| Literature DB >> 27942406 |
Gilbert Massard1, Stéphane Renaud2, Jérémie Reeb1, Nicola Santelmo3, Anne Olland1, Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz3.
Abstract
Management of stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer is still matter of ongoing controversy. The debate is flawed by the heterogeneity of this group of patients, lack of strong evidence from controlled trials, diverging treatment strategies, and hesitating estimation of prognosis. Surgery is credited a survival advantage in a trimodality setting. For many teams, N2 is by principle managed with induction chemotherapy, followed by surgery if the patient is down-staged. However, surgery remains a suitable option even in case of persistent N2. On the other hand, outcomes are comparable, regardless whether chemotherapy has been given as induction or adjuvant treatment. Hence, upfront surgery without invasive staging, followed by adjuvant therapies, appears reasonable in resectable single station N2 disease, simplifying patient care and reducing cost. We expect that molecular biomarkers will improve estimation of prognosis and patient selection in the future.Entities:
Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer; multimodality treatment; stage IIIA-N2; surgery
Year: 2016 PMID: 27942406 PMCID: PMC5124592 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.09.34
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thorac Dis ISSN: 2072-1439 Impact factor: 2.895