.5
ALSFRS-R4840.0 ± 6.941.6 ± 7.64836.2 ± 8.4b41.8 ± 5.26b46.3 ± 2.9
MMSE29.0 ± 1.2
DRS-2 age/educScaled score8.3 ± 5.17.6 ± 4.310.7 ± 2.9a8.6 ± 3.63.8 ± 3.82.3 ± 2.3
Letter fluency (total for 3 letters)35.4 ± 11.828.6 ± 14.442.3 ± 12.4a30.0 ± 11.213.8 ± 3.016.0 ± 4.4

*Excluding asymptomatic carriers; MMSE mini-mental state exam; DRS-2 — Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, scaled for age and education, normal mean = 10; within C9 + subgroups.

Significantly different from C9 + ALS-FTD and bvFTD subgroups.

Significantly different from C9 + asymptomatic subjects.

C9 + subgroup demographics

At the baseline visit, seven C9 + subjects were asymptomatic, eleven had C9 + ALS, three had C9 + bvFTD, and six had C9 + ALS-FTD (Table 1). In the C9 + subgroups, asymptomatic subjects were younger than C9 + subjects with ALS-FTD (p = 0.013). In symptomatic C9 + subjects, cognitive-behavioral changes were the first symptom in six patients and a motor deficit was the first symptom in the other 14, including five patients with bulbar-onset ALS. Age of symptom onset and disease duration did not differ among subgroups of symptomatic C9 + patients. Cognitive testing showed that letter fluency and the DRS-2 age- and education-scaled score were not significantly different between the sALS and the C9 + groups as a whole (t-test, p = 0.1273, p = 0.6380). Asymptomatic C9 + subjects had significantly better scores than C9 + ALS-FTD and bvFTD patients, but were not different from C9 + ALS subjects. Nineteen C9 + subjects returned for a 6-month follow-up (mean = 5.7 ± 0.7 months), and seven returned for an 18-month follow-up. The 6-month follow-up cohort consisted of five C9 + asymptomatic, six C9 + ALS, five C9 + ALS-FTD, and three C9 + bvFTD subjects. Twenty-three of the 28 healthy controls had two imaging sessions and seventeen had three imaging sessions at various intervals. Control scans were selected with a mean interval of 5.6 ± 4.3 months to compare with the 6-month follow-up scans of C9 + subjects.

Volumetric measures

Baseline differences in ventricular volume

At the baseline visit, the C9 + subject group as a whole had evidence of brain atrophy, with increased ventricular volume compared to controls (Fig. 1A). The ventricular volume of the sALS group did not differ from controls. Among the C9 + subjects, the C9 + subgroup with ALS-FTD had larger ventricles than C9 + asymptomatic subjects and healthy controls (Fig. 1B). In all groups, age was correlated with ventricular volume, with no difference in slope between groups, although C9 + subjects had a significant intercept shift relative to controls and sALS, indicating greater atrophy for age. Ventricular volume was also correlated with symptom duration, with a significant shift in the intercept in the C9 + group (Fig. 1C). There was no significant effect of gender on ventricular volume, which was expressed as percentage of total intracranial volume.
Fig. 1

Ventricular volumes expressed as the percent of Total Intracranial Volume (TIV) at baseline (A–C) and longitudinally (D–F). A) At baseline, C9 + subject group had larger ventricles than healthy controls (HC; *p < 0.05). Sporadic ALS (sALS) did not differ from controls. B) Within the C9 + subgroups, C9 + ALS-FTD patients had larger ventricles than asymptomatic C9 + carriers (Asymp) and HC (*p < 0.05). C) Ventricular volume increased with disease duration in C9 + subjects (filled circles, solid lines) and sALS (open squares, dashed line) with a similar slope, but C9 + had larger ventricles, adjusted for age, compared to sALS and HC. D) Change in ventricular volume over 6 months in C9 + subjects. E) Rate of ventricular enlargement per month, calculated from baseline to 6 month-follow-up of 19 C9 + subjects and 23 HC (individual values, line indicates group mean). F) Ventricular volumes all scans C9 + subjects, including longitudinal scans for asymptomatic C9 + (filled circles), C9 + ALS (open circles), C9 + bvFTD (open triangles) and C9 + ALS-FTD (filled squares) plotted by symptom duration.

