| Literature DB >> 27981118 |
Wen Liu1, Lauren Schaffer1, Natalie Herrs1, Christine Chollet1, Sarah Taylor2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Sleep disorder and fatigue are among a few major concerns of breast cancer survivors across the survivorship trajectory. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine feasibility and trends in multiple outcomes after a 6-week Qigong exercise program in breast cancer survivors.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Qigong; fatigue; sleep disorder; survivors
Year: 2015 PMID: 27981118 PMCID: PMC5123500 DOI: 10.4103/2347-5625.170537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs ISSN: 2347-5625
Study participants’ background information and clinical characteristics
| Subject # | Ethnicity/race | Age | Education (year) | Marital status | Employment | Cancer stage | Cancer treatment | Post-treatment | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | BMI | IIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | W/nonH | 70.6 | 15 | Married | Retired | 1 | s/r | 105 | 167.6 | 70.4 | 25.0 | 12 |
| 3 | W/nonH | 48.7 | 15 | Married | Unemployed | 2 | s/c | 17 | 162.6 | 77.2 | 29.2 | 17 |
| 4 | W/nonH | 67.1 | 13 | Married | Self-employed | 3 | s/r/c | 8 | 157.5 | 65.8 | 26.5 | 16 |
| 5 | W/nonH | 48.1 | 15 | Married | Full-time | 2 | s/r/c | 22 | 170.2 | 86.3 | 29.8 | 17 |
| 7 | W/nonH | 55.1 | 18 | Single | Full-time | 1 | s/r | 195 | 171.5 | 103.5 | 35.2 | 15 |
| 8 | W/nonH | 50.2 | 15 | Married | Part-time | 2 | s/r/c | 8 | 157.5 | 59.0 | 23.8 | 13 |
| 9 | W/nonH | 58.8 | 15 | Married | Part-time | 1 | s/r/c | 6.5 | 167.6 | 68.1 | 24.2 | 12 |
| 10 | B | 44.6 | 18 | Single | Full-time | 2 | s/r/c | 10 | 167.6 | 69.5 | 24.7 | 16 |
| Mean | 55.4 | 15.5 | 46.4 | 165.3 | 75.0 | 27.3 | 14.8 |
W/nonH: White or Caucasian, not Hispanic, B: Black or Africa American, s/r: Surgery and radiotherapy, s/c: Surgery and chemotherapy, s/r/c: Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, BMI: Body mass index, IIS: Insomnia Index score
Figure 1Group means (standard deviation) between baseline and end-study measurements were significantly different in (a) Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total score (P < 0.01); and (b) insomnia index score (P < 0.01)
Mean score (SD) of the group for each specific item in PSQI pre (baseline) and post the intervention. For each item, the score ranged from 0 to 3, representing no problem to severe problem
| PSQI item | Pre | Post | Percentage of change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep duration | 1.50 (0.39) | 1.13 (0.83) | 25.0 | 0.099 |
| Sleep disturbances | 1.75 (0.46) | 1.38 (0.52) | 21.4 | 0.040 |
| Sleep latency | 1.00 (0.93) | 0.25 (0.46) | 75.0 | 0.024 |
| Daytime dysfunction | 1.75 (0.89) | 0.63 (0.74) | 64.3 | 0.007 |
| Sleep efficiency | 1.38 (1.30) | 0.63 (0.92) | 54.5 | 0.024 |
| Sleep quality | 2.00 (0.76) | 0.63 (0.92) | 68.8 | 0.000 |
| Use of sleep medicine | 1.00 (1.41) | 0.75 (1.16) | 25.0 | 0.175 |
SD: Standard deviation, PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Figure 2Group means (standard deviation) between baseline and end-study measurements were significantly different in (a) Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 score (P < 0.01); and (b) short-form 36 score (P < 0.01)
Mean score (SD) of the group for each specific subcategory in SF-36 pre (baseline) and post the intervention. For each item, the score ranged from 0 to 100, representing the worst to best
| SF-36 subcategory | Pre | Post | Percentage of change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical functioning | 77.5 (11.6) | 84.4 (8.6) | 8.9 | 0.014 |
| Role limitations due to physical health | 59.4 (26.5) | 100.0 (0.0) | 68.4 | 0.002 |
| Role limitations due to emotional problems | 58.3 (38.8) | 91.7 (15.4) | 57.1 | 0.009 |
| Energy/fatigue | 44.4 (12.7) | 63.1 (11.3) | 42.3 | 0.014 |
| Emotional wellbeing | 71.0 (14.0) | 75.0 (12.6) | 5.6 | 0.279 |
| Social functioning | 70.3 (17.6) | 85.9 (23.6) | 22.2 | 0.070 |
| Bodily pain | 73.1 (19.8) | 77.5 (18.2) | 6.0 | 0.237 |
| General health | 63.1 (18.3) | 72.5 (16.3) | 14.9 | 0.009 |
SD: Standard deviation, SF-36: Short-form 36