Howard I Scher1, Ryon P Graf2, Nicole A Schreiber3, Brigit McLaughlin3, David Lu2, Jessica Louw2, Daniel C Danila4, Lyndsey Dugan2, Ann Johnson2, Glenn Heller5, Martin Fleisher6, Ryan Dittamore2. 1. Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: scherh@mskcc.org. 2. Epic Sciences, La Jolla, CA, USA. 3. Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. 5. Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 6. Clinical Chemistry Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) expressing AR-V7 protein localized to the nucleus (nuclear-specific) identify metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with improved overall survival (OS) on taxane therapy relative to the androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if expanding the positivity criteria to include both nuclear and cytoplasmic AR-V7 localization ("nuclear-agnostic") identifies more patients who would benefit from a taxane over an ARSi. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study used a cross-sectional cohort. Between December 2012 and March 2015, 193 pretherapy blood samples, 191 of which were evaluable, were collected and processed from 161 unique mCRPC patients before starting a new line of systemic therapy for disease progression at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The association between two AR-V7 scoring criteria, post-therapy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change (PTPC) and OS following ARSi or taxane treatment, was explored. One criterion required nuclear-specific AR-V7 localization, and the other required an AR-V7 signal but was agnostic to protein localization in CTCs. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Correlation of AR-V7 status to PTPC and OS was investigated. Relationships with survival were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression and log-rank analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 34 (18%) samples were AR-V7-positive using nuclear-specific criteria, and 56 (29%) were AR-V7-positive using nuclear-agnostic criteria. Following ARSi treatment, none of the 16 nuclear-specific AR-V7-positive samples and six of the 32 (19%) nuclear-agnostic AR-V7-positive samples had ≥50% PTPC at 12 weeks. The strongest baseline factor influencing OS was the interaction between the presence of nuclear-specific AR-V7-positive CTCs and treatment with a taxane (hazard ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.078-0.79; p=0.019). This interaction was not significant when nuclear-agnostic criteria were used. CONCLUSIONS: To reliably inform treatment selection using an AR-V7 protein biomarker in CTCs, nuclear-specific localization is required. PATIENT SUMMARY: We analyzed outcomes for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer on androgen receptor signaling inhibitors and standard chemotherapy. Patients with circulating tumor cells that had AR-V7 protein in the cellular nuclei were very likely to survive longer on taxane-based chemotherapy, and tests unable to distinguish where the protein is located in the cell are not as predictive of benefit.
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) expressing AR-V7 protein localized to the nucleus (nuclear-specific) identify metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with improved overall survival (OS) on taxane therapy relative to the androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if expanding the positivity criteria to include both nuclear and cytoplasmic AR-V7 localization ("nuclear-agnostic") identifies more patients who would benefit from a taxane over an ARSi. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study used a cross-sectional cohort. Between December 2012 and March 2015, 193 pretherapy blood samples, 191 of which were evaluable, were collected and processed from 161 unique mCRPC patients before starting a new line of systemic therapy for disease progression at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The association between two AR-V7 scoring criteria, post-therapy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change (PTPC) and OS following ARSi or taxane treatment, was explored. One criterion required nuclear-specific AR-V7 localization, and the other required an AR-V7 signal but was agnostic to protein localization in CTCs. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Correlation of AR-V7 status to PTPC and OS was investigated. Relationships with survival were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression and log-rank analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 34 (18%) samples were AR-V7-positive using nuclear-specific criteria, and 56 (29%) were AR-V7-positive using nuclear-agnostic criteria. Following ARSi treatment, none of the 16 nuclear-specific AR-V7-positive samples and six of the 32 (19%) nuclear-agnostic AR-V7-positive samples had ≥50% PTPC at 12 weeks. The strongest baseline factor influencing OS was the interaction between the presence of nuclear-specific AR-V7-positive CTCs and treatment with a taxane (hazard ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.078-0.79; p=0.019). This interaction was not significant when nuclear-agnostic criteria were used. CONCLUSIONS: To reliably inform treatment selection using an AR-V7 protein biomarker in CTCs, nuclear-specific localization is required. PATIENT SUMMARY: We analyzed outcomes for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer on androgen receptor signaling inhibitors and standard chemotherapy. Patients with circulating tumor cells that had AR-V7 protein in the cellular nuclei were very likely to survive longer on taxane-based chemotherapy, and tests unable to distinguish where the protein is located in the cell are not as predictive of benefit.
