Literature DB >> 27942487

Long-term results after robotically assisted coronary bypass surgery.

Johannes Bonatti1, Jehad Ramahi2, Faisal Hasan2, Ahmad Edris2, Thomas Bartel2, Ravi Nair3, Murat Tuzcu1, Rakesh Suri1, Tomislav Mihaljevic1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotically-assisted coronary bypass grafting (CABG) was introduced in 1998 and dedicated centers have continuously applied and developed this minimally invasive method of coronary bypass surgery. While short-term results are relatively well published, data on long-term outcome are limited. In this literature review, we assessed the outcomes after robotic CABG following the first postoperative year.
METHODS: We searched PubMed for articles containing the terms "robotic" or "robotically assisted" and "coronary bypass". A total of 11 papers contained long-term results. We specifically investigated survival, graft patency, freedom from angina and re-intervention, as well as freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).
RESULTS: Five-year survival after robotic CABG was consistently consistently greater than 90% and graft patency between 3 and 5 years was reported to be above 90%. Fifteen percent to 26% of patients re-experienced angina at 3 to 5 years postoperatively. Long-term freedom from re-intervention reached the range and the 5-year freedom from MACCE rate was approximately 75%.
CONCLUSIONS: According to data in the literature, long-term results after CABG carried out with the assistance of a surgical robot appear to be in line with results achieved after conventional CABG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; coronary artery bypass grafting; long-term results; robotic surgery

Year:  2016        PMID: 27942487      PMCID: PMC5135552          DOI: 10.21037/acs.2016.11.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 2225-319X


  19 in total

1.  Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial.

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; Andrew T L Ong; Lex A van Herwerden; J Eduardo Sousa; Adib Jatene; Johannes J R M Bonnier; Jacques P M A Schönberger; Nigel Buller; Robert Bonser; Clemens Disco; Bianca Backx; Paul G Hugenholtz; Brian G Firth; Felix Unger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: a word of caution implicated by a five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Utz Kappert; Sems-Malte Tugtekin; Romuald Cichon; Martin Braun; Klaus Matschke
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Surgical revascularization techniques that minimize surgical risk and maximize late survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Sajjad Raza; Joseph F Sabik; Khalil Masabni; Ponnuthurai Ainkaran; Bruce W Lytle; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial.

Authors:  Friedrich W Mohr; Marie-Claude Morice; A Pieter Kappetein; Ted E Feldman; Elisabeth Ståhle; Antonio Colombo; Michael J Mack; David R Holmes; Marie-angèle Morel; Nic Van Dyck; Vicki M Houle; Keith D Dawkins; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years.

Authors:  G M Fitzgibbon; H P Kafka; A J Leach; W J Keon; G D Hooper; J R Burton
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Comparison of medicine alone, coronary angioplasty, and left internal mammary artery-coronary artery bypass for one-vessel proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A B Greenbaum; R M Califf; R H Jones; L H Gardner; H R Phillips; M H Sketch; R S Stack; J A Puma
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Beating heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  Sudhir Srivastava; Suresh Gadasalli; Madhava Agusala; Ram Kolluru; Reyna Barrera; Shaune Quismundo; Usha Kreaden; Valluvan Jeevanandam
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Robotic Total Arterial Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Seven-Year Single-Center Experience and Long-Term Follow-Up of Graft Patency.

Authors:  Ming Yang; Yang Wu; Gang Wang; Cangsong Xiao; Huajun Zhang; Changqing Gao
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Robotically-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Thierry A Folliguet; Alain Dibie; François Philippe; Fabrice Larrazet; Michel S Slama; François Laborde
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 1.866

10.  Hybrid coronary revascularization using robotic totally endoscopic surgery: perioperative outcomes and 5-year results.

Authors:  Johannes O Bonatti; David Zimrin; Eric J Lehr; Mark Vesely; Zachary N Kon; Brody Wehman; Andreas R de Biasi; Benedikt Hofauer; Felix Weidinger; Thomas Schachner; Nikolaos Bonaros; Guy Friedrich
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  5 in total

1.  Long-term results of robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting with composite arterial grafts for multiple coronary anastomoses: 10-year experience.

Authors:  Chung-Yu Lo; Chu-Leng Yu; Yen Chang; Hao-Ji Wei
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-03-22

2.  The Year in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia: Selected Highlights from 2019.

Authors:  Adam S Evans; Menachem M Weiner; Shahzad Shaefi; Prakash A Patel; Matthew M Townsley; Abirami Kumaresan; Jared W Feinman; Ashley V Fritz; Archer K Martin; Toby B Steinberg; J Ross Renew; Jane L Gui; Brian Radvansky; Himani Bhatt; Sudhakar Subramani; Archit Sharma; Jacob T Gutsche; John G Augoustides; Harish Ramakrishna
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Risk factor analysis and management strategies of operating room-related infections after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Lifen Pan; Shufang Tan; Linlan Cao; Xiaoling Feng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Eleven-year outcomes of U-clips in totally robotic coronary artery bypass grafting versus standard hand-sewn running suture in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Nan Cheng; Huajun Zhang; Ming Yang; Guopeng Liu; Yi Guo; Wenbin Kang; Changqing Gao; Rong Wang
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-28

5.  Vascular restenosis in coronary artery bypass grafting might be associated with VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Zuzanna Podemska-Jedrzejczak; Agnieszka Malinska; Patrycja Sujka-Kordowska; Michal Nowicki; Mateusz Puslecki; Marek Jemielity; Bartlomiej Perek
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.037

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.