Amanda C Freise1, Kirstin A Zettlitz1, Felix B Salazar1, Xiang Lu2,3, Richard Tavaré4,5, Anna M Wu6. 1. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of California, 570 Westwood Plaza, CNSI, PO Box 951770, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1770, USA. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Clinical Translational Science Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of California, 570 Westwood Plaza, CNSI, PO Box 951770, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1770, USA. richard.tavare@regeneron.com. 5. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, NY, 10951, USA. richard.tavare@regeneron.com. 6. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of California, 570 Westwood Plaza, CNSI, PO Box 951770, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1770, USA. awu@mednet.ucla.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Molecular imaging of CD4+ T cells throughout the body has implications for monitoring autoimmune disease and immunotherapy of cancer. Given the key role of these cells in regulating immunity, it is important to develop a biologically inert probe. GK1.5 cys-diabody (cDb), a previously developed anti-mouse CD4 antibody fragment, was tested at different doses to assess its effects on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and CD4+ T cell viability, proliferation, CD4 expression, and function. PROCEDURES: The effect of protein dose on image contrast (lymphoid tissue-to-muscle ratio) was assessed by administering different amounts of 89Zr-labeled GK1.5 cDb to mice followed by PET imaging and ex vivo biodistribution analysis. To assess impact of GK1.5 cDb on T cell biology, GK1.5 cDb was incubated with T cells in vitro or administered intravenously to C57BL/6 mice at multiple protein doses. CD4 expression and T cell proliferation were analyzed with flow cytometry and cytokines were assayed. RESULTS: For immunoPET imaging, the lowest protein dose of 2 μg of 89Zr-labeled GK1.5 cDb resulted in significantly higher % injected dose/g in inguinal lymph nodes (ILN) and spleen compared to the 12-μg protein dose. In vivo administration of GK1.5 cDb at the high dose of 40 μg caused a transient decrease in CD4 expression in spleen, blood, lymph nodes, and thymus, which recovered within 3 days postinjection; this effect was reduced, although not abrogated, when 2 μg was administered. Proliferation was inhibited in vivo in ILN but not the spleen by injection of 40 μg GK1.5 cDb. Concentrations of GK1.5 cDb in excess of 25 nM significantly inhibited CD4+ T cell proliferation and interferon-γ production in vitro. Overall, using low-dose GK1.5 cDb minimized biological effects on CD4+ T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose GK1.5 cDb yields high-contrast immunoPET images with minimal effects on T cell biology in vitro and in vivo and may be a useful tool for investigating CD4+ T cells in the context of preclinical disease models. Future approaches to minimizing biological effects may include the creation of monovalent fragments or selecting anti-CD4 antibodies which target alternative epitopes.
PURPOSE: Molecular imaging of CD4+ T cells throughout the body has implications for monitoring autoimmune disease and immunotherapy of cancer. Given the key role of these cells in regulating immunity, it is important to develop a biologically inert probe. GK1.5cys-diabody (cDb), a previously developed anti-mouseCD4 antibody fragment, was tested at different doses to assess its effects on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and CD4+ T cell viability, proliferation, CD4 expression, and function. PROCEDURES: The effect of protein dose on image contrast (lymphoid tissue-to-muscle ratio) was assessed by administering different amounts of 89Zr-labeled GK1.5cDb to mice followed by PET imaging and ex vivo biodistribution analysis. To assess impact of GK1.5cDb on T cell biology, GK1.5cDb was incubated with T cells in vitro or administered intravenously to C57BL/6 mice at multiple protein doses. CD4 expression and T cell proliferation were analyzed with flow cytometry and cytokines were assayed. RESULTS: For immunoPET imaging, the lowest protein dose of 2 μg of 89Zr-labeled GK1.5cDb resulted in significantly higher % injected dose/g in inguinal lymph nodes (ILN) and spleen compared to the 12-μg protein dose. In vivo administration of GK1.5cDb at the high dose of 40 μg caused a transient decrease in CD4 expression in spleen, blood, lymph nodes, and thymus, which recovered within 3 days postinjection; this effect was reduced, although not abrogated, when 2 μg was administered. Proliferation was inhibited in vivo in ILN but not the spleen by injection of 40 μg GK1.5cDb. Concentrations of GK1.5cDb in excess of 25 nM significantly inhibited CD4+ T cell proliferation and interferon-γ production in vitro. Overall, using low-dose GK1.5cDb minimized biological effects on CD4+ T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose GK1.5cDb yields high-contrast immunoPET images with minimal effects on T cell biology in vitro and in vivo and may be a useful tool for investigating CD4+ T cells in the context of preclinical disease models. Future approaches to minimizing biological effects may include the creation of monovalent fragments or selecting anti-CD4 antibodies which target alternative epitopes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Antibody engineering; CD4; Diabody; ImmunoPET; Lymphocytes; Positron emission tomography; T cell function; T cells; Zirconium-89
Authors: F Rödel; B Frey; U Gaipl; L Keilholz; C Fournier; K Manda; H Schöllnberger; G Hildebrandt; C Rödel Journal: Curr Med Chem Date: 2012 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Christoph M Griessinger; Andreas Maurer; Christian Kesenheimer; Rainer Kehlbach; Gerald Reischl; Walter Ehrlichmann; Daniel Bukala; Maren Harant; Funda Cay; Jürgen Brück; Renate Nordin; Ursula Kohlhofer; Hans-Georg Rammensee; Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez; Martin Schaller; Martin Röcken; Bernd J Pichler; Manfred Kneilling Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Noriko Sato; Haitao Wu; Kingsley O Asiedu; Lawrence P Szajek; Gary L Griffiths; Peter L Choyke Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-02-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Richard Tavaré; Helena Escuin-Ordinas; Stephen Mok; Melissa N McCracken; Kirstin A Zettlitz; Felix B Salazar; Owen N Witte; Antoni Ribas; Anna M Wu Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Bittoo Kanwar; Dong Wei Gao; Andrew B Hwang; James P Grenert; Simon P Williams; Benjamin Franc; Joseph M McCune Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2007-10-16 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Michele Di Mascio; Chang H Paik; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Jin-Soo Maeng; Beom-Su Jang; In Soo Shin; Sharat Srinivasula; Russ Byrum; Achilles Neria; William Kopp; Marta Catalfamo; Yoshiaki Nishimura; Keith Reimann; Malcolm Martin; H Clifford Lane Journal: Blood Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Israt S Alam; Federico Simonetta; Lukas Scheller; Aaron T Mayer; Robert Negrin; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Surya Murty; Ophir Vermesh; Tomomi W Nobashi; Juliane K Lohmeyer; Toshihito Hirai; Jeanette Baker; Kenneth H Lau Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Amanda C Freise; Kirstin A Zettlitz; Felix B Salazar; Richard Tavaré; Wen-Ting K Tsai; Arion F Chatziioannou; Nora Rozengurt; Jonathan Braun; Anna M Wu Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jordan M White; Outi M Keinänen; Brendon E Cook; Brian M Zeglis; Heather M Gibson; Nerissa T Viola Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Michele Di Mascio; Sharat Srinivasula; Insook Kim; Gorka Duralde; Alexis St Claire; Paula DeGrange; Marisa St Claire; Keith A Reimann; Erin E Gabriel; Jorge Carrasquillo; Richard C Reba; Chang Paik; Henry C Lane Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-07-12