Longitudinal changes in ventricular volume

The ventricular volume increased on average by 3.5 ml in the symptomatic C9 + subjects in the 6-month interval between scans (Fig. 1D). The age-adjusted rate of ventricular enlargement was greater in C9 + subjects as a whole than controls, with a relatively broad range (Fig. 1E). Post-hoc statistics identified only the C9 + bvFTD and C9 + ALS-FTD subgroups as having greater ventricular enlargement than healthy controls over 6 months. In asymptomatic C9 + subjects, ventricular volume was relatively stable, including over longer longitudinal intervals, whereas symptomatic C9 + patients had increasing ventricular volumes, even among the symptomatic patients with long symptom duration (Fig. 1F).

Volumes of subcortical structures

In scans obtained at the baseline visit, the volume of the thalamus was smaller in C9 + subjects compared to controls and sALS patients. Both right and left sides of the thalamus had smaller volumes. Post-hoc testing showed that the thalamic volumes of C9 + bvFTD and C9 + ALS-FTD subgroups were less than controls (Table 2). There was no significant difference in the volume of the cerebellum, caudate, putamen, or pallidum among the C9 +, sALS, and control groups at baseline. Over the 6-month follow-up interval, C9 + subjects had significant volume loss in the thalamus but not in the other subcortical regions compared to controls.
Table 2

Volume of subcortical structures.

Healthy controlssALSC9 + (all)C9 + subtypes
Asymp.ALSbvFTDALS-FTD
Cerebellum8.65 ± 0.778.28 ± 0.918.46 ± 0.919.22 ± 0.748.64 ± 0.727.94 ± 0.367.53 ± 0.65
Thalamus0.98 ± 0.110.91 ± 0.100.88 ± 0.12a1.01 ± 0.080.90 ± 0.070.76 ± 0.09a0.77 ± 0.09a
Caudate0.50 ± 0.060.51 ± 0.060.47 ± 0.080.49 ± 0.070.52 ± 0.070.38 ± 0.070.41 ± 0.05
Putamen0.72 ± 0.100.70 ± 0.110.67 ± 0.150.78 ± 0.090.72 ± 0.110.51 ± 0.120.53 ± 0.10
Pallidum0.20 ± 0.030.21 ± 0.030.19 ± 0.040.21 ± 0.030.21 ± 0.030.14 ± 0.020.15 ± 0.03

Volumes are expressed as % of total intracranial volumes. sALS = sporadic ALS, Asymp = C9 + asymptomatic carriers.

Less than controls, p < 0.05, Dunnett's test, corrected for multiple comparisons.

Volume of cortical white matter

The volume of cortical white matter of the right and left hemispheres was less for C9 + subjects than sALS patients and controls (left cortex p = 0.014; right cortex p = 0.020), with age included as a covariate. Gender and disease duration were not significant covariates. Dunnett's test showed that among the C9 + subgroups, the C9 + ALS-FTD and FTD white matter volumes differed from that of sALS patients (p < 0.05). The white matter volume of sALS patients did not differ from controls (left, p = 0.843; right, p = 0.891).

Cortical thickness

Vertex-wise comparison between groups

A whole-brain comparison of cortical thickness between the 20 symptomatic C9 + subjects versus the 28 healthy controls showed a widespread, patchy distribution of cortical thinning (Fig. 2 A). Clusters of thinning were particularly prominent in the superior and medial frontal cortex and temporal poles bilaterally. Thinning also occurred in the cuneus, posterior cingulate and small scattered cortical regions. Areas of sparing included the occipital pole and the anterior and middle portions of the cingulate gyrus. There was no difference in cortical thickness between C9 + asymptomatic subjects and controls. When the group of 17 C9 + ALS and ALS-FTD patients were compared to the group of 22 sALS patients, C9 + ALS patients had thinner cortex in many areas, particularly in frontal and temporal regions (Fig. 2 B). Interestingly, the motor cortex was less thin (red, yellow) in C9 + ALS and ALS-FTD patients than in sALS patients.
Fig. 2

