Literature DB >> 26977398

Patterns of regional cerebellar atrophy in genetic frontotemporal dementia.

Martina Bocchetta1, M Jorge Cardoso2, David M Cash2, Sebastien Ourselin3, Jason D Warren1, Jonathan D Rohrer4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder with a strong genetic component. The cerebellum has not traditionally been felt to be involved in FTD but recent research has suggested a potential role.
METHODS: We investigated the volumetry of the cerebellum and its subregions in a cohort of 44 patients with genetic FTD (20 MAPT, 7 GRN, and 17 C9orf72 mutation carriers) compared with 18 cognitively normal controls. All groups were matched for age and gender. On volumetric T1-weighted magnetic resonance brain images we used an atlas propagation and label fusion strategy of the Diedrichsen cerebellar atlas to automatically extract subregions including the cerebellar lobules, the vermis and the deep nuclei.
RESULTS: The global cerebellar volume was significantly smaller in C9orf72 carriers (mean (SD): 99989 (8939) mm(3)) compared with controls (108136 (7407) mm(3)). However, no significant differences were seen in the MAPT and GRN carriers compared with controls (104191 (6491) mm(3) and 107883 (6205) mm(3) respectively). Investigating the individual subregions, C9orf72 carriers had a significantly lower volume than controls in lobule VIIa-Crus I (15% smaller, p < 0.0005), whilst MAPT mutation carriers had a significantly lower vermal volume (10% smaller, p = 0.001) than controls. All cerebellar subregion volumes were preserved in GRN carriers compared with controls.
CONCLUSION: There appears to be a differential pattern of cerebellar atrophy in the major genetic forms of FTD, being relatively spared in GRN, localized to the lobule VIIa-Crus I in the superior-posterior region of the cerebellum in C9orf72, the area connected via the thalamus to the prefrontal cortex and involved in cognitive function, and localized to the vermis in MAPT, the 'limbic cerebellum' involved in emotional processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C9orf72; Cerebellum; Genetic frontotemporal dementia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26977398      PMCID: PMC4781923          DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage Clin        ISSN: 2213-1582            Impact factor:   4.881


Introduction

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a clinically, pathologically and genetically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder, commonly presenting with progressive impairment in behaviour (behavioural variant FTD, bvFTD) or language (primary progressive aphasia, PPA). Around a third of patients with FTD have an autosomal dominant mutation in one of three genes: microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT), progranulin (GRN) and chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) (Rohrer and Warren, 2011). Neuroimaging and pathological studies of FTD have emphasized the key roles of the frontal, temporal, insular and cingulate cortices as well as subcortical structures such as the striatum and thalamus, but minimal attention has been paid to the potential role of the cerebellum. Although its function has traditionally been felt to be related solely to the co-ordination of movement, research over the past twenty years has highlighted a role for the cerebellum in cognitive and emotional processing (Schmahmann, 1991, D'Angelo and Casali, 2013, Middleton and Strick, 2000, Strick et al., 2009, Makris et al., 2003). It is extensively connected with different brain regions, including key areas involved in FTD, e.g. via the thalamus to the prefrontal cortex (Behrens et al., 2003, Palesi et al., 2015), and to the limbic system via a direct cerebello-limbic pathway (Arrigo et al., 2014). Interest in the cerebellum in FTD has arisen from the association of C9orf72 mutations with cerebellar pathology at post-mortem and a number of voxel-based morphometry MRI studies have now found involvement of the cerebellum in this group (Whitwell et al., 2012, Irwin et al., 2013, Mahoney et al., 2012, Rohrer et al., 2015). However detailed region of interest studies have not been performed, nor direct comparison across the different major genetic forms of FTD. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the volume of the cerebellum and its subregions in a cohort of genetic FTD patients, and to determine whether specific cerebellar regions are associated with genetic mutations in MAPT, GRN and C9orf72 genes.