Authors: Fangfang Qu; Wanling Xie; Mari Nakabayashi; Haitao Zhang; Seong Ho Jeong; Xiaodong Wang; Kazumasa Komura; Christopher J Sweeney; Oliver Sartor; Gwo-Shu Mary Lee; Philip W Kantoff Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M Nakazawa; C Lu; Y Chen; C J Paller; M A Carducci; M A Eisenberger; J Luo; E S Antonarakis Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Eleni Efstathiou; Mark Titus; Sijin Wen; Anh Hoang; Maria Karlou; Robynne Ashe; Shi Ming Tu; Ana Aparicio; Patricia Troncoso; James Mohler; Christopher J Logothetis Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Wendy Onstenk; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Jaco Kraan; Mai Van; Annemieke J M Nieuweboer; Ron H J Mathijssen; Paul Hamberg; Hielke J Meulenbeld; Bram De Laere; Luc Y Dirix; Robert J van Soest; Martijn P Lolkema; John W M Martens; Wytske M van Weerden; Guido W Jenster; John A Foekens; Ronald de Wit; Stefan Sleijfer Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Elizabeth A Punnoose; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Edith Szafer-Glusman; Eric K Tucker; Sankar Mohan; Penelope Flohr; Ruth Riisnaes; Susana Miranda; Ines Figueiredo; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Aurelius Omlin; Carmel Pezaro; Jin Zhu; Lukas Amler; Premal Patel; Yibing Yan; Natalee Bales; Shannon L Werner; Jessica Louw; Ajay Pandita; Dena Marrinucci; Gerhardt Attard; Johann de Bono Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Howard I Scher; David Lu; Nicole A Schreiber; Jessica Louw; Ryon P Graf; Hebert A Vargas; Ann Johnson; Adam Jendrisak; Richard Bambury; Daniel Danila; Brigit McLaughlin; Justin Wahl; Stephanie B Greene; Glenn Heller; Dena Marrinucci; Martin Fleisher; Ryan Dittamore Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Howard I Scher; Ryon P Graf; Nicole A Schreiber; Anuradha Jayaram; Eric Winquist; Brigit McLaughlin; David Lu; Martin Fleisher; Sarah Orr; Lori Lowes; Amanda Anderson; Yipeng Wang; Ryan Dittamore; Alison L Allan; Gerhardt Attard; Glenn Heller Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Emma E van der Toom; Haley D Axelrod; Jean J de la Rosette; Theo M de Reijke; Kenneth J Pienta; Kenneth C Valkenburg Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Kristina Stuopelyte; Rasa Sabaliauskaite; Arnas Bakavicius; Benedikta S Haflidadóttir; Tapio Visakorpi; Riina-Minna Väänänen; Chintan Patel; Daniel C Danila; Hans Lilja; Juozas R Lazutka; Albertas Ulys; Feliksas Jankevicius; Sonata Jarmalaite Journal: J Urol Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Emmanuelle Hodara; Gareth Morrison; Alexander Cunha; Daniel Zainfeld; Tong Xu; Yucheng Xu; Paul W Dempsey; Paul C Pagano; Farideh Bischoff; Aditi Khurana; Samuel Koo; Marc Ting; Philip D Cotter; Mathew W Moore; Shelly Gunn; Joshua Usher; Shahrooz Rabizadeh; Peter Danenberg; Kathleen Danenberg; John Carpten; Tanya Dorff; David Quinn; Amir Goldkorn Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-03-07
Authors: Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Jun Luo; Andrew J Armstrong; Landon C Brown; Changxue Lu Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 5.554