| Literature DB >> 27980728 |
Izabela Janus1, Małgorzata Kandefer-Gola1, Rafał Ciaputa1, Agnieszka Noszczyk-Nowak2, Urszula Pasławska2, Massimiliano Tursi3, Marcin Nowak1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) are the most common diseases noted in dogs. Although their pathogenesis varies, both include a significant enlargement of the left atrium. The study was carried out on left atrial specimens obtained from 56 dogs, including those from 34 dogs with clinically diagnosed MMVD, 15 dogs with DCM and 7 dogs without heart disease (control group). Dogs in the MMVD and the DCM groups presented with left atrial enlargement and stage D heart failure. The specimens underwent immunohistochemical examination using desmin, vimentin, periostin and caspase-3 antibodies.Entities:
Keywords: DCM; Dilated cardiomyopathy; Immuniohistochemistry; Left atrium; MMVD; Myxomatous mitral valve disease
Year: 2016 PMID: 27980728 PMCID: PMC5134068 DOI: 10.1186/s13620-016-0077-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ir Vet J ISSN: 0368-0762 Impact factor: 2.146
The results of immunohistochemical examination in studied dogs
| Examined feature | DCM | MMVD | control |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DES intensity; median (range) | 1 (1–2)1 | 2 (1–3) | 2 (2–3)1 | 1 0.006 |
| DES %; average ± SD | 85.8 ± 10.9 | 84.8 ± 9.3 | 82.2 ± 8.6 | |
| DES Remmele; median (range) | 4 (3–8)1, 2 | 6 (4–9) 1 | 7 (6–10)2 | 1 0.03 |
| 2 0.001 | ||||
| DES desmosomes; median (range) | 0 (0–3)1 | 2 (0–3) | 2 (1–3)1 | 1 0.02 |
| VIM intensity; median (range) | 3 (2–3) | 3 (2–3) | 2 (2–3) | |
| VIM %; average ± SD | 15.3 ± 6.31,2 | 10.99 ± 5.71 | 10.5 ± 1.972 | 1 0.03 |
| 20.02 | ||||
| VIM Remmele; median (range) | 4 (2–6) | 3 (2–6) | 4 (3–5) | |
| PER intensity; median (range) | 1 (0–2) | 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–1) | |
| PER %; average ± SD | 27.96 ± 27.61 | 46.4 ± 28.5 | 67.76 ± 9.71 | 1 0.03 |
| PER Remmele; median (range) | 2 (0–3) | 3 (1–4) | 3 (3–3) | |
| CAS intensity; median (range) | 1 (0–2) | 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–2) | |
| CAS %; average ± SD | 46.9 ± 25.11,2 | 73.6 ± 24.91 | 84.6 ± 8.92 | 1 0.01 |
| 2 0.01 | ||||
| CAS Remmele; median (range) | 3 (1–4)1,2 | 4 (1–7)1 | 4 (3–9)2 | 1 0.01 |
| 2 0.01 |
DES desmin, VIM vimentin, PER periostin, CAS caspase, SD standard deviation, DCM dogs with dilated cardiomyopathy, MMVD dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease; superscripts (1,2) indicate values showing significant statistical difference.