Regions of cortical thinning in whole-brain analyses of C9 + subjects compared to other groups are indicated in blue. A) Symptomatic C9 + subjects (n = 20) have diffuse patchy thinning, with broad swaths of thinning in frontal and temporal regions compared to healthy controls (n = 28). B) C9 + patients with ALS or ALS-FTD (n = 17) have patchy regions of thinning with a frontal predominance compared to sporadic ALS patients (n = 22). In contrast, sALS patients have thinner motor cortex than C9 + patients, best seen in this inflated view (yellow-orange areas). Vertex-wise comparison using FreeSurfer. (Fischl and Dale, 2000) The color scale indicates the negative log of the p values (threshold p = 0.05, FDR corrected).

Regional differences in cortical thickness

The mean cortical thickness of both left and right hemispheres was less in the C9 + subject group as a whole compared to healthy controls and to sALS patients in the baseline scans (Table 3). Among the C9 + subgroups, the mean cortical thickness was less in the C9 + ALS-FTD and C9 + ALS patients compared to controls. To determine which cortical areas most accounted for differences in the mean hemispheric thickness, a multivariate analysis was carried out on the 34 gyral regions of each hemisphere (Desikan et al., 2006) including age and gender as covariates. As predicted from the whole-brain vertex-wise analysis, the C9 + group had thinning in several non-motor regions compared to sALS patients and controls, particularly frontal regions. Regions with differences between groups are indicated by letters in Table 3. Both sALS and C9 + groups had thinning of the right precentral gyrus. The thickness of the left precentral and paracentral gyri, the insula, and the cingulate cortex was not significantly different between C9 +, sALS, and control groups.
Table 3

Thickness of selected cortical regions at the baseline scan.

Left hemisphere
Right hemisphere
Healthy controls(n = 28)C9 + subjects (all)(n = 27)Sporadic ALS(n = 22)SigHealthy controls(n = 28)C9 + subjects (all)(n = 27)Sporadic ALS(n = 22)Sig
Mean thickness (hemisphere)2.45 ± 0.092.33 ± 0.162.44 ± 0.11A, B2.44 ± 0.092.33 ± 0.172.43 ± 0.12A, B
Precentral2.56 ± 0.172.44 ± 0.212.40 ± 0.162.55 ± 0.162.40 ± 0.232.34 ± 0.19B, C
Paracentral2.44 ± 0.142.32 ± 0.182.37 ± 0.232.43 ± 0.142.28 ± 0.182.39 ± 0.20
Postcentral2.12 ± 0.122.05 ± 0.161.99 ± 0.132.10 ± 0.142.01 ± 0.211.97 ± 0.16
Insula2.95 ± 0.162.88 ± 0.212.94 ± 0.162.91 ± 0.152.83 ± 0.212.92 ± 0.18
Lateral orbitofrontal2.45 ± 0.122.38 ± 0.212.60 ± 0.12A2.41 ± 0.112.34 ± 0.182.49 ± 0.16A, C
Medial orbitofrontal2.37 ± 0.122.35 ± 0.212.35 ± 0.192.30 ± 0.122.26 ± 0.182.48 ± 0.17A
Rostral middle frontal2.30 ± 0.092.18 ± 0.182.32 ± 0.10A, B2.25 ± 0.092.16 ± 0.172.32 ± 0.13A
Superior frontal2.59 ± 0.092.47 ± 0.232.70 ± 0.13A2.56 ± 0.102.42 ± 0.192.68 ± 0.15A, B
Caudal middle frontal2.47 ± 0.092.35 ± 0.192.49 ± 0.12A, B2.45 ± 0.112.38 ± 0.192.44 ± 0.15
Lateral occipital2.20 ± 0.112.07 ± 0.142.20 ± 0.152.24 ± 0.132.14 ± 0.152.27 ± 0.14A
Fusiform2.74 ± 0.142.61 ± 0.212.65 ± 0.152.73 ± 0.152.58 ± 0.212.64 ± 0.14B
Middle temporal2.84 ± 0.162.72 ± 0.222.84 ± 0.202.80 ± 0.142.71 ± 0.202.88 ± 0.19A
Inferior parietal2.42 ± 0.102.30 ± 0.162.45 ± 0.16A, B2.42 ± 0.132.32 ± 0.182.43 ± 0.14

Means ± SD. Sig = significant differences, corrected for age and multiple comparisons p < 0.05.

