Literature DB >> 27974394

rTMS affects working memory performance, brain activation and functional connectivity in patients with multiple sclerosis.

H E Hulst1, T Goldschmidt1, M A Nitsche2,3, S J de Wit4, O A van den Heuvel1,4, F Barkhof5, W Paulus6,7, Y D van der Werf1, J J G Geurts1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on working memory performance, while measuring task-related brain activation and task-related brain connectivity in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).
METHODS: 17 patients with MS and 11 healthy controls (HCs) underwent 3 experimental sessions (baseline, real-rTMS, sham-rTMS), all including an N-back task (3 task loads: N1, N2, N3; control condition: N0) inside the MR scanner. Prior to imaging, real-rTMS (10 Hz) was applied to the right DLPFC. The stimulation site was defined based on individually assessed N-back task activation at baseline and located using neuronavigation. Changes in whole brain functional activation and functional connectivity with the right DLPFC were calculated.
RESULTS: N-back task accuracy (N2 and N3) improved after real-rTMS (and not after sham-rTMS) compared with baseline (p=0.029 and p=0.015, respectively), only in patients. At baseline, patients with MS, compared with HCs, showed higher task-related frontal activation (left DLPFC, N2>N0), which disappeared after real-rTMS. Task-related (N1>N0) functional connectivity between the right DLPFC and the right caudate nucleus and bilateral (para)cingulate gyrus increased in patients after real-rTMS when compared with sham stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MS, N-back accuracy improved while frontal hyperactivation (seen at baseline relative to HCs) disappeared after real-rTMS. Together with the changes in functional connectivity after real-rTMS in patients, these findings may represent an rTMS-induced change in network efficiency in patients with MS, shifting patients' brain function towards the healthy situation. This implicates a potentially relevant role for rTMS in cognitive rehabilitation in MS. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27974394     DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  22 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Kedar R Mahajan; Daniel Ontaneda
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Neurological Diseases.

Authors:  Fahad A Somaa; Tom A de Graaf; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  Network alterations underlying anxiety symptoms in early multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Erik Ellwardt; Muthuraman Muthuraman; Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla; Venkata Chaitanya Chirumamilla; Felix Luessi; Stefan Bittner; Frauke Zipp; Sergiu Groppa; Vinzenz Fleischer
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 9.587

Review 4.  Mind the gap: from neurons to networks to outcomes in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Declan T Chard; Adnan A S Alahmadi; Bertrand Audoin; Thalis Charalambous; Christian Enzinger; Hanneke E Hulst; Maria A Rocca; Àlex Rovira; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Menno M Schoonheim; Betty Tijms; Carmen Tur; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott; Alle Meije Wink; Olga Ciccarelli; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 5.  Remodeling Functional Connectivity in Multiple Sclerosis: A Challenging Therapeutic Approach.

Authors:  Mario Stampanoni Bassi; Luana Gilio; Fabio Buttari; Pierpaolo Maffei; Girolama A Marfia; Domenico A Restivo; Diego Centonze; Ennio Iezzi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 6.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Cognition, and Multiple Sclerosis: An Overview.

Authors:  Grigorios Nasios; Lambros Messinis; Efthimios Dardiotis; Panagiotis Papathanasopoulos
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.342

7.  Neuropsychological Features of Multiple Sclerosis: Impact and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Lambros Messinis; Panagiotis Papathanasopoulos; Mary H Kosmidis; Grigorios Nasios; Maria Kambanaros
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 8.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Potential Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review with Recommendations for Future Research.

Authors:  Nicholas J Snow; Katie P Wadden; Arthur R Chaves; Michelle Ploughman
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 9.  How changes in brain activity and connectivity are associated with motor performance in people with MS.

Authors:  Daniel S Peterson; Brett W Fling
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Continuous theta-burst stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex inhibits improvement on a working memory task.

Authors:  Teodóra Vékony; Viola Luca Németh; Adrienn Holczer; Krisztián Kocsis; Zsigmond Tamás Kincses; László Vécsei; Anita Must
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.