| Literature DB >> 27973356 |
Christof Holliger1, Madalena Alves2, Diana Andrade3, Irini Angelidaki4, Sergi Astals5, Urs Baier6, Claire Bougrier7, Pierre Buffière8, Marta Carballa9, Vinnie de Wilde10, Florian Ebertseder3, Belén Fernández11, Elena Ficara12, Ioannis Fotidis4, Jean-Claude Frigon13, Hélène Fruteau de Laclos14, Dara S M Ghasimi15, Gabrielle Hack1, Mathias Hartel3, Joern Heerenklage16, Ilona Sarvari Horvath17, Pavel Jenicek18, Konrad Koch19, Judith Krautwald6, Javier Lizasoain20, Jing Liu21, Lona Mosberger6, Mihaela Nistor21, Hans Oechsner22, João Vítor Oliveira2, Mark Paterson23, André Pauss24, Sébastien Pommier25, Isabella Porqueddu12, Francisco Raposo26, Thierry Ribeiro27, Florian Rüsch Pfund6, Sten Strömberg21, Michel Torrijos28, Miriam van Eekert29, Jules van Lier15, Harald Wedwitschka30, Isabella Wierinck31.
Abstract
Production of biogas from different organic materials is a most interesting source of renewable energy. The biomethane potential (BMP) of these materials has to be determined to get insight in design parameters for anaerobic digesters. Although several norms and guidelines for BMP tests exist, inter-laboratory tests regularly show high variability of BMPs for the same substrate. A workshop was held in June 2015, in Leysin, Switzerland, with over 40 attendees from 30 laboratories around the world, to agree on common solutions to the conundrum of inconsistent BMP test results. This paper presents the consensus of the intense roundtable discussions and cross-comparison of methodologies used in respective laboratories. Compulsory elements for the validation of BMP results were defined. They include the minimal number of replicates, the request to carry out blank and positive control assays, a criterion for the test duration, details on BMP calculation, and last but not least criteria for rejection of the BMP tests. Finally, recommendations on items that strongly influence the outcome of BMP tests such as inoculum characteristics, substrate preparation, test setup, and data analysis are presented to increase the probability of obtaining validated and reproducible results.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27973356 DOI: 10.2166/wst.2016.336
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Water Sci Technol ISSN: 0273-1223 Impact factor: 1.915