A: C9 + < sALS, B: C9 + < HC, C: sALS < HC.

Cortical thickness of the regions that differed significantly from controls were compared between the subgroups of C9 + subjects and the sALS patients to look for differences associated with genotype. C9 + ALS patients had significant thinning of the superior frontal and orbitofrontal cortex bilaterally compared to sALS patients (Dunnett's test; p < 0.05). These regions were also thinner in the C9 + ALS-FTD and C9 + FTD subgroups than in sALS patients. The C9 + ALS-FTD and C9 + FTD subgroups also had thinning of several frontal and temporal regions, of which several were adjacent, compared to sALS patients (Supplemental Table 1). Asymptomatic C9 + subjects did not have any regions of thinning compared to sALS patients.

Longitudinal changes in thickness

Changes in regional cortical thickness between the baseline and 6-month follow-up scan were compared for the 19 C9 + subjects and the group of 23 healthy controls. The C9 + subject group included 5 asymptomatic subjects, 6 C9 + ALS, 5 C9 + ALS-FTD, and 3 C9 + bvFTD patients. Although the inter-scan intervals of C9 + group and control group were matched between groups, rates of thinning were analyzed to adjust for variation in inter-scan intervals. The rate of cortical thinning did not differ between healthy controls and the C9 + group as a whole or the C9 + subgroups.

Clinical correlations

Cortical thickness

Cortical thickness and letter fluency correlated with age, although the ALSFRS-R score did not. Therefore, age was included as a covariate, and partial correlations were calculated. There was a weak but significant correlation between the ALSFRS-R of the C9 + and sALS groups with the thickness of the precentral gyri bilaterally (right side r = 0.389, p = 0.007; left side r = 0.394, p = 0.006). The ALSFRS-R was not significantly correlated with thickness of other cortical regions. In contrast, the letter fluency score was correlated with the age-adjusted thickness of many cortical areas, with moderately strong correlations with the caudal middle frontal gyrus and pars opercularis bilaterally, the right pars orbitalis, and left entorhinal cortex (r = 0.5–0.7). Several other frontal, temporal, and parietal regions exhibited weaker correlations (r = 0.3–0.5) as did the precentral and paracentral gyri (Supplemental Table 2).

Volumes

The ALSFRS-R scores were not correlated with the baseline ventricular volume or volumes of subcortical structures of sALS and C9 + subjects. There was a weak correlation between the longitudinal change in ALSFRS-R and the change in ventricular volume (r = 0.489, p = 0.034) but significance did not survive correction for age. At baseline, letter fluency scores had a weak negative correlation with ventricular volume (r = − 0.352, p = 0.028) and a weak positive correlation with the volume of the thalamus (r = 0.446, p = 0.004) adjusted for age and gender.

Reproducibility of imaging measures with repeat scanning

In healthy controls, imaging measures of ventricular and all subcortical volumes were strongly correlated between scans at the 2 time points (Pearson's correlation coefficients: ventricular volume, r = 0.997; thalamus, r = 0.994; cerebellum, r = 0.929; caudate r = 0.986; putamen r = 0.971, pallidum 0.932. All p values < 0.0001). The measure of ventricular volume, expressed as %TIV, was highly reproducible in the two scans (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (ρc) = 0.9967). These data show that ventricular volume can be reliably measured in repeat scans from healthy controls who do not have ongoing degeneration. The healthy control group had minimal change in ventricular volume over 6 months (mean difference of − 0.22 ml/6-month), an order of magnitude less than symptomatic C9 + subjects. Although this finding may seem encouraging that the measurement of ventricular volume is sufficiently reliable to follow over time as a biomarker of progression, a power calculation based on data from the 14 symptomatic subjects with longitudinal imaging shows that relatively large sample sizes would be needed to detect the effects of an intervention between treated and untreated groups of C9 + symptomatic subjects. Using the measures of ventricular volume change in symptomatic C9 + subjects in this study, Table 4 shows the sample and effect sizes calculated for hypothetical interventions that reduce ventricular volume loss by 20–50% compared to no treatment. Detecting even a medium effect (0.5 < d > 0.3), would require sample sizes of 50 or more patients per group. This reflects, in part, the large variability between C9 + subjects.
Table 4

Sample sizes calculated to detect a 6-month difference in ventricular volume between a group of treated and untreated symptomatic C9 + subjects.

