Literature DB >> 27994002

Effects of Framing Proximal Benefits of Quitting and Motivation to Quit as a Query on Communications About Tobacco Constituents.

Sarah Kowitt1, Paschal Sheeran2, Kristen Jarman3, Leah M Ranney4, Allison M Schmidt1, Li-Ling Huang3, Adam O Goldstein3,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Little is known on how to communicate messages on tobacco constituents to tobacco users. This study manipulated three elements of a message in the context of a theory-based communication campaign about tobacco constituents: (1) latency of response efficacy (how soon expected health benefits would accrue), (2) self-efficacy (confidence about quitting), and (3) interrogative cue ("Ready to be tobacco-free?").
METHODS: Smokers (N = 1669, 55.4% women) were recruited via an online platform, and were randomized to a 3 (Latency of response efficacy) × 2 (Self-efficacy) × 2 (Interrogative cue) factorial design. The dependent variables were believability, credibility, perceived effectiveness of the communication message, and action expectancies (likelihood of seeking additional information and help with quitting).
RESULTS: Latency of response efficacy influenced believability, perceived effectiveness, credibility, and action expectancies. In each case, scores were higher when specific health benefits were said to accrue within 1 month, as compared to general health benefits occurring in a few hours. The interrogative cue had a marginal positive effect on perceived effectiveness. The self-efficacy manipulation had no reliable effects, and there were no significant interactions among conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Smokers appear less persuaded by a communication message on constituents where general health benefits accrue immediately (within a few hours) than specific benefits over a longer timeframe (1 month). Additionally, smokers appeared to be more persuaded by messages with an interrogative cue. Such findings may help design more effective communication campaigns on tobacco constituents to smokers. IMPLICATIONS: This paper describes, for the first time, how components of tobacco constituent messages are perceived. We now know that smokers appear to be less persuaded by communication messages where general health benefits accrue immediately (within a few hours) than specific benefits over a longer timeframe (1 month). Additionally, including an interrogative cue ("Ready to be tobacco free?") may make messages more effective, whereas the self-efficacy manipulation designed to increase confidence about quitting had no effect. While messages were universally impactful across smoker subpopulations, everyday smokers and smokers with less trust in the government may be less receptive to communication campaigns.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27994002      PMCID: PMC5896547          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  21 in total

Review 1.  Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; James S Marks; Donna F Stroup; Julie L Gerberding
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Encouraging smokers to talk with their physicians about quitting.

Authors:  Tim McAfee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels: examining the impact of graphics, message framing, and temporal framing.

Authors:  Xiaoli Nan; Xiaoquan Zhao; Bo Yang; Irina Iles
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2014-03-14

4.  Mass media and school interventions for cigarette smoking prevention: effects 2 years after completion.

Authors:  B S Flynn; J K Worden; R H Secker-Walker; P L Pirie; G J Badger; J H Carpenter; B M Geller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Motivating goal-directed behavior through introspective self-talk: the role of the interrogative form of simple future tense.

Authors:  Ibrahim Senay; Dolores Albarracín; Kenji Noguchi
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-03-09

6.  Adolescent reactance and anti-smoking campaigns: a theoretical approach.

Authors:  Joseph Grandpre; Eusebio M Alvaro; Michael Burgoon; Claude H Miller; John R Hall
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2003

7.  Raising the Legal Age of Tobacco Sales: Policy Support and Trust in Government, 2014-2015, U.S.

Authors:  Joseph G L Lee; Marcella H Boynton; Amanda Richardson; Kristen Jarman; Leah M Ranney; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 8.  Enhancing the effectiveness of tobacco package warning labels: a social psychological perspective.

Authors:  E J Strahan; K White; G T Fong; L R Fabrigar; M P Zanna; R Cameron
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Impact on the Australian Quitline of new graphic cigarette pack warnings including the Quitline number.

Authors:  C L Miller; D J Hill; P G Quester; J E Hiller
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.

Authors:  Matthew J C Crump; John V McDonnell; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Do Smokers Recall Source or Quitline on Cigarette Constituent Messages?

Authors:  Kristen L Jarman; Sarah D Kowitt; Tara L Queen; Leah M Ranney; KyungSu Kim; Ellen E Jones; Emily Donovan; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-11

2.  An Eye Tracking Study of Anti-Smoking Messages on Toxic Chemicals in Cigarettes.

Authors:  Leah M Ranney; Sarah D Kowitt; Tara L Queen; Kristen L Jarman; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.