Emilie T McKinnon1, Jens H Jensen2, G Russell Glenn3, Joseph A Helpern4. 1. Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 2. Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. Electronic address: jense@musc.edu. 3. Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The dependence of the direction-averaged diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) signal in brain was studied as a function of b-value in order to help elucidate the relationship between diffusion weighting and brain microstructure. METHODS: High angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) data were acquired from two human volunteers with 128 diffusion-encoding directions and six b-value shells ranging from 1000 to 6000s/mm2 in increments of 1000s/mm2. The direction-averaged signal was calculated for each shell by averaging over all diffusion-encoding directions, and the signal was plotted as a function of b-value for selected regions of interest. As a supplementary analysis, similar methods were also applied to retrospective DWI data obtained from the human connectome project (HCP), which includes b-values up to 10,000s/mm2. RESULTS: For all regions of interest, a simple power law relationship accurately described the observed dependence of the direction-averaged signal as a function of the diffusion weighting. In white matter, the characteristic exponent was 0.56±0.05, while in gray matter it was 0.88±0.11. Comparable results were found with the HCP data. CONCLUSION: The direction-averaged DWI signal varies, to a good approximation, as a power of the b-value, for b-values between 1000 and 6000s/mm2. The exponents characterizing this power law behavior were markedly different for white and gray matter, indicative of sharply contrasting microstructural environments. These results may inform the construction of microstructural models used to interpret the DWI signal.
PURPOSE: The dependence of the direction-averaged diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) signal in brain was studied as a function of b-value in order to help elucidate the relationship between diffusion weighting and brain microstructure. METHODS: High angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) data were acquired from two human volunteers with 128 diffusion-encoding directions and six b-value shells ranging from 1000 to 6000s/mm2 in increments of 1000s/mm2. The direction-averaged signal was calculated for each shell by averaging over all diffusion-encoding directions, and the signal was plotted as a function of b-value for selected regions of interest. As a supplementary analysis, similar methods were also applied to retrospective DWI data obtained from the human connectome project (HCP), which includes b-values up to 10,000s/mm2. RESULTS: For all regions of interest, a simple power law relationship accurately described the observed dependence of the direction-averaged signal as a function of the diffusion weighting. In white matter, the characteristic exponent was 0.56±0.05, while in gray matter it was 0.88±0.11. Comparable results were found with the HCP data. CONCLUSION: The direction-averaged DWI signal varies, to a good approximation, as a power of the b-value, for b-values between 1000 and 6000s/mm2. The exponents characterizing this power law behavior were markedly different for white and gray matter, indicative of sharply contrasting microstructural environments. These results may inform the construction of microstructural models used to interpret the DWI signal.
Authors: R V Mulkern; H Gudbjartsson; C F Westin; H P Zengingonul; W Gartner; C R Guttmann; R L Robertson; W Kyriakos; R Schwartz; D Holtzman; F A Jolesz; S E Maier Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale Journal: Neuron Date: 2002-01-31 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Kevin M Bennett; Kathleen M Schmainda; Raoqiong Tong Bennett; Daniel B Rowe; Hanbing Lu; James S Hyde Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sune N Jespersen; Christopher D Kroenke; Leif Østergaard; Joseph J H Ackerman; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-12-22 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Olaf Dietrich; José G Raya; Scott B Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: K Setsompop; R Kimmlingen; E Eberlein; T Witzel; J Cohen-Adad; J A McNab; B Keil; M D Tisdall; P Hoecht; P Dietz; S F Cauley; V Tountcheva; V Matschl; V H Lenz; K Heberlein; A Potthast; H Thein; J Van Horn; A Toga; F Schmitt; D Lehne; B R Rosen; V Wedeen; L L Wald Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 6.556