6-month mean ventricularvolume change (ml)Effect size(Cohen's d)Sample per grouppower = 0.8Sample per grouppower = 0.9
Current data: Symptomatic C9 +− 3.5
20% Improvement− 2.780.26232310
30% Improvement− 2.430.4195126
40% Improvement− 2.080.574965
50% Improvement− 1.740.743039
Regional measures of cortical thickness were also reproducible between the 2 scans, although correlations were weaker than for volume measures. For the 34 cortical regions of each hemisphere, thickness of each region at the two time points was strongly correlated and significant (r > 0.7, p < 0.0001), except for two regions, the right precuneus and right medial orbitofrontal cortex. For the other areas, correlation coefficients ranged from 0.748 to 0.966. Eighteen regions of the left hemisphere and 14 regions of the right hemisphere had very strong correlations (r > 0.9) between the two time points, including regions that would be of particular interest, such the precentral gyrus and several frontal and temporal regions (Supplemental Table 3).

Discussion

Persons with an expansion mutation of the C9orf72 gene had diffuse brain atrophy compared to healthy controls and sporadic ALS patients. Evidence of cortical and subcortical atrophy was seen in symptomatic C9orf72 carriers, regardless of whether their clinical phenotype was ALS, FTD, or ALS-FTD. Among the C9 + phenotypes, atrophy was most severe in C9 + patients with clinical features of bvFTD. However, even C9 + ALS patients without dementia had regions of thinning compared to sporadic ALS patients. Atrophy was the common underlying feature of disease associated with C9orf72 mutations. Because we did not detect significant atrophy in the asymptomatic C9 + subjects in this study, it is less likely to reflect a developmentally acquired condition. Over follow-up intervals up to 18 months, ventricular volumes remained stable in the clinically-stable asymptomatic C9 + subjects, whereas progressive ventricular enlargement was seen in symptomatic C9 + subjects. For this reason, we suggest that atrophy is directly associated with active disease, and that longitudinal imaging may reveal progression of disease. In sporadic bvFTD and sporadic ALS, pathological studies have led to the hypothesis that degeneration spreads from one region to another in a disease-specific pattern: progressing from rostral to caudal from the frontal cortex in bvFTD (Brettschneider et al., 2014, Kim et al., 2012) and spreading centrifugally from the motor cortex in sporadic ALS (Braak et al., 2013). Cross-sectional imaging studies of patients with sporadic ALS (Agosta et al., 2012, Roccatagliata et al., 2009, Verstraete et al., 2012, Kassubek et al., 2014) and sporadic FTD (Mahoney et al., 2012, Rohrer and Rosen, 2013, Huey et al., 2009), comparing patients at different stages of disease, have largely been consistent with these pathological hypotheses. A longitudinal study of sporadic ALS patients was also consistent, finding local grey matter loss in motor cortex earlier than in regions receiving motor cortical inputs, such as the frontal cortex and basal ganglia (Menke et al., 2014). Disease-specific patterns were not evident in the C9 + patients in this study. The C9 + clinical phenotypes were not differentiated by localized thinning or atrophy, but had thinning across many scattered cortical regions. In most patients, right and left sides were strongly correlated, without lateralized atrophy, as occurs in FTD patients with mutations in the GRN gene (Rohrer et al., 2015a). These findings suggesting a more diffuse spread of degeneration in C9orf72 related diseases. The findings of atrophy in symptomatic patients agree with earlier studies that compared groups of patients with sporadic ALS or FTD to C9orf72 patients with the same phenotype (Bede et al., 2013a, Byrne et al., 2012, Rohrer et al., 2015b, Whitwell et al., 2015). As in previous studies, cognitive impairment was associated with subcortical atrophy, notably thalamic atrophy, in C9orf72 ALS patients (Bede et al., 2013a, Bede et al., 2013b). The C9 + subjects with ALS-FTD and bvFTD in this study had smaller thalamic volumes, consistent with reports from other FTD patient populations (Rohrer et al., 2015a), as well as patchy cortical thinning. Letter fluency, the measure of executive function used in this study, has been shown to activate the left temporal lobe and several frontal regions in task-based fMRI (Cook et al., 2014, Abrahams et al., 2004). However, we found that letter fluency scores were correlated with cortical thinning in many regions, including the motor cortex. This may reflect the ease of disrupting cognitive networks for searching and retrieving words by letter. This study and others (Machts et al., 2015) highlight the importance of characterizing both motor and cognitive-behavioral function in patients with C9orf72 mutations. In this study, in which all C9 + subjects underwent the same testing for motor and cognitive function, a third of the C9 + subjects in this study met clinical criteria for both ALS and bvFTD. It is unknown whether the proportion of phenotypes in this sample is representative of their proportions in the population of C9orf72 mutation carriers. Population-based studies fully characterizing motor and cognitive symptoms would be needed to determine the relative proportions of each phenotype among the population of C9orf72 carriers. In one large US ALS clinic, 61 of 781 ALS patients carried the C9orf72 mutation (7.8%), and of these nine (14.8%) had comorbid FTD (Umoh et al., 2016). We had a higher proportion of co-morbid C9 + ALS and FTD in our study. This may reflect that patients whose symptoms begin with cognitive-behavioral symptoms, and later develop motor symptoms, are not represented in an ALS clinic population. Recruitment for this study reached out to memory clinics as well as ALS