Raya Ahmed1, Laureline Roger2, Pedro Costa Del Amo3, Kelly L Miners2, Rhiannon E Jones4, Lies Boelen3, Tinhinane Fali5, Marjet Elemans3, Yan Zhang1, Victor Appay5, Duncan M Baird4, Becca Asquith3, David A Price6, Derek C Macallan7, Kristin Ladell8. 1. Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK. 2. Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK. 3. Department of Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK. 4. Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK. 5. Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses (CIMI-Paris), 75013 Paris, France; INSERM U1135, CIMI-Paris, 75013 Paris, France. 6. Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: priced6@cardiff.ac.uk. 7. Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK; St. George's University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK. Electronic address: macallan@sgul.ac.uk. 8. Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK. Electronic address: ladellk@gmail.com.
Abstract
Adaptive immunity requires the generation of memory T cells from naive precursors selected in the thymus. The key intermediaries in this process are stem cell-like memory T (TSCM) cells, multipotent progenitors that can both self-renew and replenish more differentiated subsets of memory T cells. In theory, antigen specificity within the TSCM pool may be imprinted statically as a function of largely dormant cells and/or retained dynamically by more transitory subpopulations. To explore the origins of immunological memory, we measured the turnover of TSCM cells in vivo using stable isotope labeling with heavy water. The data indicate that TSCM cells in both young and elderly subjects are maintained by ongoing proliferation. In line with this finding, TSCM cells displayed limited telomere length erosion coupled with high expression levels of active telomerase and Ki67. Collectively, these observations show that TSCM cells exist in a state of perpetual flux throughout the human lifespan.
Adaptive immunity requires the generation of memory T cells from naive precursors selected in the thymus. The key intermediaries in this process are stem cell-like memory T (TSCM) cells, multipotent progenitors that can both self-renew and replenish more differentiated subsets of memory T cells. In theory, antigen specificity within the TSCM pool may be imprinted statically as a function of largely dormant cells and/or retained dynamically by more transitory subpopulations. To explore the origins of immunological memory, we measured the turnover of TSCM cells in vivo using stable isotope labeling with heavy water. The data indicate that TSCM cells in both young and elderly subjects are maintained by ongoing proliferation. In line with this finding, TSCM cells displayed limited telomere length erosion coupled with high expression levels of active telomerase and Ki67. Collectively, these observations show that TSCM cells exist in a state of perpetual flux throughout the human lifespan.
Keywords:
CD4(+) T cells; CD8(+) T cells; adaptive immunity; in vivo heavy water labeling; memory T cell maintenance; memory T cells; proliferation; stem cell-like memory T cells; telomerase activity; telomere length
Antigen encounter drives the formation of heterogeneous memory T cell populations, which deploy various effector functions with accelerated kinetics to ensure long-term protective immunity (Chang et al., 2014, Farber et al., 2014). The recently described stem cell-like memory T (TSCM) subset typically comprises 2%–3% of the circulating T cell pool and can be identified within a naive-like phenotype (CD45RA+CD45RO–CCR7+CD62L+CD27+CD28+) by expression of the memory marker CD95 (Gattinoni et al., 2011). In accordance with this definition, TSCM cells mount anamnestic responses and display gene transcript profiles encompassing features of both naive T (TN) and central memory T (TCM) cells (Gattinoni et al., 2011). Moreover, TSCM cells are endowed with considerable proliferative reserves and can differentiate in vitro and in vivo to reconstitute the entire spectrum of classically delineated memory T cells (Gattinoni et al., 2011). These characteristics suggest an antecedent role for TSCM cells in the complex antigen-driven processes that ultimately capture and preserve immunological memories.It is established that TSCM cells persist at stable frequencies throughout the human lifespan (Di Benedetto et al., 2015). However, the mechanisms that underlie this remarkable longevity are incompletely defined. Two mutually non-exclusive possibilities exist: (1) TSCM cells may endure under conditions of relative dormancy with prolonged survival; and/or (2) the TSCM pool may be sustained by ongoing proliferation and cell turnover. In this study, we provide evidence consistent with the latter scenario and demonstrate that TSCM cells are maintained in a state of dynamic flux.
