Dongni Ye1, Mitchel Klein, Howard H Chang, Jeremy A Sarnat, James A Mulholland, Eric S Edgerton, Andrea Winquist, Paige E Tolbert, Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat. 1. From the aDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; bDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; cDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; dSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA; and eAtmospheric Research & Analysis, Inc., Cary, NC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The health effects of ambient volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have received less attention in epidemiologic studies than other commonly measured ambient pollutants. In this study, we estimated acute cardiorespiratory effects of ambient VOCs in an urban population. METHODS: Daily concentrations of 89 VOCs were measured at a centrally-located ambient monitoring site in Atlanta and daily counts of emergency department visits for cardiovascular diseases and asthma in the five-county Atlanta area were obtained for the 1998-2008 period. To understand the health effects of the large number of species, we grouped these VOCs a priori by chemical structure and estimated the associations between VOC groups and daily counts of emergency department visits in a time-series framework using Poisson regression. We applied three analytic approaches to estimate the VOC group effects: an indicator pollutant approach, a joint effect analysis, and a random effect meta-analysis, each with different assumptions. We performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate copollutant confounding. RESULTS: Hydrocarbon groups, particularly alkenes and alkynes, were associated with emergency department visits for cardiovascular diseases, while the ketone group was associated with emergency department visits for asthma. CONCLUSIONS: The associations observed between emergency department visits for cardiovascular diseases and alkenes and alkynes may reflect the role of traffic exhaust, while the association between asthma visits and ketones may reflect the role of secondary organic compounds. The different patterns of associations we observed for cardiovascular diseases and asthma suggest different modes of action of these pollutants or the mixtures they represent.
BACKGROUND: The health effects of ambient volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have received less attention in epidemiologic studies than other commonly measured ambient pollutants. In this study, we estimated acute cardiorespiratory effects of ambient VOCs in an urban population. METHODS: Daily concentrations of 89 VOCs were measured at a centrally-located ambient monitoring site in Atlanta and daily counts of emergency department visits for cardiovascular diseases and asthma in the five-county Atlanta area were obtained for the 1998-2008 period. To understand the health effects of the large number of species, we grouped these VOCs a priori by chemical structure and estimated the associations between VOC groups and daily counts of emergency department visits in a time-series framework using Poisson regression. We applied three analytic approaches to estimate the VOC group effects: an indicator pollutant approach, a joint effect analysis, and a random effect meta-analysis, each with different assumptions. We performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate copollutant confounding. RESULTS:Hydrocarbon groups, particularly alkenes and alkynes, were associated with emergency department visits for cardiovascular diseases, while the ketone group was associated with emergency department visits for asthma. CONCLUSIONS: The associations observed between emergency department visits for cardiovascular diseases and alkenes and alkynes may reflect the role of traffic exhaust, while the association between asthma visits and ketones may reflect the role of secondary organic compounds. The different patterns of associations we observed for cardiovascular diseases and asthma suggest different modes of action of these pollutants or the mixtures they represent.
Authors: Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat; Andrea Winquist; James J Schauer; Jay R Turner; Jeremy A Sarnat Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Audrey Flak Pennington; Matthew J Strickland; Katherine Gass; Mitchel Klein; Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat; Paige E Tolbert; Sivaraman Balachandran; Howard H Chang; Armistead G Russell; James A Mulholland; Lyndsey A Darrow Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Haiyan Tong; Jonathan D Krug; Q Todd Krantz; Charly King; Marie M Hargrove; M Ian Gilmour; Stephen H Gavett Journal: Cardiovasc Toxicol Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.231
Authors: Brian J Reich; Yawen Guan; Denis Fourches; Joshua L Warren; Stefanie E Sarnat; Howard H Chang Journal: Ann Appl Stat Date: 2020-12-19 Impact factor: 2.083
Authors: Eugene A Gibbs-Flournoy; M Ian Gilmour; Mark Higuchi; James Jetter; Ingrid George; Lisa Copeland; Randy Harrison; Virginia C Moser; Janice A Dye Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Jenna R Krall; Howard H Chang; Lance A Waller; James A Mulholland; Andrea Winquist; Evelyn O Talbott; Judith R Rager; Paige E Tolbert; Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-08-11 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Joseph Y Abrams; Rodney J Weber; Mitchel Klein; Stefanie E Sarnat; Howard H Chang; Matthew J Strickland; Vishal Verma; Ting Fang; Josephine T Bates; James A Mulholland; Armistead G Russell; Paige E Tolbert Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 9.031