| Literature DB >> 27994654 |
Yi-Ying Lee1, Chieh-Tien Wang2, Steven Kuan-Hua Huang3, Wen-Jeng Wu4, Chun-Nung Huang5, Ching-Chia Li4, Ti-Chun Chan6, Peir-In Liang7, Chung-Hsi Hsing8, Chien-Feng Li9.
Abstract
Background: The TP53 tumor suppressor gene plays a crucial role in the carcinogenesis of many malignancies, including urothelial carcinoma (UC). Overexpression of p53 is associated with poor prognosis in UC. Recently, RING finger protein 128 (RNF128) was shown to be involved in p53-induced apoptosis, forming a negative feedback loop. However, the significance of RNF128 in patients with UC remains unknown. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the expression of RNF128 in UC and to assess its predictive and prognostic value in a well-established cohort.Entities:
Keywords: Grail; RNF128; prognosis.; urothelial carcinoma
Year: 2016 PMID: 27994654 PMCID: PMC5166527 DOI: 10.7150/jca.16798
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Figure 1Data mining on a public transcriptomic dataset of urothelial carcinoma. By reappraising the published transcriptomic dataset of urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma (GSE31684), RNF128 is identified as the most significantly downregulated gene associated with cancer invasiveness and metastasis in clustering analysis focusing on cytokine biosynthetic process (GO:0042036). Specimens from high pT (blue lines) and low pT (yellow lines) are indicated on top of the heatmap, and upregulation and downregulation of genes are illustrated as a spectrum of brightness of red and green, respectively. Those with unaltered mRNA expression are coded as black.
Summary of differentially expressed genes associated with negative regulation of cytokine biosynthetic process (GO:0042036) and showed positive associations to cancer invasiveness and metastasis in the transcriptome of urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma (GSE31684).
| Probe | Comparing T2-4 to Ta-T1 | Comparing Meta. to Non-Meta.# | Gene Symbol | Gene Title | Molecular Function | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| log ratio | p-value | log ratio | p-value | ||||
| 219263_at | -2.385 | <0.0001 | -1.1327 | 0.0093 | RING finger protein 128 | ligase activity, metal ion binding, protein binding, ubiquitin-protein ligase activity, zinc ion binding | |
#, Meta., distal metastasis developed during follow-up; Non-Meta.: no metastatic event developed.
Correlations between RNF128 Expression and other important clinicopathological parameters in urothelial carcinomas.
| Parameter | Category | Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma | Urinary Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case No. | RNF128 Expression | p-value | Case No. | RNF128 Expression | p-value | ||||
| High | Low | High | Low | ||||||
| Gender | Male | 158 | 78 | 80 | 0.277 | 216 | 104 | 112 | 0.339 |
| Female | 182 | 92 | 90 | 79 | 43 | 36 | |||
| Age (years) | < 65 | 138 | 68 | 70 | 0.825 | 121 | 64 | 57 | 0.380 |
| ≥ 65 | 202 | 102 | 100 | 174 | 83 | 91 | |||
| Tumor location | Renal pelvis | 141 | 67 | 74 | 0.727 | - | - | - | - |
| Ureter | 150 | 77 | 73 | - | - | - | - | ||
| Renal pelvis & ureter | 49 | 26 | 23 | - | - | - | - | ||
| Multifocality | Single | 278 | 140 | 138 | 0.779 | - | - | - | - |
| Multifocal | 62 | 30 | 32 | - | - | - | - | ||
| Primary tumor (T) | Ta | 89 | 69 | 20 | 84 | 57 | 27 | ||
| T1 | 92 | 55 | 37 | 88 | 49 | 39 | |||
| T2-T4 | 159 | 46 | 113 | 123 | 41 | 82 | |||
| Nodal metastasis | Negative (N0) | 312 | 167 | 145 | 266 | 141 | 125 | ||
| Positive (N1-N3) | 28 | 3 | 25 | 29 | 6 | 23 | |||
| Histological grade | Low grade | 56 | 45 | 11 | 56 | 35 | 21 | ||
| High grade | 284 | 125 | 159 | 239 | 112 | 127 | |||
| Vascular invasion | Absent | 234 | 138 | 96 | 246 | 131 | 115 | ||
| Present | 106 | 32 | 74 | 49 | 16 | 33 | |||
| Perineural invasion | Absent | 321 | 168 | 153 | 275 | 141 | 134 | 0.066 | |
| Present | 19 | 2 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 14 | |||
| Mitotic rate (per 10 high power fields) | < 10 | 173 | 100 | 73 | 139 | 79 | 60 | ||
| >= 10 | 167 | 70 | 97 | 156 | 68 | 88 | |||
*Statisttically significant.