Results and Discussion
To investigate how TSCM cells are maintained in humans, we conducted a long-term (7-week) stable isotope (2H2O) labeling study (Figure 1A). Deuterium (2H) enrichment of DNA extracted from rigorously sort-purified T cell subsets (Figure 1B) was measured at defined intervals using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Neese et al., 2002, Busch et al., 2007). CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM cells rapidly incorporated 2H during the labeling phase and lost 2H during the delabeling phase (Figures 1D and S1). Moreover, the fractions of labeled CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM cells were higher in the majority of subjects compared with the corresponding lineage-defined CD45RA– and CD45RA+CD45RO+ memory T cells (Figure 2). Consistent with previous reports (Hellerstein et al., 2003, Ladell et al., 2008, Vrisekoop et al., 2008), we found only low levels of 2H enrichment in the TN subset. These cells accumulated further label after 2H2O administration was discontinued, likely reflecting TN cell proliferation in lymphoid tissue with delayed exit into the peripheral blood (Hellerstein et al., 2003). Given that 2H is incorporated into newly synthesized DNA generated during cell division, this dataset suggests that TSCM cells are maintained in vivo by extensive proliferation.
Figure 1
Label Incorporation in Naive and Stem Cell-like Memory T Cells
(A) Schematic representation of the 2H2O-labeling protocol and sampling time points.
(B) Successive panels depict the flow cytometric gating strategy used to sort CD4+ and CD8+ TN and TSCM cells. Lymphocytes were identified in a forward-scatter versus side-scatter plot, and single cells were resolved in a forward-scatter-height versus forward-scatter-area plot. Boolean gates were drawn for analysis only to exclude fluorochrome aggregates. Live CD3+CD14–CD19– cells were assigned to the CD4+ or CD8+ lineage, and potentially naive CD27brightCD45RO– cells were separated from memory T cells. Sort gates were then fixed on CCR7+CD95– TN cells and CCR7+CD95+ TSCM cells. Histogram overlays show expression of CD28, CD45RA, CD57, and CD127 in the TN, TSCM, and memory subsets.
(C) Schematic representation of the mathematical models applied to the labeling data. In the depicted variation, a precursor compartment replenishes TN cells, which do not proliferate. Two further variations were considered, one eliminating the precursor compartment, and the other assuming TN cell proliferation. Similar results were obtained with all three variations.
(D) Experimental labeling data (black filled circles) and modeled curve fits for subject DW01 (young adult). The curve fits for model 1 overlie the curve fits for model 2.
Figure 2
Comparative Label Enrichment in Naive, Stem Cell-like Memory and Other Memory T Cells
Experimental labeling data for TN, TSCM, CD45RA– memory, and CD45RA+CD45RO+ transitional memory T cells from subjects DW01, DW09, DW10, and DW11 (young adults), and DW04, DW03, and DW02 (elderly).
To explore the source of label enrichment within the TSCM pool, we considered four mathematical models of linear differentiation (Figure 1C). Two scenarios were postulated for TSCM cells (dividing or non-dividing), and two scenarios were postulated for TN cells (differentiation is accompanied or not accompanied by division, with the latter assuming that one TN cell gives rise to one TSCM cell). The model in which neither TN nor TSCM cells were free to proliferate could be excluded on the basis of the labeling data (Figures 1D and S1). Although it was not possible to separate the remaining models, all three indicated considerable replacement rates for the TSCM population across lineages and subjects (median, 0.02 per day; inter-quartile range, 0.016–0.037 per day). These findings concur with the empirical view that recurrent cell division sustains the TSCM compartment.To substantiate this conclusion, we measured the expression of Ki67, which is limited to active phases of the cell cycle (Scholzen and Gerdes, 2000). High frequencies of Ki67+ TSCM cells were detected in both the CD4+ and CD8+ lineages (Figures 3A and 3B). In contrast, Ki67+ events were rare in the corresponding TN populations. A similar dichotomy prevails in macaques (Lugli et al., 2013). It has been shown previously that TN cells can divide and retain a naive-like phenotype (Hellerstein et al., 2003, Ladell et al., 2008, Ladell et al., 2015). Proliferation is therefore not necessarily linked with differentiation, a finding that also holds for TSCM cells in vitro under certain conditions (Gattinoni et al., 2011). Moreover, TSCM cells stimulated with the homeostatic cytokine interleukin (IL)-15 in vitro can divide repeatedly over 10 days, whereas TN cells generally divide once or twice up to a maximum of four times in the same period (Gattinoni et al., 2011). These considerations support a model of self-renewal within the TSCM pool.
Figure 3
Ki67 Expression in Naive, Stem Cell-like Memory, and Other Memory T Cells
(A) Intracellular Ki67 expression in the depicted T cell subsets from subject DW01 (young adult). Live CD3+CD14–CD19– lymphocytes within the CD4+ and CD8+ lineages were identified as shown in Figure 1B. Conservative gates were placed around CCR7+CD95– TN cells and CCR7+CD95+ TSCM cells within a naive-like phenotype (CD45RAbrightCCR7+).