specialty clinics for referral of patients with C9orf72 mutations. We recognize as well that the patients in this study represent a selected group, willing to travel to participate in research. The longitudinal symptomatic C9 + patients showed considerable variability in clinical progression, with symptom durations ranging from 1 month to 88 months at the time of enrollment. A relatively indolent course prior to enrollment was present in one C9 + ALS patient as well as in several C9 + ALS-FTD patients whose first symptom was cognitive impairment. One limitation in evaluating the relationship between imaging findings and symptom duration was difficulty in pinpointing the onset of cognitive-behavioral changes. Additionally, some C9 + ALS patients who did not meet criteria for bvFTD may have had milder degrees of cognitive and behavioral impairment. The small sample size did not allow further gradations of cognitive impairment. Drop-out of rapidly progressing patients from 6-month follow-up scans is another potential source of bias. A 6-month follow-up interval was selected because it is a time span over which ALS patients deteriorate, and is also a typical time span for interventional clinical trials. However, because some rapidly progressing ALS patients were unable to return for scanning, the longitudinal cohort was enriched for asymptomatic C9 + and less impaired patients. More severely affected patients may have greater imaging changes, and thus the changes reported here may be an underestimate. Understanding whether imaging provides genotype- or phenotype-specific signatures, and the temporal relationship between imaging findings and clinical symptoms, is important to understand in a familial disease. Familial motor neuron disorders present an opportunity to identify imaging changes associated with early disease activity in presymptomatic gene carriers (Benatar and Wuu, 2012, Turner and Benatar, 2015). Studies in familial FTD patients identified changes in asymptomatic carriers who were 5–10 years younger than the typical age of disease onset in their family members (Rohrer et al., 2015b, Dopper et al., 2014). Similarly, metabolic changes have been identified in the spinal cord of asymptomatic carriers of the SOD1A mutation (Carew et al., 2011a). A study of asymptomatic C9orf72 gene carriers and non-carriers within a single large family found grey matter thinning in several cortical regions (Walhout et al., 2015). It is unclear whether genotype-specific imaging findings herald the onset of clinical disease. Although our study was unable to identify structural changes in asymptomatic carriers compared to healthy controls, longitudinal follow-up is needed to understand whether slowly developing changes occur, and whether imaging differences predict the development of clinical symptoms. In this study, we analyzed ventricular volume as a candidate biomarker for a number of reasons: enlarged ventricles are a visible abnormality seen in clinical scans, the scan-rescan reproducibility of ventricular volume with our methods was excellent for healthy controls, and ventricular size can be measured using a variety of different software programs. Moreover, ventricular enlargement may pick up atrophy from patchy cortical thinning, white matter atrophy, or mild subcortical atrophy when affected regions vary between individuals. Our finding of ventricular enlargement in the symptomatic C9 + group over 6 months is consistent with previous longitudinal studies in sporadic ALS that detected grey matter loss over a 6-month (Menke et al., 2014) or 1-year (Kwan et al., 2012) interval as well as a study that found annualized rates of atrophy in the range of 2–3% in bvFTD groups (Whitwell et al., 2015). While detecting changes in C9 + symptomatic patients over 6 months offers encouragement that imaging may be useful to follow disease progression in individuals within the time window of a typical therapeutic trial, the variability among individuals would require large sample sizes if ventricular enlargement were to be used as a sole biomarker. The variability might be improved with a better understanding of factors contributing to individual differences in disease onset and progression. Regardless, the change in ventricular volume may be useful to create a composite marker in combination with other measures. These could include other imaging modalities, such as diffusion imaging (Cardenas-Blanco et al., 2016, Muller et al., 2016) or spectroscopy (Carew et al., 2011b, Stagg et al., 2013), or biofluid markers such as the C9orf72 repeat-associated dipeptide (Su et al., 2014). Why C9orf72 mutations cause different phenotypes, even within the same family (Byrne et al., 2012) is not clear. Different phenotypes could result from distinct disease initiation sites that spread through synaptic connections, or from patient-specific vulnerabilities of different neurons to the molecular pathways disturbed by the C9orf72 mutation (Donnelly et al., 2013, Ling et al., 2013). Alternatively, C9orf72 mutations could be causing degeneration randomly in individual neurons throughout the brain, such that clinical symptoms become evident when brain networks fail (Schmidt et al., 2016, Schmidt et al., 2014, Lee et al., 2014). Whether the phenotypic variability of subjects with the C9orf72 mutation can be linked to selective vulnerability or patterns of spread through axonal networks, and how these might interact with genetic (van Blitterswijk et al., 2014) and epigenetic (McMillan et al., 2015) modifiers of clinical phenotypes of C9orf72, will need to be assessed in C9 + subjects scanned before and soon after onset of clinical symptoms. Studies of a larger numbers of C9orf72 carriers imaged before and after the onset of symptoms are needed to test whether disease spreads through networks or occurs randomly across the brain.

