INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive techniques are used more and more frequently. Since conventional laparoscopic approach has been the gold standard, surgeons in their effort to further reduce the invasiveness of conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy have adopted Single Incision approach. The widespread adoption of robotics has led to the inevitable hybridization of robotic technology with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). As a result, employment of the da Vinci surgical system may allow greater surgical maneuverability, improving ergonomics. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A review of the English literature was conducted to evaluate all robotic single port cholecystectomy performed till today. Demographic data, operative parameters, postoperative outcomes and materials used for the operation were collected and assessed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 12 studies, including 501 patients were analyzed. Demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients was heterogeneous, but in most studies a mean BMI <30 was recorded. Intraoperative metrics like operative time, estimated blood loss and conversion rate were comparable with those in multiport conventional laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic single port cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible alternative to conventional multiport laparoscopic or manual robotic approach. However, current data do not suggest a superiority of robotic SILC over other established methods.
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive techniques are used more and more frequently. Since conventional laparoscopic approach has been the gold standard, surgeons in their effort to further reduce the invasiveness of conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy have adopted Single Incision approach. The widespread adoption of robotics has led to the inevitable hybridization of robotic technology with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). As a result, employment of the da Vinci surgical system may allow greater surgical maneuverability, improving ergonomics. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A review of the English literature was conducted to evaluate all robotic single port cholecystectomy performed till today. Demographic data, operative parameters, postoperative outcomes and materials used for the operation were collected and assessed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 12 studies, including 501 patients were analyzed. Demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients was heterogeneous, but in most studies a mean BMI <30 was recorded. Intraoperative metrics like operative time, estimated blood loss and conversion rate were comparable with those in multiport conventional laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic single port cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible alternative to conventional multiport laparoscopic or manual robotic approach. However, current data do not suggest a superiority of robotic SILC over other established methods.
Authors: Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Shannon Melissa Chan; Hon Chi Yip; Vivien Wai Yin Wong; Philip Wai Yan Chiu; Enders Kwok Wai Ng Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Marinos C Makris; Panos G Athanasopoulos; Michael Kornaropoulos; Periclis Chrysocheris; Fotios Antonakopoulos; Antonia Mathioulaki; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Argyrios Ioannidis; Michael K Konstantinidis; Demetrios Moris; Konstantinos M Konstantinidis Journal: Mol Clin Oncol Date: 2019-10-03