Methods

We reviewed the UCL Dementia Research Centre FTD database to identify all patients who were symptomatic carriers of a mutation in the MAPT, GRN or C9orf72 genes and who had also undergone a volumetric T1-weighted MRI. 44 patients were identified: 20 MAPT (19 with bvFTD and one with a corticobasal syndrome), 7 GRN (3 bvFTD and 4 PPA) and 17 C9orf72 (13 bvFTD, 2 FTD with motor neurone disease and 2 PPA). No significant differences were seen in age at scan (p = 0.071, Kruskal–Wallis test) or gender (p = 0.301 Chisquare test) between the groups: 57.6 (7.1) years for MAPT (75% male), 63.0 (7.0) years for GRN (43% male) and 61.4 (6.7) years for C9orf72 (65% male). Disease duration at time of scan was significantly different between the groups (p = 0.026, Kruskal–Wallis test): 7.0 (4.3) years for MAPT, 2.7 (1.9) for GRN and 6.0 (4.1) years for C9orf72. However, each genetic FTD cause is known to vary in its disease progression and so we examined whole brain volume (corrected for total intracranial volume, TIV) as a proxy of overall disease stage. No significant differences were seen between the groups (p = 0.610, Kruskal–Wallis test): 1108.8 (388.7) cm3 for MAPT, 1118.9 (411.7) cm3 for GRN and 1098.1 (661) cm3 for C9orf72, suggesting that the groups were approximately matched for disease severity. Eighteen cognitively normal subjects, with a similar age and gender to the carriers, were identified as controls: 56.4 (14.3) years (50% male). The study was approved by the local ethics committee and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Raw MR images were pre-processed to correct for magnetic field bias (inhomogeneity) using a non-parametric non-uniform intensity normalization (N3) algorithm (Sled et al., 1998, Boyes et al., 2008). We then used an atlas propagation and label fusion strategy of the Diedrichsen cerebellar atlas to automatically extract subregions of the cerebellum: the cerebellar lobules (I-IV, V, VI, VIIa-Crus I, VIIa-Crus II, VIIb, VIIIa, VIIIb, IX and X), the vermis and the deep nuclei (dentate, interposed and fastigial) (Cardoso et al., 2015, Diedrichsen et al., 2009, Diedrichsen et al., 2011). No significant asymmetry was noted in the volumes and so right and left-sided results were combined for each subregion. All volumes were corrected for TIV, which was calculated using the Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) 12 software, version 6470 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm), running under Matlab R2014b (Math Works, Natick, MA, USA) (Malone et al., 2015). Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) version 22.0, with differences in volumes of the cerebellar lobules, vermis and deep nuclei between all groups tested using the Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

C9orf72 mutation carriers showed the lowest global cerebellar volume (mean (SD): 99989 (8939) mm3), significantly smaller than controls (108136 (7407) mm3, p = 0.006 on Mann–Whitney U test), and the GRN group (107883 (6205) mm3, p = 0.028), but not from the MAPT group (104191 (6491) mm3; p = 0.080). No significant differences were seen in the GRN or MAPT groups in comparison with each other or the control group (p = 0.196, MAPT versus controls; p = 0.836, GRN versus controls; p = 0.370, GRN versus MAPT). For the 14 individual subregions of the cerebellum, a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was made so that only a threshold of p < 0.003 was considered significant. The C9orf72 group showed a significantly lower volume compared with controls of the lobule VIIa-Crus I only (p < 0.0005, 15.2% smaller than controls), whilst the MAPT group showed a significantly lower volume of the vermis only (p = 0.001, 9.5% smaller than controls) (Table 1 and Fig. 1). No other subregion reached statistical significance but there was a trend for lower volumes of the interposed nuclei in both the C9orf72 and MAPT groups compared with controls (p = 0.004 and p = 0.007, respectively). GRN carriers showed preserved cerebellar volumetry with no significant differences from controls.
Table 1

Volumetry of cerebellar subregions in 18 healthy non-carrier controls and 44 genetic FTD patients. Values denote mean and standard deviation (SD) volumes in mm3 or n (%). p-values denote significance on Mann–Whitney U test. Bold represents a significant difference between groups after correcting for multiple comparisons.


Controls (18)
C9orf72 (17)
MAPT (20)
GRN (7)
C9orf72 vs Controls
MAPT vs Controls
GRN vs Controls
C9orf72
MAPT
GRN
GRN vs C9orf72
GRN vs MAPT
C9orf72 vs MAPT
StructureMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDp-Valuep-Valuep-Value% difference vs controls% difference vs controls% difference vs controlsp-Valuep-Valuep-Value
Lobule I–IV62366706363861625043370536740.6600.5340.012− 2.0− 0.2− 13.10.0990.0130.775
Lobule V89118978623905892274293717370.5030.5530.1253.2− 0.1− 5.20.0340.1450.311
Lobule VI1563914521458720001527713901659019300.0670.5340.2446.72.3− 6.10.0340.1040.133
Lobule VIIa-Crus I210912467178851984203603303192982237< 0.00050.6750.12515.23.58.50.0990.4980.013
Lobule VIIa-Crus II176102311158072863160151822176667520.0670.0330.53410.29.1− 0.30.1470.0360.845
Lobule VIIb75658027330976748878174606110.4830.5150.5343.11.01.40.9510.8500.729
Lobule VIIIa77997047724927795755880337560.9090.3610.4951.0− 2.0− 3.00.5340.7660.517
Lobule VIIIb745190069268947318107772338340.2450.8060.7907.01.82.90.2880.6850.270
Lobule IX62008285563799552070956598640.0130.0100.15810.311.08.70.3180.5330.988
Lobule X860888501089091248821460.8830.2281.0001.1− 5.7− 2.60.7570.6070.149
Vermis50343754624584455441248624080.0250.0010.2978.19.53.40.2600.1450.940
Dentate nuclei32914263303406321442233255241.0000.3610.836− 0.42.3− 1.00.9510.7660.341
Interposed nuclei392443513135731394540.0040.0070.83610.48.9− 0.40.0990.1040.821
Fastigial nuclei571051651656100.0620.0330.83610.511.10.90.1470.1040.988
Fig. 1

Segmentation of the cerebellar lobules and deep nuclei (left side) mapped on a T1-weighted 3T MR image of a control subject. On the right panel significant volumetric differences in FTD are mapped on the same MR image.

