Peter D Gibson1, Garret L Sobol2, Irfan H Ahmed2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ. Electronic address: peterdgibson@gmail.com. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The repair of zone II flexor tendon injuries is an evolving topic in hand surgery with current literature suggesting the use of a 4-strand repair; 3-0 or 4-0 braided, nonabsorbable sutures; and an epitendinous repair. It was hypothesized that variability would exist within the hand surgeon community in treatment of zone II flexor tendon repairs in surgical material used, surgical technique, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol. METHODS: An online single-answer multiple-choice survey was distributed to the American Society for Surgery of the Hand members' database. Surgeons were asked questions about demographics, surgical technique, suture type, common complications, postoperative management, and the factor that plays the largest role in guiding their surgical preferences. Responses were compared with current medical evidence. RESULTS: A total of 410 individuals responded to the survey. In regards to technique, the majority of surgeons reported using a 4-strand repair; with 3-0 or 4-0 core braided, nonabsorbable sutures; and performing an epitendinous repair. Only 20% of surgeons surveyed reported ever using wide-awake local anesthesia, no tourniquet and postoperative protocols were split between early active and early passive rehabilitation. Senior surgeons (≥ 15 years in practice) were more likely than their colleagues to use a 2-strand repair and a passive rehabilitation protocol. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the majority of respondents are performing zone II flexor tendon repairs in accordance with the best currently available evidence, although there is variability with respect to suture material, surgical technique, and rehabilitation protocols. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There is still a need for high-quality studies on surgical technique and rehabilitation protocols.
PURPOSE: The repair of zone II flexor tendon injuries is an evolving topic in hand surgery with current literature suggesting the use of a 4-strand repair; 3-0 or 4-0 braided, nonabsorbable sutures; and an epitendinous repair. It was hypothesized that variability would exist within the hand surgeon community in treatment of zone II flexor tendon repairs in surgical material used, surgical technique, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol. METHODS: An online single-answer multiple-choice survey was distributed to the American Society for Surgery of the Hand members' database. Surgeons were asked questions about demographics, surgical technique, suture type, common complications, postoperative management, and the factor that plays the largest role in guiding their surgical preferences. Responses were compared with current medical evidence. RESULTS: A total of 410 individuals responded to the survey. In regards to technique, the majority of surgeons reported using a 4-strand repair; with 3-0 or 4-0 core braided, nonabsorbable sutures; and performing an epitendinous repair. Only 20% of surgeons surveyed reported ever using wide-awake local anesthesia, no tourniquet and postoperative protocols were split between early active and early passive rehabilitation. Senior surgeons (≥ 15 years in practice) were more likely than their colleagues to use a 2-strand repair and a passive rehabilitation protocol. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the majority of respondents are performing zone II flexor tendon repairs in accordance with the best currently available evidence, although there is variability with respect to suture material, surgical technique, and rehabilitation protocols. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There is still a need for high-quality studies on surgical technique and rehabilitation protocols.
Authors: Özgün Barış Güntürk; Murat Kayalar; İbrahim Kaplan; Abuzer Uludağ; Kemal Özaksar; Beray Keleşoğlu Journal: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 1.511