Literature DB >> 2794318

Effects of age, education, and physician advice on utilization of screening mammography.

P P Coll1, P J O'Connor, B F Crabtree, R W Besdine.   

Abstract

We investigated the utilization of mammography as a screening test for breast cancer in a middle-income Connecticut suburban community of 30,000 people. The sampling frame was community-dwelling women aged 30 years and over who had telephones. Random digit telephone survey methods were used to identify a sample of 470 eligible subjects. Of those eligible to be included, 350 or 74.4% completed the interview. Analysis of data from the 171 respondents aged 50 years or greater indicated that women aged 65-80 years had a significantly lower rate of screening mammography than did women aged 50-64 years (means 2 = 6.6, P = .01). When further analysis was done to take into account the effects of education and of income on these rates, the association of age with mammography utilization was no longer statistically significant. Among women who recalled their physician advising a mammogram, 88% had had one performed. Among women who could not recall their physician advising a mammogram, 7% had had one. The impact of physician advice was statistically significant (means 2 = 110.3, P less than .001). Physicians recommended screening mammography less for patients with low level of education (means 2 = 21.6, P less than .001), low income (X2 = 7.8, df = 2, P = .02) and greater age (means 2 = 14.2, P = .003). We conclude that utilization of screening mammography in the community studied is related more strongly to education and to income than to age. The bivariate association of mammography utilization with age may be attributable to a cohort effect, rather than an age effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2794318     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb07281.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  13 in total

1.  The effect of Medicare reimbursement for screening mammography on utilization and payment. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.

Authors:  N Breen; E J Feuer; S Depuy; J Zapka
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Mammography in a health maintenance organization.

Authors:  J P Hansen; P A Knapp; P A Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Redesigning primary care processes to improve the offering of mammography. The use of clinic protocols by nonphysicians.

Authors:  B D McCarthy; M U Yood; M B Bolton; E A Boohaker; C H MacWilliam; M J Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Breast cancer control among the underserved--an overview.

Authors:  N Breen; L G Kessler; M L Brown
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Recruiting women for breast screening. Family Physician Model strategy.

Authors:  R G McAuley; C Rand; M Levine
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Benefits of collecting local data on breast cancer and mammography practices in northwestern Pennsylvania.

Authors:  S A Norman; G B Weinberg; B R Krampe; E T Finnegan
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Attitudes of African Americans regarding screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  S B Robinson; M Ashley; M A Haynes
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Female patients' attitudes to mammography screening.

Authors:  J A Hammond; M Stewart
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  N Breen; L Kessler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Physicians' recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference?

Authors:  C S Skinner; V J Strecher; H Hospers
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.