Literature DB >> 27959712

Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.

David P Taggart1, Douglas G Altman1, Alastair M Gray1, Belinda Lees1, Stephen Gerry1, Umberto Benedetto1, Marcus Flather1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of bilateral internal thoracic (mammary) arteries for coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) may improve long-term outcomes as compared with the use of a single internal-thoracic-artery plus vein grafts.
METHODS: We randomly assigned patients scheduled for CABG to undergo single or bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting in 28 cardiac surgical centers in seven countries. The primary outcome was death from any cause at 10 years. The composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke was a secondary outcome. Interim analyses were prespecified at 5 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 3102 patients were enrolled; 1554 were randomly assigned to undergo single internal-thoracic-artery grafting (the single-graft group) and 1548 to undergo bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting (the bilateral-graft group). At 5 years of follow-up, the rate of death was 8.7% in the bilateral-graft group and 8.4% in the single-graft group (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.32; P=0.77), and the rate of the composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke was 12.2% and 12.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.17; P=0.69). The rate of sternal wound complication was 3.5% in the bilateral-graft group versus 1.9% in the single-graft group (P=0.005), and the rate of sternal reconstruction was 1.9% versus 0.6% (P=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing CABG, there was no significant difference between those receiving single internal-thoracic-artery grafts and those receiving bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafts with regard to mortality or the rates of cardiovascular events at 5 years of follow-up. There were more sternal wound complications with bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting than with single internal-thoracic-artery grafting. Ten-year follow-up is ongoing. (Funded by the British Heart Foundation and others; ART Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN46552265 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27959712     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  69 in total

1.  Bilateral Versus Single Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafting: Do We Have the Answer?

Authors:  Frank W Sellke
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Optimal use of arterial grafts during current coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Suzuki Tomoaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  The risk of mediastinitis and deep sternal wound infections with single and bilateral, pedicled and skeletonized internal thoracic arteries.

Authors:  Harold L Lazar
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-09

Review 4.  How I deploy arterial grafts.

Authors:  David P Taggart
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-09

Review 5.  Cardiac surgery 2016 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Yasin Essa; Khalil Jacoub; Alexandros Moschovas; David Gonzalez-Lopez; Hristo Kirov; Mahmoud Diab; Steffen Bargenda; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Cardiac surgery 2017 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Hristo Kirov; Alexandros Moschovas; David Gonzalez-Lopez; Rauf Safarov; Mahmoud Diab; Steffen Bargenda; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  No-touch saphenous vein as an important conduit of choice in coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  Tomislav Kopjar; Michael Richard Dashwood; Mats Dreifaldt; Domingos Ramos de Souza
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Improved outcome of bilateral compared to single internal thoracic artery grafting: patient's selection or technical skill?

Authors:  Antonio M Calafiore; Carlo Maria De Filippo; Massimiliano Foschi; Michele Di Mauro
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-05

9.  Untangling the bilateral versus single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting debate.

Authors:  Emile Voisine; Pierre Voisine
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-05

10.  Multiple arterial, minimally invasive coronary surgery (MA-MICS).

Authors:  David R Hobson; Kevin W Lobdell; Joseph T McGinn
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.