Literature DB >> 25706605

Self-control behaviors during the learning of a cascade juggling task.

David D Laughlin1, Jeffrey T Fairbrother2, Craig A Wrisberg3, Arya Alami4, Leslee A Fisher5, Schuyler W Huck6.   

Abstract

This study examined the self-control behaviors of participants learning a 3-ball cascade juggle. Participants chose when they would receive one of four types of instructional assistance: (a) instructions; (b) video demonstration; (c) knowledge of performance (KP); and (d) knowledge of results (KR). Juggling proficiency was divided into three categories based on catches per attempt during retention and transfer testing. In general, participants decreased their requests for instructions and video demonstration throughout acquisition. For the most proficient performers, requests for KR increased over practice. Post-experimental interviews revealed that participants requested KR after primarily good attempts and KP after both good and bad attempts. Participant-reported reasons for requesting feedback included the confirmation of success (KR) and identification of technique flaws (KP). Overall, the findings suggest that self-control behaviors are more complex than previously demonstrated and that participants use self-control differently depending upon the type of assistance available, individual preferences, and learning needs.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feedback; Knowledge of results; Motor processes; Perceptual motor learning; Self control; Self regulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25706605     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  4 in total

1.  An interpolated activity during the knowledge-of-results delay interval eliminates the learning advantages of self-controlled feedback schedules.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-18

2.  Exercising choice over feedback schedules during practice is not advantageous for motor learning.

Authors:  Laura St Germain; Brad McKay; Andrew Poskus; Allison Williams; Olena Leshchyshen; Sherry Feldman; Joshua G A Cashaback; Michael J Carter
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-09-26

3.  Relatedness support enhances motor learning.

Authors:  Daniela H Gonzalez; Suzete Chiviacowsky
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-12-10

4.  Self-Control of Haptic Assistance for Motor Learning: Influences of Frequency and Opinion of Utility.

Authors:  Camille K Williams; Victrine Tseung; Heather Carnahan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.