Literature DB >> 27980468

Are Electrode Caps Worth the Investment? An Evaluation of EEG Methods in Undergraduate Neuroscience Laboratory Courses and Research.

Stephanie M Shields1, Caitlin E Morse1, E Drew Applebaugh1, Tyler L Muntz1, David F Nichols1.   

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a common neuroscience technique that is more accessible to undergraduate programs than expensive techniques such as fMRI and single-cell recording. The use of EEG can provide undergraduates with firsthand neuroscience research experience without taking too many financial resources away from a program. There are multiple types of EEG equipment that can be used, including individual electrodes and electrode caps. This study used surveys administered to students who were in a neuroscience laboratory course, conducting research, or participating in research in order to discern which of these two EEG setups is preferred by undergraduates. According to average reaction scores calculated from the surveys, laboratory students tended to prefer individual electrodes over electrode caps, and when explicitly asked about their overall preference, a majority of laboratory students chose individual electrodes over electrode caps. Additionally, comparable levels of improvement in learning objectives and the quality of data collected in laboratory sessions were found across methods. Student researchers' ratings revealed a marginal preference for caps over individual electrodes, and all 5 researchers surveyed chose caps on a discriminate choice question. Research participants' ratings of caps and individual electrodes, however, were not significantly different. These results do not point to a concrete recommendation of one setup over the other but rather suggest that either setup could be a viable option. Therefore, we conclude that programs can comfortably decide which to use based on their own needs and resources as well as the relative advantages and disadvantages of each setup. For example, individual electrodes may be better for programs with low budgets looking to introduce students to EEG data recording, whereas electrode caps may be better for programs looking to better prepare students for future EEG research or to perform multichannel recordings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; electrode caps; individual electrodes

Year:  2016        PMID: 27980468      PMCID: PMC5105961     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ        ISSN: 1544-2896


  7 in total

1.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria.

Authors:  T W Picton; S Bentin; P Berg; E Donchin; S A Hillyard; R Johnson; G A Miller; W Ritter; D S Ruchkin; M D Rugg; M J Taylor
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  A Series of Computational Neuroscience Labs Increases Comfort with MATLAB.

Authors:  David F Nichols
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2015-10-15

3.  A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates' perception and confidence of their abilities to read scientific literature and communicate science.

Authors:  Sara E Brownell; Jordan V Price; Lawrence Steinman
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  Incorporating an ERP Project into Undergraduate Instruction.

Authors:  Erika Nyhus; Nancy Curtis
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2016-04-15

5.  An electrode cap tested.

Authors:  J L Blom; M Anneveldt
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-11

6.  Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality.

Authors:  T C Ferree; P Luu; G S Russell; D M Tucker
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Virtual EEG: A Software-Based Electroencephalogram Designed for Undergraduate Neuroscience-Related Courses.

Authors:  Benjamin R Miller; Melissa Troyer; Thomas Busey
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2008-10-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.