Literature DB >> 33789551

Gut microbial differences in breast and prostate cancer cases from two randomised controlled trials compared to matched cancer-free controls.

K S Smith1, A D Frugé1, W van der Pol2, N E Caston3, C D Morrow4, W Demark-Wahnefried5, T L Carson6.   

Abstract

Implicated in several chronic diseases, the gastrointestinal microbiome is hypothesised to influence carcinogenesis. We compared faecal microbiota of newly diagnosed treatment-naïve overweight and obese cancer patients and matched controls. Cases were enrolled in presurgical weight-loss trials for breast (NCT02224807) and prostate (NCT01886677) cancers and had a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2. Cancer-free controls were matched 1:1 by age (±5 years), race, gender, and BMI (±5 kg/m2). All participants provided faecal samples; isolated bacterial DNA were PCR amplified at the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and analysed using the QIIME pipeline. Tests compared cases versus controls, then separately by gender. Microbial alpha-diversity and beta-diversity were assessed, and relative abundance of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTU's) were compared at the genus level, with false discovery rate (FDR) correction. 22 overweight and obese cancer patients were matched with 22 cancer-free controls, with an average BMI of 30.5±4.3 kg/m2, age 54.4±5.3 years, and 54.5% were black. Fourteen matches were made between breast cancer cases and healthy female controls, and 8 matches were made with prostate cancer cases and healthy male controls. Comparison of all cases and controls revealed no differences in alpha diversity, though prostate cancer patients had higher Chao1 (P=0.006) and Observed Species (P=0.036) than cancer-free males. Beta-diversity metrics were significantly different between cases and controls (P<0.03 for all tests in whole sample and in men), though only unweighted Unifrac was different in women (P=0.005). Kruskal Wallis tests indicated significant differences among 16 genera in all matches, 9 in female, and 51 in male. This study suggests the faecal microbiota of treatment-naive breast and prostate cancer patients differs from controls, though larger samples are needed to substantiate these findings. Trial registration: NIH Clinical Trials, NCT01886677, NCT02224807, registered 26 June 2013, 25 Aug 2014 (respectively) - retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01886677; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02224807.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beta-diversity; case-control; gut microbiota; oncology

Year:  2021        PMID: 33789551      PMCID: PMC8328038          DOI: 10.3920/BM2020.0098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Benef Microbes        ISSN: 1876-2883            Impact factor:   4.205


  53 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Investigation of the association between the fecal microbiota and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a population-based case-control pilot study.

Authors:  James J Goedert; Gieira Jones; Xing Hua; Xia Xu; Guoqin Yu; Roberto Flores; Roni T Falk; Mitchell H Gail; Jianxin Shi; Jacques Ravel; Heather Spencer Feigelson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health.

Authors:  Harry J Flint; Karen P Scott; Petra Louis; Sylvia H Duncan
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Petra Louis; Georgina L Hold; Harry J Flint
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Endogenous estrogen, androgen, and progesterone concentrations and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Stacey A Missmer; A Heather Eliassen; Robert L Barbieri; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Hydrogen sulfide induces direct radical-associated DNA damage.

Authors:  Matias S Attene-Ramos; Elizabeth D Wagner; H Rex Gaskins; Michael J Plewa
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 5.852

7.  Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance.

Authors:  Patrice D Cani; Jacques Amar; Miguel Angel Iglesias; Marjorie Poggi; Claude Knauf; Delphine Bastelica; Audrey M Neyrinck; Francesca Fava; Kieran M Tuohy; Chantal Chabo; Aurélie Waget; Evelyne Delmée; Béatrice Cousin; Thierry Sulpice; Bernard Chamontin; Jean Ferrières; Jean-François Tanti; Glenn R Gibson; Louis Casteilla; Nathalie M Delzenne; Marie Christine Alessi; Rémy Burcelin
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 9.461

8.  The Role of Gut Microbiome in the Pathogenesis of Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, Pilot Study.

Authors:  David M Golombos; Abimbola Ayangbesan; Padraic O'Malley; Patrick Lewicki; LaMont Barlow; Christopher E Barbieri; Chrystal Chan; Casey DuLong; Galeb Abu-Ali; Curtis Huttenhower; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Sex, body mass index, and dietary fiber intake influence the human gut microbiome.

Authors:  Christine Dominianni; Rashmi Sinha; James J Goedert; Zhiheng Pei; Liying Yang; Richard B Hayes; Jiyoung Ahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Breast Cancer and Its Relationship with the Microbiota.

Authors:  Mariana F Fernández; Iris Reina-Pérez; Juan Manuel Astorga; Andrea Rodríguez-Carrillo; Julio Plaza-Díaz; Luis Fontana
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  1 in total

1.  Specific Gut Microbial Environment in Lard Diet-Induced Prostate Cancer Development and Progression.

Authors:  Hiromi Sato; Shintaro Narita; Masanori Ishida; Yoshiko Takahashi; Huang Mingguo; Soki Kashima; Ryohei Yamamoto; Atsushi Koizumi; Taketoshi Nara; Kazuyuki Numakura; Mitsuru Saito; Toshiaki Yoshioka; Tomonori Habuchi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.