Jason D Robarge1, Zereunesay Desta1, Anne T Nguyen1, Lang Li2, Daniel Hertz3, James M Rae3, Daniel F Hayes3, Anna M Storniolo4, Vered Stearns5, David A Flockhart1, Todd C Skaar1, N Lynn Henry6. 1. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 2. Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 3. Breast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 5. Breast Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 6. Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr #3362, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. lynn.henry@hci.utah.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Inter-individual differences in estrogen concentrations during treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) may contribute to therapeutic response and toxicity. The aim of this study was to determine plasma concentrations of estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), and estrone sulfate (E1S) in a large cohort of AI-treated breast cancer patients. METHODS: In a randomized, multicenter trial of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer starting treatment withletrozole (n = 241) or exemestane (n = 228), plasma estrogen concentrations at baseline and after 3 months were quantitated using a sensitive mass spectrometry-based assay. Concentrations and suppression below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were compared between estrogens and between drugs. RESULTS: The ranges of baseline estrogen concentrations were <LLOQ-361 pg/mL for E2, <LLOQ-190 pg/mL for E1, and 8.3-4060 pg/mL for E1S. For E2, the frequency of suppression below the LLOQ was not statistically significantly different between AIs (exemestane: 89.0%, letrozole: 86.9%, p = 0.51). However, patients on letrozole were more likely to achieve suppression below the LLOQ of both E1 (exemestane: 80.1%, letrozole: 90.1%, p = 0.005) and E1S (exemestane: 17.4%, letrozole: 54.9%, p = 4.34e-15). After 3 months of AI therapy, the ranges of estrogen concentrations were <LLOQ-63.8 pg/mL, <LLOQ-36.7 pg/mL, and <LLOQ-1090 pg/mL for E2, E1, and E1S, respectively. During treatment, 16 patients had an increased concentration compared to the baseline concentration of at least one estrogen. CONCLUSIONS:Letrozole had greater suppression of plasma E1 and E1S than exemestane, though the response was highly variable among patients. Additional research is required to examine the clinical relevance of differential estrogen suppression.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Inter-individual differences in estrogen concentrations during treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) may contribute to therapeutic response and toxicity. The aim of this study was to determine plasma concentrations of estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), and estrone sulfate (E1S) in a large cohort of AI-treated breast cancerpatients. METHODS: In a randomized, multicenter trial of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer starting treatment with letrozole (n = 241) or exemestane (n = 228), plasma estrogen concentrations at baseline and after 3 months were quantitated using a sensitive mass spectrometry-based assay. Concentrations and suppression below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were compared between estrogens and between drugs. RESULTS: The ranges of baseline estrogen concentrations were <LLOQ-361 pg/mL for E2, <LLOQ-190 pg/mL for E1, and 8.3-4060 pg/mL for E1S. For E2, the frequency of suppression below the LLOQ was not statistically significantly different between AIs (exemestane: 89.0%, letrozole: 86.9%, p = 0.51). However, patients on letrozole were more likely to achieve suppression below the LLOQ of both E1 (exemestane: 80.1%, letrozole: 90.1%, p = 0.005) and E1S (exemestane: 17.4%, letrozole: 54.9%, p = 4.34e-15). After 3 months of AI therapy, the ranges of estrogen concentrations were <LLOQ-63.8 pg/mL, <LLOQ-36.7 pg/mL, and <LLOQ-1090 pg/mL for E2, E1, and E1S, respectively. During treatment, 16 patients had an increased concentration compared to the baseline concentration of at least one estrogen. CONCLUSIONS:Letrozole had greater suppression of plasma E1 and E1S than exemestane, though the response was highly variable among patients. Additional research is required to examine the clinical relevance of differential estrogen suppression.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Estradiol; Estrone; Estrone sulfate; Exemestane; Letrozole
Authors: Ian E Smith; Mitch Dowsett; Yoon-Sim Yap; Geraldine Walsh; Per E Lønning; Richard J Santen; Daniel Hayes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Richard J Santen; Lawrence Demers; Susan Ohorodnik; J Settlage; Peter Langecker; D Blanchett; Paul E Goss; Shuping Wang Journal: Steroids Date: 2007-05-21 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: William Rosner; Susan E Hankinson; Patrick M Sluss; Hubert W Vesper; Margaret E Wierman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: V Sini; G Lunardi; M Cirillo; M Turazza; C Bighin; S Giraudi; A Levaggi; P Piccioli; G Bisagni; R Gnoni; G Stridi; M Porpiglia; E Picardo; R Ponzone; D Marenco; M Mansutti; F Puglisi; L Del Mastro Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Jacqueline M Dempsey; Kelley M Kidwell; Christina L Gersch; Andrea M Pesch; Zeruesenay Desta; Anna Maria Storniolo; Vered Stearns; Todd C Skaar; Daniel F Hayes; N Lynn Henry; James M Rae; Daniel L Hertz Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Kunal C Kadakia; Kelley M Kidwell; Nicholas J Seewald; Claire F Snyder; Anna Maria Storniolo; Julie L Otte; David A Flockhart; Daniel F Hayes; Vered Stearns; N Lynn Henry Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Daniel L Hertz; Kelly A Speth; Kelley M Kidwell; Christina L Gersch; Zeruesenay Desta; Anna Maria Storniolo; Vered Stearns; Todd C Skaar; Daniel F Hayes; N Lynn Henry; James M Rae Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Miguel Quintela-Fandino; Juan V Apala; Diego Malon; Silvana Mouron; Javier Hornedo; Lucia Gonzalez-Cortijo; Ramon Colomer; Juan Guerra Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 6.466