All the cell markers were evaluated for: the intensity of expression (scored from 0: no expression to 3: strong expression), the percentage of cells showing positive expression, as well as the Remmele score (scored from 0 to 12, taking into account both the intensity of expression and percentage of positive cells). Additionally the cardiomyocyte desmosomes were evaluated for desmin expression from 0 (no visible desmosomes) to 3 (well visible desmosomes)
Type of the expression of cell markers in examined specimens in each group
| Antibody | Pattern of expression | DCM ( | MMVD (n; %) | Control ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DES | Regular, well-preserved striation | 3 (20%) | 19 (55.9%) | 7 (100%) |
| Irregular striation | 9 (60%) | 8 (23.5%) | 0 | |
| No expression | 3 (20%) | 7 (20.6%) | 0 | |
| DES (desm) | Well-visible | 3 (20%) | 12 (35.3%) | 7 (100%) |
| Faint | 9 (60%) | 14 (41.2%) | 0 | |
| No expression | 3 (20%) | 8 (23.5%) | 0 | |
| VIM | Abundant between cardiomyocytes | 5 (33.3%) | 2 (5.9%) | 1 (14.3%) |
| Sparse between cardiomyocytes | 4 (26.7%) | 26 (76.5%) | 6 (85.7%) | |
| No expression | 6 (40%) | 6 (17.6%) | 0 | |
| PER | Diffused cytoplasmic expression in cardiomyocytes with mild expression in interstitial tissue | 5 (33.3%) | 15 (44.1%) | 5 (71.4%) |
| Strong expression in interstitial tissue with mild cytoplasmic expression in cardiomyocytes | 5 (33.3%) | 10 (29.4%) | 0 | |
| No expression | 5 (33.3%) | 9 (26.5%) | 2 (28.6%) | |
| CAS | Diffuse strong cytoplasmic expression | 4 (26.7%) | 25 (73.5%) | 7 (100%) |
| Diffuse mild cytoplasmic expression | 10 (66.7%) | 6 (17.6%) | 0 | |
| No expression | 1 (6.7%) | 3 (8.8%) | 0 |
DES desmin, desm desmosomes, VIM vimentin, PER periostin, CAS caspase, DCM dogs with dilated cardiomyopathy, MMVD dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease
Desmin showed positive expression within the cardiomyocyte and was evaluated for the regularity and visibility of the cardiomyocyte cross-striation and for the visibility of desmosomes within the cardiomyocyte; vimentin showed positive expression within the interstitial tissue and no expression within the cardiomyocyte; periostin showed positive expression in both cardiomyocyte and interstitial tissue with variable intensity; caspase-3 showed positive expression only within the cardiomyocyte. All the cell markers showed cytoplasmic expression
Fig. 1The cytoplasmic expression of desmin in cardiomyocyte (brown) in examined groups (interstitial tissue stained blue; scale bar = 50 μm). a – DCM group: the cardiomyocytes are swollen and show irregular desmin expression scored 1 with no visible cross-striation; the desmosomes are not visible (score 0); b – MMVD group: cardiomyocyte with regular, well-preserved striation; the intensity of desmin expression scored 3; desmosomes are well visible (arrows; score 3); c – control group: cardiomyocyte with regular, well-preserved striation; the intensity of desmin expression scored 3; desmosomes are well visible (arrows; score 3)
Fig. 2The cytoplasmic expression of vimentin (brown; arrows) in interstitial tissue in examined groups (vimentin-negative cells stained blue; scale bar = 50 μm). a – DCM group: abundant vimentin-positive cells between cardiomyocyte; the vimentin-positive cells show staining intensity scored 3; b – MMVD group: sparse vimentin-positive cells between cardiomyocyte; the vimentin-positive cells show staining intensity scored 3; c – control group: sparse vimentin-positive cells between cardiomyocyte; the vimentin-positive cells show staining intensity scored 3
Fig. 3The cytoplasmic expression of periostin (brown) in examined groups (periostin-negative cells stained blue; scale bar = 50 μm). a – DCM group: strong expression in interstitial tissue (arrows) with intensity scored 2; b – MMVD group: diffused cytoplasmic expression in cardiomyocyte (*) with mild expression in interstitial tissue (arrows); intensity of expression scored 1; c – control group: diffused cytoplasmic expression in cardiomyocyte (*); intensity of expression scored 1
Fig. 4The cytoplasmic expression of caspase-3 (brown) in examined groups (caspase-3-negative cells stained blue; scale bar = 50 μm). a – DCM group: diffuse mild cytoplasmic expression in cardiomyocyte (*) scored 1; approximately 60% of cardiomyocyte showing positive expression; b – MMVD group: diffuse strong cytoplasmic expression in cardiomyocyte (*) scored 2; over 90% of cardiomyocyte show positive expression; c – control group: diffuse strong cytoplasmic expression in cardiomyocyte (*) scored 2; over 90% of cardiomyocyte show positive expression