Literature DB >> 27982496

Forensic mental health clinician's experiences with and assessment of alliance regarding the patient's readiness to be released from mechanical restraint.

Lea Deichmann Nielsen1,2,3,4, Frederik Alkier Gildberg1,4, Per Bech5, Jane Lange Dalgaard2, Gitte Munksgaard1,4, Lise Hounsgaard3,4,6,7.   

Abstract

One of the main reasons for prolonged duration of mechanical restraint is patient behaviour in relation to the clinician-patient alliance. This article reports on the forensic mental health clinicians experiences of the clinician-patient alliance during mechanical restraint, and their assessment of parameters of alliance regarding the patient's readiness to be released from restraint. We used a qualitative, descriptive approach and conducted focus group interviews with nurses, nurse assistants and social and healthcare assistants. The results show that a pre-established personal clinician-patient alliance formed the basis for entering into, and weighing the quality of, the alliance during mechanical restraint. In consideration of the patient's psychiatric condition, the clinicians observed and assessed two quality parameters for the alliance: 'the patient's insight into or understanding of present situation' (e.g. the reasons for mechanical restraint and the behaviour required of the patient to discontinue restraint) and 'the patient's ability to have good and stable contact and cooperation with and across clinicians. These assessments were included, as a total picture of the quality of the alliance with the patient', in the overall team assessment of the patient's readiness to be released from mechanical restraint. The results contribute to inform the development of a short-term risk assessment instrument, with the aim of reducing the duration of mechanical restraint.
© 2016 Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  forensic psychiatry; physical restraint; professional-patient relations; risk assessment; risk management

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27982496     DOI: 10.1111/inm.12300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1445-8330            Impact factor:   3.503


  2 in total

1.  Patient safety in inpatient mental health settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bethan Thibaut; Lindsay Helen Dewa; Sonny Christian Ramtale; Danielle D'Lima; Sheila Adam; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Stephanie Archer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Mental health professionals' perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Nafiso Ahmed; Sally Barlow; Lisa Reynolds; Nicholas Drey; Fareha Begum; Elizabeth Tuudah; Alan Simpson
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.630

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.