Discussion

We found a differential pattern of regional cerebellar involvement in the different genetic forms of FTD: lobule VIIA-Crus I in C9orf72, the vermis in MAPT, and sparing in the GRN group. Lobule VIIa-Crus I has been associated with cognitive processing including the direction of complex goal-directed behaviours, through its connections via the ventrolateral and ventroanterior thalamus to the prefrontal cortex (Makris et al., 2003, Palesi et al., 2015, D'Angelo and Casali, 2013). Although the vermis is involved in the integration of sensory input with motor commands (Bogovic et al., 2013, Schmahmann, 2000, Makris et al., 2003), it is also considered the ‘limbic cerebellum’, involved in the modulation of emotions and social behaviours, based on its connections with the limbic brain structures (Schmahmann, 2000, Stoodley and Schmahmman, 2009, Arrigo et al., 2014, Makris et al., 2003). The involvement of the cerebellum, and particularly the superior-posterior area, in C9orf72 mutation carriers is consistent with previous studies (Whitwell et al., 2012, Irwin et al., 2013, Mahoney et al., 2012), but here is localized to a specific lobule (VIIa–Crus I) which is known to be linked to the thalamus, a key area of atrophy in C9orf72 carriers, and then on to the prefrontal cortex (Behrens et al., 2003, Palesi et al., 2015). Degeneration of a cerebello-thalamic-cortical network has been proposed to underpin disturbances of body schema and related neuropsychiatric symptoms in this group (Downey et al., 2014), and is an early (presymptomatic) feature of the disease (Rohrer et al., 2015). Identification of vermal involvement in MAPT carriers in this region of interest study is unsurprising given what is known about the pattern of atrophy in this group, where limbic structures are predominantly involved, particularly the amygdala, hippocampus and hypothalamus, which are linked to the cerebellum via the cerebello-limbic pathway (Rohrer et al., 2010, Bocchetta et al., 2015). Patients with MAPT mutations commonly present with impaired social conduct and behaviour, and it is likely that degeneration across the limbic network leads directly to these symptoms. There is a clear trend to involvement of the interposed nuclei in both C9orf72 and MAPT groups. As part of the deep cerebellar nuclei, they receive intrinsic inputs from the cerebellar cortex to be sent to the other cortical regions via the ventroanterior and ventrolateral thalamic nuclei (Granziera et al., 2009, Makris et al., 2003), and are likely to be part of the cerebello-thalamic-cortical network in C9orf72 carriers and the cerebello-limbic network in MAPT carriers. In summary, we found that mutations in MAPT and C9orf72 have a differential impact on the cerebellum with GRN carriers having no significant impact. The regions involved are part of different brain networks that are intrinsically linked to the development of the symptoms seen in each of these genetic disorders. It will be important to investigate how early these regions may become affected using data from presymptomatic FTD cohorts such as GENFI (Rohrer et al., 2015). Furthermore, future studies on functional and structural connections of the cerebellum will be helpful in clarifying the role of these networks in genetic FTD.

Disclosures

JDR is an MRC Clinician Scientist (MR/M008525/1) and has received funding from the NIHR Rare Diseases Translational Research Collaboration (BRC149/NS/MH). JDW is supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Clinical Fellowship (091673/Z/10/Z). SO is funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/H046410/1, EP/J020990/1, EP/K005278), the Medical Research Council (MR/J01107X/1), the EU-FP7 project VPH-DARE@IT (FP7- ICT-2011-9-601055), and the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR BRC UCLH/UCL High Impact Initiative BW.mn.BRC10269). All other authors have nothing to disclose.
  25 in total

Review 1.  Basal ganglia and cerebellar loops: motor and cognitive circuits.

Authors:  F A Middleton; P L Strick
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils.

Authors:  Richard G Boyes; Jeff L Gunter; Chris Frost; Andrew L Janke; Thomas Yeatman; Derek L G Hill; Matt A Bernstein; Paul M Thompson; Michael W Weiner; Norbert Schuff; Gene E Alexander; Ronald J Killiany; Charles DeCarli; Clifford R Jack; Nick C Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  An emerging concept. The cerebellar contribution to higher function.

Authors:  J D Schmahmann
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1991-11

4.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.

