Literature DB >> 27993696

Long-Term Outcomes after Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix.

Patrick B Garvey1, Salvatore A Giordano1, Donald P Baumann1, Jun Liu1, Charles E Butler2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes data for hernia recurrence rates after abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term durability of AWR using ADM. STUDY
DESIGN: We studied patients who underwent AWR with ADM at a single center in 2005 to 2015 with a minimum follow-up of 36 months. Hernia recurrence was the primary end point and surgical site occurrence (SSO) was a secondary end point. The recurrence-free survival curves were estimated by Kaplan-Meier product limit method. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations of risk factors at surgery with subsequent risks for hernia recurrence and SSO, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 512 patients underwent AWR with ADM. After excluding those with follow-up less than 36 months, 191 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 52.9 months (range 36 to 104 months). Twenty-six of 191 patients had a hernia recurrence documented in the study. The cumulative recurrence rates were 11.5% at 3 years and 14.6% by 5 years. Factors significantly predictive of hernia recurrence developing included bridged repair, wound skin dehiscence, use of human cadaveric ADM, and coronary disease; component separation was protective. In a subset analysis excluding bridged repairs and human cadaveric ADM patients, cumulative hernia recurrence rates were 6.4% by 3 years and 8.3% by 5 years. The crude rate of SSO was 25.1% (48 of 191). Factors significantly predictive of the incidence of SSO included at least 1 comorbidity, BMI ≥30 kg/m2, and defect width >15 cm.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of ADM for AWR was associated with 11.5% and 14.6% hernia recurrence rates at 3- and 5-years follow-up, respectively. Avoiding bridged repairs and human cadaveric ADM can improve long-term AWR outcomes using ADM. Copyright Â
© 2016 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27993696     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  14 in total

1.  Outcomes using indocyanine green angiography with perforator-sparing component separation technique for abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Jenny M Shao; Yewande Alimi; Dylan Conroy; Parag Bhanot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  iBTA-induced bovine Biosheet for repair of abdominal wall defects in a beagle model: proof of concept.

Authors:  Y Nakayama; N Oshima; E Tatsumi; O Ichii; T Nishimura
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Decellularized materials derived from TSP2-KO mice promote enhanced neovascularization and integration in diabetic wounds.

Authors:  Aaron H Morris; Danielle K Stamer; Britta Kunkemoeller; Julie Chang; Hao Xing; Themis R Kyriakides
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Biologic Mesh in Surgery: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Selected Outcomes in 51 Studies and 6079 Patients.

Authors:  David J Samson; Mahir Gachabayov; Rifat Latifi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Systematic review of the stage of innovation of biological mesh for complex or contaminated abdominal wall closure.

Authors:  S K Kamarajah; S J Chapman; J Glasbey; D Morton; N Smart; T Pinkney; A Bhangu
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-06-14

6.  Application of Acellular Tissue Matrix for Enhancement of Weak Abdominal Wall in Animal Model.

Authors:  Minggang Wang; Shuo Yang; Zhen Cao; Sanyuan Hu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  In-vivo evaluation of a reinforced ovine biologic: a comparative study to available hernia mesh repair materials.

Authors:  N Overbeck; G M Nagvajara; S Ferzoco; B C H May; A Beierschmitt; S Qi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 8.  Clinical applications of acellular dermal matrices: A review.

Authors:  Kyla Petrie; Cameron T Cox; Benjamin C Becker; Brendan J MacKay
Journal:  Scars Burn Heal       Date:  2022-01-19

9.  Abdominal wall reconstruction following resection of large abdominal aggressive neoplasms using tensor fascia lata flap with or without mesh reinforcement.

Authors:  Z Song; D Yang; J Yang; X Nie; J Wu; H Song; Y Gu
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Fundamentals of Extracellular Matrix Biomaterial Assimilation: Effect of Suture Type on Attachment Strength and Cell Repopulation.

Authors:  David M Adelman; Kevin G Cornwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.