(B) Intracellular Ki67 expression in CD4+ (left) and CD8+ (right) T cell subsets from healthy adult volunteers and subject DW01 (young adult). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stained in triplicate directly ex vivo. Horizontal bars represent mean values with SEs. TCM (CD45RA–CCR7+); TEMRA (CD45RA+CCR7–). Significance was assessed using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. Asterisks indicate p < 0.001 for all comparisons.
To corroborate the finding that TSCM cells manifest higher rates of turnover in vivo relative to TN cells, we used single telomere length analysis (Baird et al., 2003) to determine the replicative history of these distinct subsets (Figures 4A and S2A). Individual telomere lengths were distributed around a significantly lower mean in the TSCM population compared with the TN population (CD4+ T cells, p = 0.0002; CD8+ T cells, p = 0.0007; two-tailed Mann-Whitney p values pooled by Fisher’s method) (Figures 4B and S2B). Moreover, TSCM cells displayed higher levels of telomerase activity than either TN or other memory T cells (Figure S2C). In the absence of telomerase activity, telomeres erode by 90 bp each time a population doubles in size (Baird et al., 2003). The telomere length differentials between TSCM and TN cells ranged from 370 to 1,489 bp (mean, 787 bp; Figures 4A, 4B, S2A, and S2B), equivalent to a maximum of almost 17 doublings at the population level. However, the true proliferative disparity will be substantially larger because telomerase markedly slows the rate of telomere erosion. These data are again indicative of considerable turnover within the TSCM compartment and further suggest a biological requirement for self-maintenance.
Figure 4
Telomere Lengths in Naive and Stem Cell-like Memory T Cells
(A) Representative single telomere length analysis data from subjects DW02 (elderly), DW01 (young adult), and DW04 (elderly). Single telomere length analysis was conducted at the XpYp telomere for CD4+ and CD8+ TN and TSCM cells. Mean values and telomere length differentials are shown (bottom).
(B) XpYp telomere length distributions as scatterplots. Significance was assessed using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test.
It remains unclear whether the T cell differentiation pathway is linear or bifurcated, with the latter model proposing that a single TN cell gives rise to both a short-lived effector and a long-lived memory T cell (Arsenio et al., 2015, Flossdorf et al., 2015). There is some evidence for asymmetric division within the TN pool (Chang et al., 2007, Arsenio et al., 2014), whereas other reports ascribe stemness to the TCM pool (Graef et al., 2014). Irrespective of this ongoing debate, TSCM cells are ideally equipped to amplify and preserve clonotypically encoded immunological memories (Gattinoni et al., 2011). In simian immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques, antigen-specific TSCM cells display a 10-fold greater capacity to survive compared with TCM cells following the loss of cognate antigen (Lugli et al., 2013). Similarly, vaccine-induced TSCM cells can persist for decades with a naive-like profile (Fuertes Marraco et al., 2015). The TSCM compartment is also preserved in HIV-infected individuals on long-term anti-retroviral therapy (Vigano et al., 2015), despite the presence of a latent viral reservoir in the CD4+ lineage (Jaafoura et al., 2014, Buzon et al., 2014). Further evidence attests to the proliferative capacity of TSCM cells. In humans, the administration of cyclophosphamide after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation eradicates TSCM cells, but leaves the TN compartment largely intact (Roberto et al., 2015). Moreover, immune reconstitution is preferentially driven by TSCM cells, at least in mice (Gattinoni et al., 2011). It therefore seems likely that the rapid turnover of TSCM cells at the whole-population level reflects a composite of kinetically distinct subsets, potentially dissociated by transcriptional integration of variable antigenic stimuli and other immune activation signals (Cartwright et al., 2014, Lugli et al., 2013, Roychoudhuri et al., 2016). The data presented here are consistent with such divergent outcomes and suggest that nascent immunological memory is encapsulated within fluid cellular networks.
Experimental Procedures
Human Samples
Seven healthy adults participated in the labeling study. Recruitment was stratified to include both young (aged 29–47 years) and elderly (aged 64–83 years) subjects, all of whom tested seropositive for cytomegalovirus and seronegative for HIV. Further peripheral blood samples were obtained from healthy adult volunteers. Approval was granted by the Cardiff University School of Medicine and London-Chelsea Research Ethics Committees. All studies were conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
In Vivo Labeling
Study participants ingested small doses of 70% deuterated water (2H2O) over a 7-week period (50 ml three times daily for 1 week, then twice daily thereafter). Saliva samples were collected weekly for evaluation of body water labeling rates. Peripheral blood was collected at baseline and then at weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14, and 18. In one case (DW01), two further samples were collected (weeks 21 and 32).
Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated using standard density gradient centrifugation and stained with Live/Dead Fixable Aqua (Life Technologies), and anti-CD14-V500 and anti-CD19-V500 (BD Horizon) to exclude irrelevant signals from the analysis. The following monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were used in further stains: (1) anti-CD3-H7APC, anti-CD28-APC, anti-CD45RA-PE, and anti-CD57-FITC (BD Pharmingen); (2) anti-CD4-Cy5.5PE and anti-CD27-QD605 (Life Technologies); (3) anti-CD45RO-ECD (Beckman Coulter); and (4) anti-CD8-BV711, anti-CD127-BV421, and anti-PD-1-BV421 (BioLegend). Naive (CD27brightCD45RO–CCR7+CD95–), stem cell-like memory (CD27brightCD45RO–CCR7+CD95+), transitional memory (CD45RA+CD45RO+), and memory (CD45RA–) CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were sorted at >98% purity using a custom-modified FACSAria II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Intracellular expression of Ki67 was evaluated separately using an Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated mAb in conjunction with a Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed with FlowJo software, version 9.7.6 (Tree Star).
Measurement and Analysis of 2H Enrichment in T Cell DNA
The stable isotope-based method for measuring T cell proliferation has been described previously (Hellerstein et al., 1999, McCune et al., 2000, Neese et al., 2001). Additional precautions and controls were incorporated to ensure the accurate quantification of 2H enrichment in low-abundance samples (Busch et al., 2007). Briefly, DNA from sort-purified T cell subsets was released by boiling and hydrolyzed according to standard protocols. Deoxyribonucleosides were derivatized using pentafluorobenzyl hydroxylamine (Sigma-Aldrich). Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Agilent 5873/6980) was performed in negative chemical ionization mode using a DB-17 column (J&W Scientific; Agilent). The M+1/M+0 isotopomer ratio was monitored at mass-to-charge (m/z) 436/435. To normalize for body water enrichment, weekly saliva samples were analyzed for 2H2O content via calcium carbide-induced acetylene generation, monitoring at m/z 27/26 (Previs et al., 1996).
Single Telomere Length Analysis
DNA was extracted from 3,000 sort-purified T cells using a QIAmp DNA Micro Kit (QIAGEN). Single telomere length analysis was carried out at the XpYp telomere as described previously (Capper et al., 2007). Briefly, 1 μM of the Telorette-2 linker was added to purified genomic DNA in a final volume of 40 μL per sample. Multiple PCRs were performed for each test DNA in 10-μL volumes incorporating 250 pg of DNA and 0.5 μM of the telomere-adjacent and Teltail primers in 75 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.8, 20 mM (NH4)2SO4, 0.01% Tween-20, and 1.5 mM MgCl2, with 0.5 U of a 10:1 mixture of Taq (ABGene) and Pwo polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The reactions were processed in a Tetrad2 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad). DNA fragments were resolved by 0.5% Tris-acetate-EDTA agarose gel electrophoresis and identified by Southern hybridization with a random-primed α-33P-labeled (PerkinElmer) TTAGGG repeat probe, together with probes specific for the 1-kb (Stratagene) and 2.5-kb (Bio-Rad) molecular weight markers. Hybridized fragments were detected using a Typhoon FLA 9500 Phosphorimager (GE Healthcare). The molecular weights of the DNA fragments were calculated using a Phoretix 1D Quantifier (Nonlinear Dynamics).
Telomerase Activity
Sort-purified T cells were lyzed and assayed in two steps using a modified SYBR Green real-time quantitative telomerase repeat amplification protocol (Wege et al., 2003). Standard curves were obtained from serial dilutions of a 293T cell extract with known telomerase activity. Experimental telomerase activity was calculated with reference to 293T cells and expressed as relative telomerase activity (Ct293T/Ctsample).
Mathematical Modeling
Four mathematical models describing the relationship between TN and TSCM cells were constructed using ordinary differential equations and fitted to the labeling data in R. Two variations were also considered for each model: (1) proliferation was factored into the peripheral blood TN pool; and (2) the precursor compartment was omitted for TN cells. None of these variants yielded better predictions than the original models. The following equations were used to describe the rate of change of the fraction of labeled DNA in the precursor and TN compartments:where represents the rate at which naive cells move from A to , is the disappearance rate of TN cells in the blood, is the differentiation rate (associated with proliferation in models 1 and 2) of TN into TSCM cells, c is the amplification factor for enrichment, and U is the function describing labeling and delabeling in saliva. The following equations were used for the TSCM pool:where is the rate of proliferation within the TSCM pool and is the ratio of the sizes of the TN and TSCM pools measured experimentally. Model fits were compared using the corrected Akaike information criterion (Burnham and Anderson, 2002).