Univariate log-rank and multivariate analyses for Disease-specific and Metastasis-free Survivals in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
| Parameter | Category | Case No. | Disease-specific Survival | Metastasis-free Survival | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||||
| No. of event | p-value | R.R. | 95% C.I. | p-value | No. of event | p-value | R.R. | 95% C.I. | p-value | |||
| Male | 158 | 28 | 0.8286 | - | - | - | 32 | 0.7904 | - | - | - | |
| Female | 182 | 33 | - | - | - | 38 | - | - | - | |||
| < 65 | 138 | 26 | 0.9943 | - | - | - | 30 | 0.8470 | - | - | - | |
| ≥ 65 | 202 | 35 | - | - | - | 40 | - | - | - | |||
| Right | 177 | 34 | 0.7366 | - | - | - | 38 | 0.3074 | - | - | - | |
| Left | 154 | 26 | - | - | - | 32 | - | - | - | |||
| Bilateral | 9 | 1 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - | |||
| Renal pelvis | 141 | 24 | 1 | - | 0.560 | 31 | 0.0659 | - | - | - | ||
| Ureter | 150 | 22 | 0.859 | 0.460-1.602 | 25 | - | - | - | ||||
| Renal pelvis & ureter | 49 | 15 | 1.845 | 0.491-6.935 | 14 | - | - | - | ||||
| Single | 273 | 48 | 1 | - | 0.482 | 52 | 1 | - | ||||
| Multifocal | 62 | 18 | 1.578 | 1.400-6.540 | 18 | 2.790 | 1.563-4.980 | |||||
| Ta | 89 | 2 | 1 | - | 0.130 | 4 | 1 | - | 0.135 | |||
| T1 | 92 | 9 | 3.123 | 0.654-14.903 | 15 | 3.216 | 0.678-15.265 | |||||
| T2-T4 | 159 | 50 | 4.633 | 1.005-21.347 | 51 | 4.606 | 1.005-21.116 | |||||
*Statistically significant.
Univariate log-rank and multivariate analyses for Disease-specific and Metastasis-free Survivals in urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma.
| Parameter | Category | Case No. | Disease-specific Survival | Metastasis-free Survival | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||||
| No. of event | p-value | R.R. | 95% C.I. | p-value | No. of event | p-value | R.R. | 95% C.I. | p-value | |||
| Gender | Male | 216 | 41 | 0.4446 | - | - | - | 60 | 0.2720 | - | - | - |
| Female | 79 | 11 | - | - | - | 16 | - | - | - | |||
| Age (years) | < 65 | 121 | 17 | 0.1136 | - | - | - | 31 | 0.6875 | - | - | - |
| ≥ 65 | 174 | 35 | - | - | - | 45 | - | - | - | |||
| Primary tumor (T) | Ta | 84 | 1 | <0.0001* | 1 | - | 0.001* | 4 | <0.0001* | 1 | - | 0.009* |
| T1 | 88 | 9 | 5.706 | 0.655-49.677 | 23 | 4.754 | 1.430-15.800 | |||||
| T2-T4 | 123 | 42 | 19.576 | 2.351-163.031 | 49 | 6.533 | 1.951-21.881 | |||||
| Nodal metastasis | Negative (N0) | 266 | 41 | 0.0002* | 1 | - | 0.753 | 61 | <0.0001* | 1 | - | 0.075 |
| Positive (N1-N3) | 29 | 11 | 1.121 | 0.524-2.169 | 15 | 1.767 | 0.943-3.311 | |||||
| Histological grade | Low grade | 56 | 2 | 0.0013* | 1 | - | 0.731 | 5 | 0.0007* | 1 | - | 0.988 |
| High grade | 239 | 50 | 1.312 | 0.279-6.170 | 71 | 0.922 | 0.342-2.876 | |||||
| Vascular invasion | Absent | 246 | 37 | 0.0024* | 1 | - | 0.254 | 54 | 0.0001* | 1 | - | 0.790 |
| Present | 49 | 15 | 0.666 | 0.332-1.339 | 22 | 1.087 | 0.588-2.011 | |||||
| Perineural invasion | Absent | 275 | 44 | 0.0001* | 1 | - | 0.037* | 66 | 0.0007* | 1 | - | 0.143 |
| Present | 20 | 8 | 2.444 | 1.054-5.667 | 10 | 1.740 | 0.829-3.654 | |||||
| Mitotic rate (per 10 high power fields) | < 10 | 139 | 12 | <0.0001* | 1 | - | 0.016* | 23 | <0.0001* | 1 | - | 0.028* |
| >= 10 | 156 | 40 | 2.292 | 1.169-4.491 | 53 | 1.785 | 1.065-2.992 | |||||
| RNF128 expression | High | 147 | 12 | <0.0001* | 1 | - | 0.003* | 26 | 0.0002* | 1 | - | 0.036* |
| Low | 148 | 20 | 2.765 | 1.406-5.437 | 50 | 1.712 | 1.035-2.830 | |||||
*Statistically significant.