Conclusion

Symptomatic carriers of the C9orf72 expansion mutation exhibit more brain atrophy than healthy controls of a similar age. Atrophy occurs regardless of whether carriers present with an ALS or bvFTD clinical phenotype, although atrophy is greater in patients with cognitive-behavioral impairment. Ventricular enlargement and thalamic atrophy can be detected in groups of symptomatic patients over a 6-month interval. The following are the supplementary data related to this article.

Supplemental Table 1

Thickness of cortical regions at baseline scans.

Supplemental Table 2

Age-adjusted correlations of ALSFRS-R and Letter Fluency scores with regional cortical thickness.

Supplemental Table 3

Cortical regions with highly reproducible scan-rescan thickness measures (r > 0.90) in healthy controls.
  63 in total

1.  Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Progress towards a neuroimaging biomarker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Massimo Filippi; Federica Agosta; Julian Grosskreutz; Michael Benatar; Jan Kassubek; Esther Verstraete; Martin R Turner
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 3.  Presymptomatic studies in ALS: rationale, challenges, and approach.

Authors:  Michael Benatar; Joanne Wuu
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis--a model of corticofugal axonal spread.

Authors:  Heiko Braak; Johannes Brettschneider; Albert C Ludolph; Virginia M Lee; John Q Trojanowski; Kelly Del Tredici
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 5.  Neuroimaging in frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rohrer; Howard J Rosen
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04

Review 6.  Phenotypic signatures of genetic frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rohrer; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 7.  C9orf72 expansions in frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rohrer; Adrian M Isaacs; Sarah Mizielinska; Simon Mead; Tammaryn Lashley; Selina Wray; Katie Sidle; Pietro Fratta; Richard W Orrell; John Hardy; Janice Holton; Tamas Revesz; Martin N Rossor; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 44.182

