Literature DB >> 2794867

Temporal specificity of fear conditioning: effects of different conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus intervals on the fear-potentiated startle effect.

M Davis1, L S Schlesinger, C A Sorenson.   

Abstract

Separate groups of rats were given 30 pairings of a light (conditioned stimulus, CS) and 500-ms shock (unconditioned stimulus, US) at CS-US intervals of 0, 25, 50, 100, 200, 800, 3,200, 12,800, or 51,200 ms. Other groups had lights and shocks inconsistently paired. The startle reflex was elicited 2-4 days later with a noise burst alone or 25-51,200 ms after light onset. After CS-US pairings over a wide range of intervals (25-51,200 ms), startle was potentiated in testing, sometimes as rapidly as 50 ms after light onset. Magnitude of potentiation and resistance to extinction were generally greater with longer CS-US intervals. In several groups, potentiation was maximal at a test interval that matched the CS-US interval used in training. This temporal specificity sharpened with increasing numbers of training trials but even occurred with a single training trial in which a 51,200-ms CS-US interval was used. The data indicate that even during simple fear conditioning, animals rapidly learn a temporal CS-US relationship. This has important implications for understanding the neural mechanisms of fear conditioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2794867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  46 in total

1.  AX+, BX- discrimination learning in the fear-potentiated startle paradigm: possible relevance to inhibitory fear learning in extinction.

Authors:  Karyn M Myers; Michael Davis
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Timing of fear expression in trace and delay conditioning measured by fear-potentiated startle in rats.

Authors:  Michael A Burman; Jonathan C Gewirtz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Forebrain-Cerebellar Interactions During Learning.

Authors:  Craig Weiss; Aldis P Weible; Roberto Galvez; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Cellscience       Date:  2006-10-27

4.  A model of interval timing by neural integration.

Authors:  Patrick Simen; Fuat Balci; Laura de Souza; Jonathan D Cohen; Philip Holmes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The GABA(B) receptor positive modulator BHF177 attenuated anxiety, but not conditioned fear, in rats.

Authors:  Xia Li; Katarzyna Kaczanowska; M G Finn; Athina Markou; Victoria B Risbrough
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Neural mechanisms of human temporal fear conditioning.

Authors:  Nathaniel G Harnett; Joshua R Shumen; Pooja A Wagle; Kimberly H Wood; Muriah D Wheelock; James H Baños; David C Knight
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Single-unit firing in rat perirhinal cortex caused by fear conditioning to arbitrary and ecological stimuli.

Authors:  Sharon C Furtak; Timothy A Allen; Thomas H Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Acquisition of peak responding: what is learned?

Authors:  Fuat Balci; Charles R Gallistel; Brian D Allen; Krystal M Frank; Jacqueline M Gibson; Daniela Brunner
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Detection of a temporal error triggers reconsolidation of amygdala-dependent memories.

Authors:  Lorenzo Díaz-Mataix; Raquel Chacon Ruiz Martinez; Glenn E Schafe; Joseph E LeDoux; Valérie Doyère
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Explaining compound generalization in associative and causal learning through rational principles of dimensional generalization.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Samuel J Gershman; Yael Niv
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.