Literature DB >> 27988835

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation in Taiwan.

Chieh-Yu Liu1,2, Hui-Chun Chen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prevention among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients by incorporating Taiwanese demographic information derived from a population-based database, the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), into cost-effectiveness analysis.
METHODS: From 1 January to 31 December 2012, 98,213 AF patients were selected from the NHIRD database. A Markov model was constructed that combined published secondary data with the Taiwan NHIRD to compare the cost and incremental cost effectiveness of apixaban 5 mg twice daily, dabigatran 110 or 150 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily, and warfarin.
RESULTS: The lifetime costs of warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg, and apixaban 5 mg were US$10,660, US$13,693, US$13,426, US$13,455, US$15,965, respectively. Apixaban resulted in an incremental cost effectiveness of US$39,351, US$27,039, US$41,298, and US$48,896 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) compared with warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, and rivaroxaban 20 mg, respectively. In Monte-Carlo analyses, apixaban 5 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg, warfarin, and dabigatran 110 mg were cost effective in 83, 10.4, 7, and 0.8%, respectively, of the simulations using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$50,000 per QALY.
CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban was more cost effective than warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in patients with AF. Among the anticoagulant therapies, the WTP threshold of apixaban was about US$50,000 per QALY gained. These cost-effectiveness estimations provide useful information to aid clinical decision making in stroke prevention for AF patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27988835     DOI: 10.1007/s40261-016-0487-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  35 in total

1.  Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Manesh R Patel; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Jyotsna Garg; Guohua Pan; Daniel E Singer; Werner Hacke; Günter Breithardt; Jonathan L Halperin; Graeme J Hankey; Jonathan P Piccini; Richard C Becker; Christopher C Nessel; John F Paolini; Scott D Berkowitz; Keith A A Fox; Robert M Califf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States.

Authors:  Patrick W Sullivan; William F Lawrence; Vahram Ghushchyan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  National Health Insurance In Taiwan.

Authors:  Ming-Jui Yeh; Heng-Hao Chang
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Stuart J Connolly; John Eikelboom; Campbell Joyner; Hans-Christoph Diener; Robert Hart; Sergey Golitsyn; Greg Flaker; Alvaro Avezum; Stefan H Hohnloser; Rafael Diaz; Mario Talajic; Jun Zhu; Prem Pais; Andrzej Budaj; Alexander Parkhomenko; Petr Jansky; Patrick Commerford; Ru San Tan; Kui-Hian Sim; Basil S Lewis; Walter Van Mieghem; Gregory Y H Lip; Jae Hyung Kim; Fernando Lanas-Zanetti; Antonio Gonzalez-Hermosillo; Antonio L Dans; Muhammad Munawar; Martin O'Donnell; John Lawrence; Gayle Lewis; Rizwan Afzal; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence and risk of stroke and all-cause death among Chinese.

Authors:  Kuo-Liong Chien; Ta-Chen Su; Hsiu-Ching Hsu; Wei-Tien Chang; Pei-Chung Chen; Ming-Fong Chen; Yuan-Teh Lee
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Stuart J Connolly; Michael D Ezekowitz; Salim Yusuf; John Eikelboom; Jonas Oldgren; Amit Parekh; Janice Pogue; Paul A Reilly; Ellison Themeles; Jeanne Varrone; Susan Wang; Marco Alings; Denis Xavier; Jun Zhu; Rafael Diaz; Basil S Lewis; Harald Darius; Hans-Christoph Diener; Campbell D Joyner; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Status of the epidemiology of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  William B Kannel; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.456

8.  The natural history of atrial fibrillation: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis in the Manitoba Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  A D Krahn; J Manfreda; R B Tate; F A Mathewson; T E Cuddy
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Comparison of cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation with dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation across countries.

Authors:  Martin Krejczy; Job Harenberg; Svetlana Marx; Konrad Obermann; Lutz Frölich; Martin Wehling
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  50 year trends in atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study.

Authors:  Renate B Schnabel; Xiaoyan Yin; Philimon Gona; Martin G Larson; Alexa S Beiser; David D McManus; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Steven A Lubitz; Jared W Magnani; Patrick T Ellinor; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Ramachandran S Vasan; Emelia J Benjamin; Daniel Levy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  6 in total

1.  Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kaisheng Deng; Jinqun Cheng; Shufang Rao; Huafu Xu; Lixia Li; Yanhui Gao
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-04-07

2.  Directly Acting Oral Anticoagulants for the Prevention of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation in England and Wales: Cost-Effectiveness Model and Value of Information Analysis.

Authors:  Howard H Z Thom; Will Hollingworth; Reecha Sofat; Zhenru Wang; Wei Fang; Pritesh N Bodalia; Peter A Bryden; Philippa A Davies; Deborah M Caldwell; Sofia Dias; Diane Eaton; Julian P T Higgins; Aroon D Hingorani; Jose A Lopez-Lopez; George N Okoli; Alison Richards; Chris Salisbury; Jelena Savović; Annya Stephens-Boal; Jonathan A C Sterne; Nicky J Welton
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2019-08-17

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin in the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation in China.

Authors:  Hongtao Wei; Can Cui; Xiangli Cui; Yi Liu; Dandan Li
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Direct Medical Cost of Stroke and the Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Siti Norain Azahar; Saperi Sulong; Wan Asyraf Wan Zaidi; Norliza Muhammad; Yusof Kamisah; Norliana Masbah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Economic evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rini Noviyani; Sitaporn Youngkong; Surakit Nathisuwan; Bhavani Shankara Bagepally; Usa Chaikledkaew; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Gareth McKay; Piyamitr Sritara; John Attia; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med       Date:  2021-10-11

6.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Oral Anticoagulants in Stroke Prevention among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chia-Te Liao; Mei-Chuan Lee; Zhih-Cherng Chen; Li-Jung Elizabeth Ku; Jung-Der Wang; Han Siong Toh
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.672

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.