| Literature DB >> 27957408 |
Jamila Djafari1, Catarina Marinho2, Tiago Santos2, Gilberto Igrejas3, Carmen Torres4, José Luis Capelo1, Patricia Poeta5, Carlos Lodeiro1, Javier Fernández-Lodeiro1.
Abstract
A new synthetic methodology of water-soluble gold and silver nanoparticles (AuNPs@TC and AgNPs@TC), using the antibiotic tetracycline (TC) as co-reducing and stabilizing agent, is reported. Both colloids exhibit high water stability. The average sizes obtained were 25±10 and 15±5 nm, respectively. Both composites were tested against TC-resistant bacteria, presenting an increasing antibacterial effect in the case of AgNPs@TC. The sensing towards metal ions was also explored. An interesting and reversible affinity of AuNPs@TC towards AlIII cations in an aqueous system was also observed.Entities:
Keywords: aluminum detection; antimicrobial studies; gold and silver nanoparticles; nanoantibiotics; nanochemical sensor
Year: 2016 PMID: 27957408 PMCID: PMC5130297 DOI: 10.1002/open.201600016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ChemistryOpen ISSN: 2191-1363 Impact factor: 2.911
Figure 1UV/Vis absorption spectra, color solution, histogram, and TEM images of AgNPs@TC (a), AuNPs@TC (b), and AgNPs@TC‐2 (c).
Figure 2UV/Vis absorption spectra, Z potential and color solution of AgNPs@TC (a) and AuNPs@TC (b) as a function of pH (pH between 2 and 11).
Figure 3Spectrophotometric titration of AuNPs@TC with the addition of increasing amounts of Al(NO3)3 and naked‐eye detection (a). Reversible colorimetric change upon addition of EDTA in aqueous solution and TEM images of AuNPs@TC with the addition of 500 nm of Al(NO3)3 (b).
Scheme 1Illustrative representation of reversible naked‐eye sensing of AuNPs@TC towards Al3+.
Antimicrobial effect of NPs functionalized with TC, on TC‐susceptible and ‐resistant E. coli and S. aureus strains. (S‐susceptible to TC; R‐resistant to TC; ND‐not determined).
| NP sample | Strain | MIC [μg mL−1] | MBC [μg mL−1] | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AuNPs@TC |
| 6 | ND | 6.8 |
|
| ND | ND | 6.8 | |
|
| 16 | ND | 6.6 | |
|
| ND | ND | 6.6 | |
| AgNPs@TC |
| 16 | 20 | 6.8 |
|
| 25 | 35.5 | 6.8 | |
|
| 16 | 35.5 | 6.8 | |
|
| ND | ND | 7.0 | |
| AgNPs@TC‐2 |
| 32 | 32 | 7.2 |
|
| 40 | 40 | 6.8 | |
|
| 32 | 40 | 7.0 | |
|
| 62.3 | ND | 6.8 | |
| TC |
| 0.5 | 16 | 6.4 |
|
| 128 | 256 | 6.0 | |
|
| 8 | 128 | 6.8 | |
|
| 64 | 256 | 6.0 | |
| AgNPs 15 nm |
| 30 | 50 | ND |
|
| 90 | 110 | ND | |
|
| 100 | 110 | ND |
Bacterial strains used in this study.
| Strain | Relevant phenotype[a] | Reference |
|---|---|---|
|
| Non‐pathogenic, Gram negative; Tets | ATCC |
|
| Pathogenic, Gram negative; Tetr |
|
|
| Gram positive; Tets | ATCC |
|
| Pathogenic, Gram positive; Tetr |
|
[a] Tets, TC sensitive; Tetr, resistant to TC.