Paula C Vincent1, R Lorraine Collins2, Liu Liu3, Jihnhee Yu3, Joseph A De Leo4, Mitch Earleywine4. 1. Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. 2. Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. Electronic address: lcollins@buffalo.edu. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo NY 14214, USA. 4. Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12222, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Given the growing legalization of recreational marijuana use and related increase in its prevalence in the United States, it is important to understand marijuana's appeal. We used a behavioral economic (BE) approach to examine whether the reinforcing properties of marijuana, including "demand" for marijuana, varied as a function of its perceived quality. METHODS: Using an innovative, Web-based marijuana purchase task (MPT), a sample of 683 young-adult recreational marijuana users made hypothetical purchases of marijuana across three qualities (low, mid and high grade) at nine escalating prices per joint, ranging from $0/free to $20. RESULTS: We used nonlinear mixed effects modeling to conduct demand curve analyses, which produced separate demand indices (e.g., Pmax, elasticity) for each grade of marijuana. Consistent with previous research, as the price of marijuana increased, marijuana users reduced their purchasing. Demand also was sensitive to quality, with users willing to pay more for higher quality/grade marijuana. In regression analyses, demand indices accounted for significant variance in typical marijuana use. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the value of applying BE theory to young adult marijuana use. It extends past research by examining how perceived quality affects demand for marijuana and provides support for the validity of a Web-based MPT to examine the appeal of marijuana. Our results have implications for policies to regulate marijuana use, including taxation based on the quality of different marijuana products.
BACKGROUND: Given the growing legalization of recreational marijuana use and related increase in its prevalence in the United States, it is important to understand marijuana's appeal. We used a behavioral economic (BE) approach to examine whether the reinforcing properties of marijuana, including "demand" for marijuana, varied as a function of its perceived quality. METHODS: Using an innovative, Web-based marijuana purchase task (MPT), a sample of 683 young-adult recreational marijuana users made hypothetical purchases of marijuana across three qualities (low, mid and high grade) at nine escalating prices per joint, ranging from $0/free to $20. RESULTS: We used nonlinear mixed effects modeling to conduct demand curve analyses, which produced separate demand indices (e.g., Pmax, elasticity) for each grade of marijuana. Consistent with previous research, as the price of marijuana increased, marijuana users reduced their purchasing. Demand also was sensitive to quality, with users willing to pay more for higher quality/grade marijuana. In regression analyses, demand indices accounted for significant variance in typical marijuana use. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the value of applying BE theory to young adult marijuana use. It extends past research by examining how perceived quality affects demand for marijuana and provides support for the validity of a Web-based MPT to examine the appeal of marijuana. Our results have implications for policies to regulate marijuana use, including taxation based on the quality of different marijuana products.
Authors: Ali M Yurasek; James G Murphy; Ashley A Dennhardt; Jessica R Skidmore; Joanna Buscemi; Claudia McCausland; Matthew P Martens Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: James MacKillop; Robert Miranda; Peter M Monti; Lara A Ray; James G Murphy; Damaris J Rohsenow; John E McGeary; Robert M Swift; Jennifer W Tidey; Chad J Gwaltney Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2010-02
Authors: Warren K Bickel; Matthew W Johnson; Mikhail N Koffarnus; James MacKillop; James G Murphy Journal: Annu Rev Clin Psychol Date: 2014 Impact factor: 18.561
Authors: James G Murphy; James MacKillop; Jennifer W Tidey; Linda A Brazil; Suzanne M Colby Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Ivori Zvorsky; Tyler D Nighbor; Allison N Kurti; Michael DeSarno; Gideon Naudé; Derek D Reed; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Elizabeth R Aston; Jane Metrik; Rochelle K Rosen; Robert Swift; James MacKillop Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Mark A Prince; Tiffany Jenzer; Whitney Brown; Eleftherios M Hetelekides; Rachel A Mumm; R Lorraine Collins Journal: Drugs Alcohol Today Date: 2019-03-06