8.  Widespread grey matter pathology dominates the longitudinal cerebral MRI and clinical landscape of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Ricarda A L Menke; Sonja Körner; Nicola Filippini; Gwenaëlle Douaud; Steven Knight; Kevin Talbot; Martin R Turner
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Correlation between structural and functional connectivity impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Ruben Schmidt; Esther Verstraete; Marcel A de Reus; Jan H Veldink; Leonard H van den Berg; Martijn P van den Heuvel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Patterns of regional cerebellar atrophy in genetic frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Martina Bocchetta; M Jorge Cardoso; David M Cash; Sebastien Ourselin; Jason D Warren; Jonathan D Rohrer
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 4.881

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  The imaging signature of C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansions: implications for clinical trials and therapy development.

Authors:  Stacey Li Hi Shing; Mary Clare McKenna; We Fong Siah; Rangariroyashe H Chipika; Orla Hardiman; Peter Bede
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.978

2.  Phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain: A biomarker of survival for C9ORF72-associated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Tania F Gendron; Lillian M Daughrity; Michael G Heckman; Nancy N Diehl; Joanne Wuu; Timothy M Miller; Pau Pastor; John Q Trojanowski; Murray Grossman; James D Berry; William T Hu; Antonia Ratti; Michael Benatar; Vincenzo Silani; Jonathan D Glass; Mary Kay Floeter; Andreas Jeromin; Kevin B Boylan; Leonard Petrucelli
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 3.  Neuroimaging in genetic frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Suvi Häkkinen; Stephanie A Chu; Suzee E Lee
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.996

4.  Electrical impedance myography (EIM) in a natural history study of C9ORF72 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Michelle B Offit; Tianxia Wu; Mary Kay Floeter; Tanya J Lehky
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 5.  Pre-symptomatic radiological changes in frontotemporal dementia: propagation characteristics, predictive value and implications for clinical trials.

Authors:  Mary Clare McKenna; Jasmin Lope; Ee Ling Tan; Peter Bede
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.224

Review 6.  Role of Optical Coherence Tomography in Identifying Retinal Biomarkers in Frontotemporal Dementia: A Review.

Authors:  Omar Moinuddin; Nikhila S Khandwala; Kelly Z Young; Sanjana K Sathrasala; Sami J Barmada; Roger L Albin; Cagri G Besirli
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-08

7.  Early Cognitive, Structural, and Microstructural Changes in Presymptomatic C9orf72 Carriers Younger Than 40 Years.

Authors:  Anne Bertrand; Junhao Wen; Daisy Rinaldi; Marion Houot; Sabrina Sayah; Agnès Camuzat; Clémence Fournier; Sabrina Fontanella; Alexandre Routier; Philippe Couratier; Florence Pasquier; Marie-Odile Habert; Didier Hannequin; Olivier Martinaud; Paola Caroppo; Richard Levy; Bruno Dubois; Alexis Brice; Stanley Durrleman; Olivier Colliot; Isabelle Le Ber
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 18.302

8.  Loss of functional connectivity is an early imaging marker in primary lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Michael G Clark; Rachel Smallwood Shoukry; Caleb J Huang; Laura E Danielian; Devin Bageac; Mary Kay Floeter
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.092

9.  Progressive Neurochemical Abnormalities in Cognitive and Motor Subgroups of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Daniel Ta; Abdullah Ishaque; Ojas Srivastava; Chris Hanstock; Peter Seres; Dean T Eurich; Collin Luk; Hannah Briemberg; Richard Frayne; Angela L Genge; Simon J Graham; Lawrence Korngut; Lorne Zinman; Sanjay Kalra
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 11.800

10.  MRI-guided histology of TDP-43 knock-in mice implicates parvalbumin interneuron loss, impaired neurogenesis and aberrant neurodevelopment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Ziqiang Lin; Eugene Kim; Mohi Ahmed; Gang Han; Camilla Simmons; Yushi Redhead; Jack Bartlett; Luis Emiliano Pena Altamira; Isobel Callaghan; Matthew A White; Nisha Singh; Stephen Sawiak; Tara Spires-Jones; Anthony C Vernon; Michael P Coleman; Jeremy Green; Christopher Henstridge; Jeffrey S Davies; Diana Cash; Jemeen Sreedharan
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.