Literature DB >> 2796738

The cataphoric use of the indefinite this in spoken narratives.

M A Gernsbacher, S Shroyer.   

Abstract

Are concepts that were introduced with the unstressed, indefinite article this, as opposed to the indefinite a/an, more accessible from listeners' mental representations? Subjects heard and then verbally continued each of a series of informal narratives. The last clause of each narrative introduced a new noun phrase that began with either the indefinite this or the indefinite a/an (e.g., this egg or an egg). When the concepts were introduced with the indefinite this, the subjects referred to them more frequently, often within the first clauses that they produced, and typically via pronouns. In contrast, when the concepts were introduced with a/an, the subjects referred to them less frequently and typically via full noun phrases. Thus, concepts introduced with the indefinite this were more accessible; therefore, the indefinite this appears to operate cataphorically to improve referential access.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2796738      PMCID: PMC4301436          DOI: 10.3758/bf03197076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  4 in total

1.  Intonational marking of given and new information: some consequences for comprehension.

Authors:  J K Bock; J R Mazzella
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-01

2.  On the role of sentence stress in sentence processing.

Authors:  A Cutler; D J Foss
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1977 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; David J Hargreaves
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Mechanisms that improve referential access.

Authors:  M A Gernsbacher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-07
  4 in total
  14 in total

1.  Potato not Pope: human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences.

Authors:  Nicole Y Y Wicha; Elizabeth A Bates; Eva M Moreno; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Cataphoric devices in spoken discourse.

Authors:  M A Gernsbacher; J D Jescheniak
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading.

Authors:  R K Morris; J R Folk
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-11

4.  Investigating differences in general comprehension skill.

Authors:  M A Gernsbacher; K R Varner; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Accessibility in Text and Discourse Processing.

Authors:  Ted J M Sanders; Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Discourse Process       Date:  2004-04

6.  The role of suppression in figurative language comprehension.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gemsbacher; Rachel R W Robertson
Journal:  J Pragmat       Date:  1999-11-02

7.  How Automatically Do Readers Infer Fictional Characters' Emotional States?

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; Brenda M Hallada; Rachel R W Robertson
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  1998-07

8.  Two Decades of Structure Building.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Discourse Process       Date:  1997-01

9.  The Role of Suppression and Enhancement in Understanding Metaphors.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; Boaz Keysar; Rachel R W Robertson; Necia K Werner
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Disordered discourse in schizophrenia described by the Structure Building Framework.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; Kathleen A Tallent; Caroline M Bolliger
Journal:  Discourse Stud       Date:  1999-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.