Literature DB >> 27943059

Intimate partner violence and women's cancer quality of life.

Ann L Coker1,2, Diane R Follingstad3, Lisandra S Garcia4, Heather M Bush3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Because intimate partner violence (IPV) may disproportionately impact women's quality of life (QOL) when undergoing cancer treatment, women experiencing IPV were hypothesized to have (a) more symptoms of depression or stress and (b) lower QOL as measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-B) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being (FACIT-SP) Scales relative to those never experiencing IPV.
METHODS: Women, aged 18-79, who were included in one of two state cancer registries from 2009 to 2015 with a recent incident, primary, invasive biopsy-confirmed cancer diagnosis were recruited and asked to complete a phone interview, within 12 months of diagnosis. This interview measured IPV by timing (current and past) and type (physical, sexual, psychological), socio-demographics, and health status. Cancer registries provided consenting women's cancer stage, site, date of diagnosis, and age.
RESULTS: In this large cohort of 3,278 women who completed a phone interview, 1,221 (37.3%) disclosed lifetime IPV (10.6% sexual, 24.5% physical, and 33.6% psychological IPV). Experiencing IPV (particularly current IPV) was associated with poorer cancer-related QOL defined as having more symptoms of depression and stress after cancer diagnosis and lower FACIT-SP and FACT scores than women not experiencing IPV and controlling for confounders including demographic factors, cancer stage, site, and number of comorbid conditions. Current IPV was more strongly associated with poorer QOL. When compared with those experiencing past IPV (and no IPV), women with cancer who experienced current IPV had significantly higher depression and stress symptoms scores and lower FACIT-SP and FACT-G scores indicating poorer QOL for all domains. While IPV was not associated with being diagnosed at a later cancer stage, current IPV was significantly associated with having more than one comorbid physical conditions at interview (adjusted rate ratio = 1.35; 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.54) and particularly for women diagnosed with cancer when <55 years of age.
CONCLUSIONS: Current and past IPV were associated with poorer mental and physical health functioning among women recently diagnosed with cancer. Including clinical IPV screening may improve women's cancer-related QOL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer registries; Epidemiology; Partner violence; Quality of life (QOL); Spouse abuse; Survivorship

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27943059      PMCID: PMC5224925          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-016-0833-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  32 in total

1.  Intimate partner violence and cancer screening among urban minority women.

Authors:  Sheetal Gandhi; Sue Rovi; Marielos Vega; Mark S Johnson; Jeanne Ferrante; Ping-Hsin Chen
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Secondary prevention of intimate partner violence: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Judith M McFarlane; Janet Y Groff; Jennifer A O'Brien; Kathy Watson
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Adverse impact of a history of violence for women with breast, cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Susan C Modesitt; Alisa C Gambrell; Hope M Cottrill; Lon R Hays; Robert Walker; Brent J Shelton; Carol E Jordan; James E Ferguson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

5.  Factors Mediating the Relationship Between Intimate Partner Violence and Cervical Cancer Among Thai Women.

Authors:  Nanthana Thananowan; Nopporn Vongsirimas
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2014-11-06

Review 6.  Intimate Partner Violence Among Women Diagnosed With Cancer.

Authors:  Wendy A Johnson; Huibrie C Pieters
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  Preventive healthcare use, smoking, and alcohol use among Rhode Island women experiencing intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Stephenie C Lemon; Wendy Verhoek-Oftedahl; Edward F Donnelly
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

8.  Linking cancer and intimate partner violence: the importance of screening women in the oncology setting.

Authors:  Sandra K Cesario; Judith McFarlane; Angeles Nava; Heidi Gilroy; John Maddoux
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.027

Review 9.  Intimate partner violence screening tools: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca F Rabin; Jacky M Jennings; Jacquelyn C Campbell; Megan H Bair-Merritt
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Inadequate cervical cancer screening among mid-aged Australian women who have experienced partner violence.

Authors:  Deborah Loxton; Jennifer Powers; Margot Schofield; Rafat Hussain; Stacey Hosking
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  2 in total

1.  Stressful life events, intimate partner violence, and perceived stress in the postpartum period: longitudinal findings in rural Pakistan.

Authors:  Sarah C Haight; John A Gallis; Esther O Chung; Victoria Baranov; Amina Bibi; Allison Frost; Ashley Hagaman; Siham Sikander; Joanna Maselko; Lisa M Bates
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.519

2.  Disparities in women's cancer-related quality of life by Southern Appalachian residence.

Authors:  Ann L Coker; Huong T Luu; Heather M Bush
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 4.147

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.