Literature DB >> 27942557

Data on the quantitative assessment pulmonary ground-glass opacification from coronary computed tomography angiography datasets.

J Tobias Kühl1, Thomas S Kristensen2, Anna F Thomsen1, Louise Hindsø1, Kristoffer L Hansen2, Olav W Nielsen3, Henning Kelbæk4, Klaus F Kofoed5.   

Abstract

We assessed the CT attenuation density of the pulmonary tissue adjacent to the heart in patients with acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (J.T. Kuhl, T.S. Kristensen, A.F. Thomsen et al., 2016) [1]. This data was related to the level of ground-glass opacification evaluated by a radiologist, and data on the interobserver variability of semi-automated assessment of pulmonary attenuation density was provided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac computed tomography angiography; Lung water; Pulmonary congestion

Year:  2016        PMID: 27942557      PMCID: PMC5133651          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data The data can be used to evaluate inter-observer variability of semi-automated assessment of lung water assessed on cardiac computed tomography data sets. This data can be used to evaluate the relation between subjective assessment of ground-glass opacification and pulmonary attenuation density. These data on high attenuation density volume in patients with myocardial infarction can be used in further studies to compare values with other cohorts.

Data

The visual severity of three levels of ground-glass opacification (GGO) is related to pulmonary attenuation densities. Further the interobserver variability of these automated measurements are presented.

Interobserver variability

Automated segmentation of the lungs was performed by two independent observers in 53 patients; 27 with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45% and 26 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <45%. No significant difference between observers was found in the measurement of pulmonary attenuation density: mean difference 4 HU (95% CI of −31 to 39 HU). Also no significant difference was found between observers in the measurement of high density ratio (Mean difference of 0.5% with a 95% CI of −2 to 3). Bland–Altman plot of pulmonary attenuation densities and high attenuation volumes are given in Figs. 1A and B.
Fig. 1

Bland–Altman plot of interobserver variability in the assessment of A: pulmonary attenuation density and B: high pulmonary density ratio.

The subjective level of GGO

CT data sets from 367 patients with acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction were analysed. No GGO was present in 292 patients mild-moderate GGO was found in 65 patients, and severe GGO in 10 patients. This categorization correlated with increasing mean pulmonary attenuation density and mean high pulmonary density ratio (Figs. 2A and B).
Fig. 2

Pulmonary attenuation density [in Hounsfield Units (HU)] and the high pulmonary attenuation density ratio [%], according to the visual assessment of ground-glass opacification (GGO). *p<0.001.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Coronary computed tomography angiography data sets were acquired before invasive treatment from 367 patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [1], [2], [3]. From these datasets the subjective level of GGO was evaluated by an experienced radiologist on a 3 point scale (no GGO, mild-moderate GGO, and severe GGO) to compare with quantitative metrics of lung water (pulmonary attenuation density). The pulmonary attenuation density and the high pulmonary density ratio was obtained using pulmonary densitometry in the following way: Full view images in 3 mm slice thickness were loaded into the workstation (Vitrea, version 6.2, Vital, Minnesota) using the pulmonary density analysis tool, which automatically traced the part of the left and right lung within the scan field (Fig. 3A). Voxels with attenuation densities above –300 (water, contrast, and soft tissue) was subtracted from the images in the further analysis. Mean attenuation density and attenuation density histograms were assessed (Fig. 3B). An attenuation density of −720 HU was chosen as a threshold for high pulmonary attenuation density (Three standard deviations above mean from a previous study) [4]. The volume of the lung with attenuation density > −720 defined the high pulmonary density volume and the high pulmonary density ratio was assessed as: high pulmonary density volume / total measured lung tissue volume, in %.
Fig. 3

How to perform quantitative assessment of Ground-glass opacification (A) The software performs automated segmentation of pulmonary tissue adjacent to the heart. (B) An example of a histogram of the relative frequency of HU values of the automated lung segmentation (excluding all values above −300 HU) shows the percentage of lung tissue with high pulmonary attenuation density > −720 HU (= high pulmonary density ratio) in blue color. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).

Comparison between groups of subjective levels of GGO was tested using one way ANOVA. Interobserver variability in the assessment of lung water was evaluated using the Bland–Altman method [5].
Subject areaClinical Medicine
More specific subject areaPulmonary tissue. Lung water. Ground-glass opacification. Interobserver variability
Type of dataImage, graph
How data was acquiredComputed Tomography angiography.
Data formatAnalyzed
Experimental factorsThe samples were from patients with acute myocardial infarction before invasive treatment was performed. After sampling data was analyzed using semi-automated commercially available software.
Experimental featuresPulmonary attenuation density was assessed as a measure of lung water. Interobserver variability and relation to patterns of ground-glass opacification.
Data source locationCopenhagen, Denmark ( 55.6960°N, 12.5666°E)
Data accessibilityData is with this article
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of standard- and low-radiation-dose CT for quantification of emphysema.

Authors:  David S Gierada; Thomas K Pilgram; Bruce R Whiting; Cheng Hong; Andrew J Bierhals; Jin Hwan Kim; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Clinical and prognostic correlates of pulmonary congestion in coronary computed tomography angiography data sets.

Authors:  J Tobias Kühl; Thomas S Kristensen; Anna F Thomsen; Louise Hindsø; Kristoffer L Hansen; Olav W Nielsen; Henning Kelbæk; Klaus F Kofoed
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2016-09-15

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The Transmural Extent and Severity of Myocardial Hypoperfusion Predicts Long-Term Outcome in NSTEMI: An MDCT Study.

Authors:  J Tobias Kühl; Jesper J Linde; Lars Køber; Henning Kelbæk; Klaus F Kofoed
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-05-14

5.  Coronary CT angiography in clinical triage of patients at high risk of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J Tobias Kühl; Jens D Hove; Thomas S Kristensen; Jakob B Norsk; Thomas Engstrøm; Lars Køber; Henning Kelbæk; Klaus F Kofoed
Journal:  Scand Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.589

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.