Statistical Analysis
Telomere lengths between the TN and TSCM populations were compared using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. The p values were pooled using Fisher’s method.
Author Contributions
R.A., L.R., K.L.M., R.E.J., T.F., Y.Z., and K.L. carried out experiments. R.A., L.R., R.E.J., V.A., D.M.B., D.C.M., and K.L. analyzed data. P.C.d.A., L.B., M.E., and B.A. modeled data. D.A.P., D.C.M., and K.L. designed experiments. P.C.d.A., L.B., V.A., D.M.B., and B.A. edited the manuscript. D.A.P., D.C.M., and K.L. wrote the manuscript.
Authors: Silvia A Fuertes Marraco; Charlotte Soneson; Laurène Cagnon; Philippe O Gannon; Mathilde Allard; Samia Abed Maillard; Nicole Montandon; Nathalie Rufer; Sophie Waldvogel; Mauro Delorenzi; Daniel E Speiser Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Patricia Graef; Veit R Buchholz; Christian Stemberger; Michael Flossdorf; Lynette Henkel; Matthias Schiemann; Ingo Drexler; Thomas Höfer; Stanley R Riddell; Dirk H Busch Journal: Immunity Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: R A Neese; L M Misell; S Turner; A Chu; J Kim; D Cesar; R Hoh; F Antelo; A Strawford; J M McCune; M Christiansen; M K Hellerstein Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-11-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kristin Ladell; Mette D Hazenberg; Mark Fitch; Claire Emson; Bridget K McEvoy-Hein Asgarian; Jeff E Mold; Corey Miller; Robert Busch; David A Price; Marc K Hellerstein; Joseph M McCune Journal: J Immunol Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: S Jaafoura; M G de Goër de Herve; E A Hernandez-Vargas; H Hendel-Chavez; M Abdoh; M C Mateo; R Krzysiek; M Merad; R Seng; M Tardieu; J F Delfraissy; C Goujard; Y Taoufik Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-11-10 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Rahul Roychoudhuri; David Clever; Peng Li; Yoshiyuki Wakabayashi; Kylie M Quinn; Christopher A Klebanoff; Yun Ji; Madhusudhanan Sukumar; Robert L Eil; Zhiya Yu; Rosanne Spolski; Douglas C Palmer; Jenny H Pan; Shashank J Patel; Derek C Macallan; Giulia Fabozzi; Han-Yu Shih; Yuka Kanno; Akihiko Muto; Jun Zhu; Luca Gattinoni; John J O'Shea; Klaus Okkenhaug; Kazuhiko Igarashi; Warren J Leonard; Nicholas P Restifo Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Emily K Cartwright; Colleen S McGary; Barbara Cervasi; Luca Micci; Benton Lawson; Sarah T C Elliott; Ronald G Collman; Steven E Bosinger; Mirko Paiardini; Thomas H Vanderford; Ann Chahroudi; Guido Silvestri Journal: J Immunol Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Janilyn Arsenio; Boyko Kakaradov; Patrick J Metz; Stephanie H Kim; Gene W Yeo; John T Chang Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2014-03-02 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Vivek Verma; Nazli Jafarzadeh; Shannon Boi; Subhadip Kundu; Zhinuo Jiang; Yiping Fan; Jose Lopez; Rahul Nandre; Peng Zeng; Fatmah Alolaqi; Shamim Ahmad; Pankaj Gaur; Simon T Barry; Viia E Valge-Archer; Paul D Smith; Jacques Banchereau; Mikayel Mkrtichyan; Benjamin Youngblood; Paulo C Rodriguez; Seema Gupta; Samir N Khleif Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Rama S Akondy; Mark Fitch; Srilatha Edupuganti; Shu Yang; Haydn T Kissick; Kelvin W Li; Ben A Youngblood; Hossam A Abdelsamed; Donald J McGuire; Kristen W Cohen; Gabriela Alexe; Shashi Nagar; Megan M McCausland; Satish Gupta; Pramila Tata; W Nicholas Haining; M Juliana McElrath; David Zhang; Bin Hu; William J Greenleaf; Jorg J Goronzy; Mark J Mulligan; Marc Hellerstein; Rafi Ahmed Journal: Nature Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Michelle L McCully; Kristin Ladell; Robert Andrews; Rhiannon E Jones; Kelly L Miners; Laureline Roger; Duncan M Baird; Mark J Cameron; Zita M Jessop; Iain S Whitaker; Eleri L Davies; David A Price; Bernhard Moser Journal: J Immunol Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 5.422