BACKGROUND: Diet and obesity influence prostate cancer risk and progression-effects that may be mediated through the gut microbiome. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to explore relationships among diet, gut microbes, and Gleason sum in overweight and obese prostate cancer patients enrolled in a presurgical weight-loss trial. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (NCT01886677) secondary analysis. PARTICIPANTS/ SETTING:In 2013-2014, 40 prostate cancer patients in the southeastern United States were randomized and allocated equally to weight-loss and wait-list control arms while they awaited prostatectomy; stool samples were collected on a subset of 22 patients. INTERVENTION: Registered dietitian nutritionists and exercise physiologists provided semi-weekly in-person and telephone-based guidance on calorie-restricted diets and exercise to promote an approximate weight loss of 0.91 kg/wk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline and follow-up 24-hour dietary recalls were conducted and analyzed (using the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall system; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) for macronutrients, micronutrients, and food groups. Microbiome analysis targeting the V4 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene was performed on fecal samples. Biopsy Gleason sum data were accessed from diagnostic pathology reports. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Associations between dietary factors and operational taxonomic units were determined by β-diversity analysis. Wilcoxon signed rank, and Mann-Whitney U testing assessed within- and between-arm differences. Associations between Gleason sum and operational taxonomic units, and diet and operational taxonomic units, were analyzed using Spearman correlations. RESULTS: At baseline, Proteobacteria (median 0.06, interquartile range 0.01 to 0.16) were abundant, with four orders positively associated with Gleason sum. Gleason sum was associated with Clostridium (ρ=.579; P=0.005) and Blautia (ρ=-0.425, P=0.049). Increased red meat consumption from baseline was associated with Prevotella (ρ=-.497; P=0.018) and Blautia (ρ=.422; P=0.039). Men who increased poultry intake had decreased Clostridiales abundance (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: This hypothesis-generating study provides a starting point for investigating the relationships between the fecal microbiome, diet, and prostate cancer. Adequately powered studies are required to further explore and validate these findings.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Diet and obesity influence prostate cancer risk and progression-effects that may be mediated through the gut microbiome. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to explore relationships among diet, gut microbes, and Gleason sum in overweight and obese prostate cancerpatients enrolled in a presurgical weight-loss trial. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (NCT01886677) secondary analysis. PARTICIPANTS/ SETTING: In 2013-2014, 40 prostate cancerpatients in the southeastern United States were randomized and allocated equally to weight-loss and wait-list control arms while they awaited prostatectomy; stool samples were collected on a subset of 22 patients. INTERVENTION: Registered dietitian nutritionists and exercise physiologists provided semi-weekly in-person and telephone-based guidance on calorie-restricted diets and exercise to promote an approximate weight loss of 0.91 kg/wk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline and follow-up 24-hour dietary recalls were conducted and analyzed (using the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall system; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) for macronutrients, micronutrients, and food groups. Microbiome analysis targeting the V4 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene was performed on fecal samples. Biopsy Gleason sum data were accessed from diagnostic pathology reports. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Associations between dietary factors and operational taxonomic units were determined by β-diversity analysis. Wilcoxon signed rank, and Mann-Whitney U testing assessed within- and between-arm differences. Associations between Gleason sum and operational taxonomic units, and diet and operational taxonomic units, were analyzed using Spearman correlations. RESULTS: At baseline, Proteobacteria (median 0.06, interquartile range 0.01 to 0.16) were abundant, with four orders positively associated with Gleason sum. Gleason sum was associated with Clostridium (ρ=.579; P=0.005) and Blautia (ρ=-0.425, P=0.049). Increased red meat consumption from baseline was associated with Prevotella (ρ=-.497; P=0.018) and Blautia (ρ=.422; P=0.039). Men who increased poultry intake had decreased Clostridiales abundance (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: This hypothesis-generating study provides a starting point for investigating the relationships between the fecal microbiome, diet, and prostate cancer. Adequately powered studies are required to further explore and validate these findings.
Authors: T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: K S Smith; A D Frugé; W van der Pol; N E Caston; C D Morrow; W Demark-Wahnefried; T L Carson Journal: Benef Microbes Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 4.205
Authors: Matthew Dixon; Maria Stefil; Michael McDonald; Truls Erik Bjerklund-Johansen; Kurt Naber; Florian Wagenlehner; Vladimir Mouraviev Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Susanne M Henning; Colette Galet; Kiran Gollapudi; Joshua B Byrd; Pei Liang; Zhaoping Li; Tristan Grogan; David Elashoff; Clara E Magyar; Jonathan Said; Pinchas Cohen; William J Aronson Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: W Demark-Wahnefried; S Rais-Bahrami; R A Desmond; J B Gordetsky; M Azrad; A D Frugé; E S Yang; L A Norian; W E Grizzle Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Robert U Newton; Claus T Christophersen; Ciaran M Fairman; Nicolas H Hart; Dennis R Taaffe; David Broadhurst; Amanda Devine; Raphael Chee; Colin I Tang; Nigel Spry; Daniel A Galvão Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-04-14 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Andrew D Frugé; Kristen S Smith; Aaron J Riviere; Rachel Tenpenny-Chigas; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Anna E Arthur; William M Murrah; William J van der Pol; Shanese L Jasper; Casey D Morrow; Robert D Arnold; Kimberly Braxton-Lloyd Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Xingyu Xiong; Hang Xu; Sheng Wang; Xinyang Liao; Xianyanling Yi; Kun Jin; Haoran Lei; Shengjiang Bai; Shi Qiu; Lu Yang Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-01-24
Authors: Olga Golubnitschaja; Peter Kubatka; Alena Mazurakova; Marek Samec; Abdullah Alajati; Frank A Giordano; Vincenzo Costigliola; Jörg Ellinger; Manuel Ritter Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Andrew D Frugé; Kristen S Smith; Jennifer R Bail; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 6.244