Linda Drijvers1, Asli Özyürek2. 1. Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 2. Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated whether and to what extent iconic co-speech gestures contribute to information from visible speech to enhance degraded speech comprehension at different levels of noise-vocoding. Previous studies of the contributions of these 2 visual articulators to speech comprehension have only been performed separately. Method: Twenty participants watched videos of an actress uttering an action verb and completed a free-recall task. The videos were presented in 3 speech conditions (2-band noise-vocoding, 6-band noise-vocoding, clear), 3 multimodal conditions (speech + lips blurred, speech + visible speech, speech + visible speech + gesture), and 2 visual-only conditions (visible speech, visible speech + gesture). Results: Accuracy levels were higher when both visual articulators were present compared with 1 or none. The enhancement effects of (a) visible speech, (b) gestural information on top of visible speech, and (c) both visible speech and iconic gestures were larger in 6-band than 2-band noise-vocoding or visual-only conditions. Gestural enhancement in 2-band noise-vocoding did not differ from gestural enhancement in visual-only conditions. Conclusions: When perceiving degraded speech in a visual context, listeners benefit more from having both visual articulators present compared with 1. This benefit was larger at 6-band than 2-band noise-vocoding, where listeners can benefit from both phonological cues from visible speech and semantic cues from iconic gestures to disambiguate speech.
Purpose: This study investigated whether and to what extent iconic co-speech gestures contribute to information from visible speech to enhance degraded speech comprehension at different levels of noise-vocoding. Previous studies of the contributions of these 2 visual articulators to speech comprehension have only been performed separately. Method: Twenty participants watched videos of an actress uttering an action verb and completed a free-recall task. The videos were presented in 3 speech conditions (2-band noise-vocoding, 6-band noise-vocoding, clear), 3 multimodal conditions (speech + lips blurred, speech + visible speech, speech + visible speech + gesture), and 2 visual-only conditions (visible speech, visible speech + gesture). Results: Accuracy levels were higher when both visual articulators were present compared with 1 or none. The enhancement effects of (a) visible speech, (b) gestural information on top of visible speech, and (c) both visible speech and iconic gestures were larger in 6-band than 2-band noise-vocoding or visual-only conditions. Gestural enhancement in 2-band noise-vocoding did not differ from gestural enhancement in visual-only conditions. Conclusions: When perceiving degraded speech in a visual context, listeners benefit more from having both visual articulators present compared with 1. This benefit was larger at 6-band than 2-band noise-vocoding, where listeners can benefit from both phonological cues from visible speech and semantic cues from iconic gestures to disambiguate speech.
Authors: Logan S James; A Leonie Baier; Rachel A Page; Paul Clements; Kimberly L Hunter; Ryan C Taylor; Michael J Ryan Journal: Biol Lett Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 3.812
Authors: Eva Gutierrez-Sigut; Veronica M Lamarche; Katherine Rowley; Emilio Ferreiro Lago; María Jesús Pardo-Guijarro; Ixone Saenz; Berta Frigola; Santiago Frigola; Delfina Aliaga; Laura Goldberg Journal: Cogn Res Princ Implic Date: 2022-09-05
Authors: Ye Zhang; Diego Frassinelli; Jyrki Tuomainen; Jeremy I Skipper; Gabriella Vigliocco Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 5.349