Authors:  J G Sled; A P Zijdenbos; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Cognitive decline and reduced survival in C9orf72 expansion frontotemporal degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  David J Irwin; Corey T McMillan; Johannes Brettschneider; David J Libon; John Powers; Katya Rascovsky; Jon B Toledo; Ashley Boller; Jonathan Bekisz; Keerthi Chandrasekaran; Elisabeth McCarty Wood; Leslie M Shaw; John H Woo; Philip A Cook; David A Wolk; Steven E Arnold; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Leo F McCluskey; Lauren Elman; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski; Murray Grossman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Human cerebellum: surface-assisted cortical parcellation and volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nikos Makris; Steven M Hodge; Christian Haselgrove; David N Kennedy; Anders Dale; Bruce Fischl; Bruce R Rosen; Gordon Harris; Verne S Caviness; Jeremy D Schmahmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Phenotypic signatures of genetic frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rohrer; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.710

8.  Geodesic Information Flows: Spatially-Variant Graphs and Their Application to Segmentation and Fusion.

Authors:  M Jorge Cardoso; Marc Modat; Robin Wolz; Andrew Melbourne; David Cash; Daniel Rueckert; Sebastien Ourselin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Neuroimaging signatures of frontotemporal dementia genetics: C9ORF72, tau, progranulin and sporadics.

Authors:  Jennifer L Whitwell; Stephen D Weigand; Bradley F Boeve; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez; Nicola J Rutherford; Matthew Baker; David S Knopman; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson; Ronald C Petersen; Rosa Rademakers; Clifford R Jack; Keith A Josephs
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Contralateral cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathways with prominent involvement of associative areas in humans in vivo.

Authors:  Fulvia Palesi; Jacques-Donald Tournier; Fernando Calamante; Nils Muhlert; Gloria Castellazzi; Declan Chard; Egidio D'Angelo; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.270

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  The imaging signature of C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansions: implications for clinical trials and therapy development.

Authors:  Stacey Li Hi Shing; Mary Clare McKenna; We Fong Siah; Rangariroyashe H Chipika; Orla Hardiman; Peter Bede
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.978

2.  Dementia: Cerebellar atrophy has disease-specific patterns.

Authors:  Ian Fyfe
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 3.  Neuroimaging in Dementia.

Authors:  Adam M Staffaroni; Fanny M Elahi; Dana McDermott; Kacey Marton; Elissaios Karageorgiou; Simone Sacco; Matteo Paoletti; Eduardo Caverzasi; Christopher P Hess; Howard J Rosen; Michael D Geschwind
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.420

4.  Dynamic expression of the mouse orthologue of the human amyotropic lateral sclerosis associated gene C9orf72 during central nervous system development and neuronal differentiation.

Authors:  Ross Ferguson; Eleni Serafeimidou-Pouliou; Vasanta Subramanian
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Climbing fiber-Purkinje cell synaptic pathology in tremor and cerebellar degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Sheng-Han Kuo; Chi-Ying Lin; Jie Wang; Peter A Sims; Ming-Kai Pan; Jyun-You Liou; Danielle Lee; William J Tate; Geoffrey C Kelly; Elan D Louis; Phyllis L Faust
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 17.088

6.  Cerebellar Regional Dissection for Molecular Analysis.

Authors:  Katherine A Hamel; Marija Cvetanovic
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 7.  Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia: The Current State of Genetics and Genetic Testing Since the Advent of Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Jill S Goldman; Vivianna M Van Deerlin
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.074

8.  Transcriptomic analysis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 pathology reveals cellular alterations across multiple brain regions.

Authors:  Rahat Hasan; Jack Humphrey; Conceição Bettencourt; Jia Newcombe; Tammaryn Lashley; Pietro Fratta; Towfique Raj
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 17.088

9.  Accuracy and generalization capability of an automatic method for the detection of typical brain hypometabolism in prodromal Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Fabrizio De Carli; Flavio Nobili; Marco Pagani; Matteo Bauckneht; Federico Massa; Matteo Grazzini; Cathrine Jonsson; Enrico Peira; Silvia Morbelli; Dario Arnaldi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Automated quantitative MRI volumetry reports support diagnostic interpretation in dementia: a multi-rater, clinical accuracy study.

Authors:  Hugh G Pemberton; Olivia Goodkin; Ferran Prados; Ravi K Das; Sjoerd B Vos; James Moggridge; William Coath; Elizabeth Gordon; Ryan Barrett; Anne Schmitt; Hefina Whiteley-Jones; Christian Burd; Mike P Wattjes; Sven Haller; Meike W Vernooij; Lorna Harper; Nick C Fox; Ross W Paterson; Jonathan M Schott; Sotirios Bisdas; Mark White; Sebastien Ourselin; John S Thornton; Tarek A Yousry; M Jorge Cardoso; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.