GOALS: To evaluate our experience with stool donor recruitment, screening, retention, and donor perception for fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). BACKGROUND: Multiply recurrent Clostridium difficile infection is being increasingly managed with FMT from donor stools. However, donor selection and recruitment is challenging due to lack of standard evidence-based guidelines, donor exclusion criteria, frequency of screening and donor commitment. METHODS: Data on donors screened using institutional guidelines with history, blood and stool testing and their perspectives on donation were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall 42 potential donors (21 known and 21 standard) were prescreened. Of known donors (median age 34 y, 66.6% female), none failed prescreening, blood or stool tests. Twelve standard donors (57%) failed prescreening based on history (depression, diarrhea, autoimmune disease, recent antibiotic exposure, colon polyps, pregnancy). Nine (median age 35 y, 44.4% female) passed blood and stool testing. On repeat screening, 3 were excluded (2-positive stool shiga toxin (asymptomatic), 1-pregnancy). One donor opted out and 5 became long-term donors; 3 have donated >50 times and 2 have donated >25 times. On the basis of donor perception questionnaire, most standard donors were aware of FMT for C. difficile infection as a treatment option and would not consider 3-monthly blood and stool testing inconvenient. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of healthy individuals who volunteered to become a standard donor failed prescreening and were not subjected to blood and stool testing. Repeat testing for asymptomatic donors may be a barrier to donor retention. Universal guidelines are needed to develop strategies to facilitate donor screening.
GOALS: To evaluate our experience with stool donor recruitment, screening, retention, and donor perception for fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). BACKGROUND: Multiply recurrent Clostridium difficile infection is being increasingly managed with FMT from donor stools. However, donor selection and recruitment is challenging due to lack of standard evidence-based guidelines, donor exclusion criteria, frequency of screening and donor commitment. METHODS: Data on donors screened using institutional guidelines with history, blood and stool testing and their perspectives on donation were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall 42 potential donors (21 known and 21 standard) were prescreened. Of known donors (median age 34 y, 66.6% female), none failed prescreening, blood or stool tests. Twelve standard donors (57%) failed prescreening based on history (depression, diarrhea, autoimmune disease, recent antibiotic exposure, colon polyps, pregnancy). Nine (median age 35 y, 44.4% female) passed blood and stool testing. On repeat screening, 3 were excluded (2-positive stool shiga toxin (asymptomatic), 1-pregnancy). One donor opted out and 5 became long-term donors; 3 have donated >50 times and 2 have donated >25 times. On the basis of donor perception questionnaire, most standard donors were aware of FMT for C. difficile infection as a treatment option and would not consider 3-monthly blood and stool testing inconvenient. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of healthy individuals who volunteered to become a standard donor failed prescreening and were not subjected to blood and stool testing. Repeat testing for asymptomatic donors may be a barrier to donor retention. Universal guidelines are needed to develop strategies to facilitate donor screening.
Authors: Mèlanie V Bénard; Clara M A de Bruijn; Aline C Fenneman; Koen Wortelboer; Judith Zeevenhoven; Bente Rethans; Hilde J Herrema; Tom van Gool; Max Nieuwdorp; Marc A Benninga; Cyriel Y Ponsioen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-10-20 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Laura J Craven; Seema Nair Parvathy; Justin Tat-Ko; Jeremy P Burton; Michael S Silverman Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Sahil Khanna; Yoshiki Vazquez-Baeza; Antonio González; Sophie Weiss; Bradley Schmidt; David A Muñiz-Pedrogo; John F Rainey; Patricia Kammer; Heidi Nelson; Michael Sadowsky; Alexander Khoruts; Stefan L Farrugia; Rob Knight; Darrell S Pardi; Purna C Kashyap Journal: Microbiome Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: L A Draper; F J Ryan; M K Smith; J Jalanka; E Mattila; P A Arkkila; R P Ross; R Satokari; C Hill Journal: Microbiome Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Breanna McSweeney; Jessica R Allegretti; Monika Fischer; Huiping Xu; Karen J Goodman; Tanya Monaghan; Carmen McLeod; Benjamin H Mullish; Elaine O Petrof; Emmalee L Phelps; Roxana Chis; Abby Edmison; Angela Juby; Ralph Ennis-Davis; Brandi Roach; Karen Wong; Dina Kao Journal: Gut Microbes Date: 2019-05-23
Authors: Raseen Tariq; Renee M Weatherly; Patricia P Kammer; Darrell S Pardi; Sahil Khanna Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Date: 2017-05-19