| Literature DB >> 27980899 |
Joseph J Richardson1, James W Maina1, Hirotaka Ejima1, Ming Hu1, Junling Guo1, Mei Y Choy2, Sylvia T Gunawan1, Lien Lybaert3, Christoph E Hagemeyer2, Bruno G De Geest3, Frank Caruso1.
Abstract
Polymer microcapsules are of particular interest for applications including self-healing coatings, catalysis, bioreactions, sensing, and drug delivery. The primary way that polymer capsules can exhibit functionality relevant to these diverse fields is through the incorporation of functional cargo in the capsule cavity or wall. Diverse functional and therapeutic cargo can be loaded into polymer capsules with ease using polymer-stabilized calcium carbonate (CaCO3) particles. A variety of examples are demonstrated, including 15 types of cargo, yielding a toolbox with effectively 500+ variations. This process uses no harsh reagents and can take less than 30 min to prepare, load, coat, and form the hollow capsules. For these reasons, it is expected that the technique will play a crucial role across scientific studies in numerous fields.Entities:
Keywords: drug delivery; drug loading; inorganic templates; nanomedicine; polymer capsules
Year: 2015 PMID: 27980899 PMCID: PMC5115278 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201400007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Scheme 1Scheme of the capsule assembly process. Polymer‐stabilized calcium carbonate particles are loaded with diverse cargo, ranging from biomolecules to inorganic particles and then capped with a polymer such as a polypeptide or a supramolecular polymer. After capping, the calcium carbonate core can be removed, yielding highly loaded functional capsules. A detailed table of the cargo, stabilizing polymers, and capping polymers examined in this study can be found in Table S1, Supporting Information.
Figure 1Microscopy images corresponding to capsules loaded with various types of cargo prepared from a–d) and f–o) PSS/PAH and e) PSS/HIS. The fluorescence microscopy images correspond to autofluorescence for e) DOX, j) iron oxide, k) nanodiamonds, and l) gold, and to fluorescent labels for f) fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)‐dextran, g) liposomes (FITC‐labeled lipid), h) ovalbumin (FITC), and i) DNA (Alexa Fluor 647‐labeled DNA and FITC‐labeled PAH). m) TEM image of PSS/PAH capsules partially loaded with Prussian Blue cubes. n) PSS/PAH capsule loaded with Prussian Blue cages (inset) with a differential interference contrast (DIC) image of the capsules. o) EDX mapping of a PSS/PAH capsule loaded with Prussian Blue cages (purple corresponds to sulfur from PSS and green corresponds to iron from Prussian Blue cages). The scale bars are a–l) 5 μm and m–o) 1 μm.
Figure 2MTT assay cell toxicity results for 500 and 900 nm DOX‐loaded particles and DOX loaded ARG‐capped capsules at different time points for a) 20 ng of DOX per well and c) 200 ng of DOX per well. U – Uncapped DOX–PSS particles (CaCO3 removed) and C – capped DOX‐loaded PSS/ARG capsules. Corresponding fluorescence microscopy images of the cells incubated for 6 h with 900 nm; b) uncapped DOX–PSS particles and d) capped DOX‐loaded PSS/ARG capsules (equivalent concentration of 20 ng DOX per well). The cell viability of untreated cells was normalized to 100%. The red corresponds to DOX, the blue corresponds to nuclear staining (Hoechst), and the green corresponds to cell membrane staining (phalloidin‐Alexa Fluor 647). The scale bars are 10 μm.
Figure 3Nonloaded capsules formed with different capping polymers. The fluorescence corresponds to FITC labeling for a) PAH and b) PLL, and to Alexa Fluor 488 labeling for c) and d) PDPA. Both pH‐responsive polymers c) and d) PDPA and g) and h) HIS showed pH‐dependent shrinking (above the pK a) and swelling (below the pK a) and became more transparent when hydrated (i.e., below the pK a). The scale bars are 10 μm and the pH listed on the images corresponds to the pH of the solution when imaging.