Literature DB >> 27982707

Feasibility of Long-Term Closed-Loop Control: A Multicenter 6-Month Trial of 24/7 Automated Insulin Delivery.

Boris Kovatchev1, Peiyao Cheng2, Stacey M Anderson1, Jordan E Pinsker3, Federico Boscari4, Bruce A Buckingham5, Francis J Doyle6,7, Korey K Hood5, Sue A Brown1, Marc D Breton1, Daniel Chernavvsky1, Wendy C Bevier3, Paige K Bradley3, Daniela Bruttomesso4, Simone Del Favero4, Roberta Calore4, Claudio Cobelli4, Angelo Avogaro4, Trang T Ly5, Satya Shanmugham5, Eyal Dassau6,7, Craig Kollman2, John W Lum2, Roy W Beck2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the past few years, the artificial pancreas-the commonly accepted term for closed-loop control (CLC) of blood glucose in diabetes-has become a hot topic in research and technology development. In the summer of 2014, we initiated a 6-month trial evaluating the safety of 24/7 CLC during free-living conditions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Following an initial 1-month Phase 1, 14 individuals (10 males/4 females) with type 1 diabetes at three clinical centers in the United States and one in Italy continued with a 5-month Phase 2, which included 24/7 CLC using the wireless portable Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) developed at the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology. Median subject characteristics were age 45 years, duration of diabetes 27 years, total daily insulin 0.53 U/kg/day, and baseline HbA1c 7.2% (55 mmol/mol).
RESULTS: Compared with the baseline observation period, the frequency of hypoglycemia below 3.9 mmol/L during the last 3 months of CLC was lower: 4.1% versus 1.3%, P < 0.001. This was accompanied by a downward trend in HbA1c from 7.2% (55 mmol/mol) to 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at 6 months. HbA1c improvement was correlated with system use (Spearman r = 0.55). The user experience was favorable with identified benefit particularly at night and overall trust in the system. There were no serious adverse events, severe hypoglycemia, or diabetic ketoacidosis.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that CLC technology has matured and is safe for prolonged use in patients' natural environment. Based on these promising results, a large randomized trial is warranted to assess long-term CLC efficacy and safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial pancreas.; Automated insulin delivery (AID); Closed-loop control; Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); Insulin pump therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27982707     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2016.0333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  49 in total

1.  Evaluation of an Artificial Pancreas with Enhanced Model Predictive Control and a Glucose Prediction Trust Index with Unannounced Exercise.

Authors:  Jordan E Pinsker; Alejandro J Laguna Sanz; Joon Bok Lee; Mei Mei Church; Camille Andre; Laura E Lindsey; Francis J Doyle; Eyal Dassau
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Fully Closed-Loop Multiple Model Probabilistic Predictive Controller Artificial Pancreas Performance in Adolescents and Adults in a Supervised Hotel Setting.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Faye M Cameron; Trang T Ly; David Lam; Daniel P Howsmon; Nihat Baysal; Georgia Kulina; Laurel Messer; Paula Clinton; Camilla Levister; Stephen D Patek; Carol J Levy; R Paul Wadwa; David M Maahs; B Wayne Bequette; Bruce A Buckingham
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Insulin Infusion Sets and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: Where the Artificial Pancreas Meets the Patient.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Multivariable Artificial Pancreas for Various Exercise Types and Intensities.

Authors:  Kamuran Turksoy; Iman Hajizadeh; Nicole Hobbs; Jennifer Kilkus; Elizabeth Littlejohn; Sediqeh Samadi; Jianyuan Feng; Mert Sevil; Caterina Lazaro; Julia Ritthaler; Brooks Hibner; Nancy Devine; Laurie Quinn; Ali Cinar
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Effect of Afrezza on Glucose Dynamics During HCL Treatment.

Authors:  Alfonso Galderisi; Nathan Cohen; Peter Calhoun; Kristen Kraemer; Marc Breton; Stuart Weinzimer; Eda Cengiz
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  First Experiences With a Wearable Multisensor Device in a Noninvasive Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study at Home, Part II: The Investigators' View.

Authors:  Mattia Zanon; Martin Mueller; Pavel Zakharov; Mark S Talary; Marc Donath; Werner A Stahel; Andreas Caduff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-11-16

7.  A qualitative study exploring the expectations of people living with type 1 diabetes regarding prospective use of a hybrid closed-loop system.

Authors:  A Quintal; V Messier; R Rabasa-Lhoret; E Racine
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  The International Diabetes Closed-Loop Study: Testing Artificial Pancreas Component Interoperability.

Authors:  Stacey M Anderson; Eyal Dassau; Dan Raghinaru; John Lum; Sue A Brown; Jordan E Pinsker; Mei Mei Church; Carol Levy; David Lam; Yogish C Kudva; Bruce Buckingham; Gregory P Forlenza; R Paul Wadwa; Lori Laffel; Francis J Doyle; J Hans DeVries; Eric Renard; Claudio Cobelli; Federico Boscari; Simone Del Favero; Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Evening and overnight closed-loop control versus 24/7 continuous closed-loop control for type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Laura Kollar; Stacey M Anderson; Charlotte Barnett; Marc D Breton; Kelly Carr; Rachel Gildersleeve; Mary C Oliveri; Christian A Wakeman; Sue A Brown
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-01-03

Review 10.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring Integration in Clinical Practice: A Stepped Guide to Data Review and Interpretation.

Authors:  Grazia Aleppo; Kimberly Webb
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.