Literature DB >> 27973716

Is Mitochondrial Donation Germ-Line Gene Therapy? Classifications and Ethical Implications.

Ainsley J Newson, Anthony Wrigley.   

Abstract

The classification of techniques used in mitochondrial donation, including their role as purported germ-line gene therapies, is far from clear. These techniques exhibit characteristics typical of a variety of classifications that have been used in both scientific and bioethics scholarship. This raises two connected questions, which we address in this paper: (i) how should we classify mitochondrial donation techniques?; and (ii) what ethical implications surround such a classification? First, we outline how methods of genetic intervention, such as germ-line gene therapy, are typically defined or classified. We then consider whether techniques of mitochondrial donation fit into these, whether they might do so with some refinement of these categories, or whether they require some other approach to classification. To answer the second question, we discuss the relationship between classification and several key ethical issues arising from mitochondrial donation. We conclude that the properties characteristic of mitochondrial inheritance mean that most mitochondrial donation techniques belong to a new sub-class of genetic modification, which we call 'conditionally inheritable genomic modification' (CIGM).
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  ethics; gene therapy; genetic modification; germ-line; identity; mitochondrial disease; mitochondrial donation; mitochondrial replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27973716     DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  8 in total

1.  Assisted reproductive technologies to prevent human mitochondrial disease transmission.

Authors:  Andy Greenfield; Peter Braude; Frances Flinter; Robin Lovell-Badge; Caroline Ogilvie; Anthony C F Perry
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Are there moral differences between maternal spindle transfer and pronuclear transfer?

Authors:  César Palacios-González
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-12

3.  A 14-day limit for bioethics: the debate over human embryo research.

Authors:  Giulia Cavaliere
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Mitochondrial Modification Techniques and Ethical Issues.

Authors:  Lucía Gómez-Tatay; José M Hernández-Andreu; Justo Aznar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacement techniques: reproductive freedom and genetic kinship.

Authors:  Giulia Cavaliere; César Palacios-González
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.926

6.  Public attitudes towards novel reproductive technologies: a citizens' jury on mitochondrial donation.

Authors:  A J Newson; S de Lacey; D K Dowling; S Murray; C M Sue; D R Thorburn; L Gillam; C Degeling
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques, the Non-Identity Problem, and Genetic Parenthood.

Authors:  William Simkulet
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2021-05-08

8.  Does egg donation for mitochondrial replacement techniques generate parental responsibilities?

Authors:  César Palacios-González
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.926

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.