OBJECTIVE: Induction therapy is often recommended for patients with clinical stage IIIA-N2 (cIIIA/pN2) lung cancer. We examined whether postinduction positron emission tomography (PET) scans were associated with ypN2 disease and survival of patients with cIIIA/pN2 disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database to identify patients with cIIIA/pN2 non-small cell lung cancer treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery between January 2007 and December 2012. The primary aim was the association between postinduction PET avidity and ypN2 status; the secondary aims were overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence. RESULTS: Persistent pathologic N2 disease was present in 61% of patients (61 out of 100). PET N2-negative disease increased from 7% (6 out of 92) before induction therapy to 47% (36 out of 77) afterward. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of postinduction PET for identification of ypN2 disease were 59%, 55%, and 57%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis indicated that postinduction PET N2 status was not associated with ypN2 disease. Of the 39 patients with both pre- and postinduction PET N2-avidity, 25 (64%) had ypN2 disease. The 5-year overall survival was 40% for ypN2 disease versus 38% for N2-persistent disease (P = .936); the 5-year overall survival was 43% for postinduction PET N2-negative disease versus 39% for N2-avid disease (P = .251). The 5-year disease-free survival was 34% for ypN2-negative disease versus 9% for N2-persistent disease (P = .079). CONCLUSIONS: Postinduction PET avidity for N2 nodes is not associated with ypN2 disease, overall survival, or disease-free survival in patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for stage IIIA/pN2 disease.
OBJECTIVE: Induction therapy is often recommended for patients with clinical stage IIIA-N2 (cIIIA/pN2) lung cancer. We examined whether postinduction positron emission tomography (PET) scans were associated with ypN2 disease and survival of patients with cIIIA/pN2 disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database to identify patients with cIIIA/pN2non-small cell lung cancer treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery between January 2007 and December 2012. The primary aim was the association between postinduction PET avidity and ypN2 status; the secondary aims were overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence. RESULTS: Persistent pathologic N2 disease was present in 61% of patients (61 out of 100). PET N2-negative disease increased from 7% (6 out of 92) before induction therapy to 47% (36 out of 77) afterward. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of postinduction PET for identification of ypN2 disease were 59%, 55%, and 57%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis indicated that postinduction PET N2 status was not associated with ypN2 disease. Of the 39 patients with both pre- and postinduction PET N2-avidity, 25 (64%) had ypN2 disease. The 5-year overall survival was 40% for ypN2 disease versus 38% for N2-persistent disease (P = .936); the 5-year overall survival was 43% for postinduction PET N2-negative disease versus 39% for N2-avid disease (P = .251). The 5-year disease-free survival was 34% for ypN2-negative disease versus 9% for N2-persistent disease (P = .079). CONCLUSIONS: Postinduction PET avidity for N2 nodes is not associated with ypN2 disease, overall survival, or disease-free survival in patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for stage IIIA/pN2 disease.
Authors: Michael T Jaklitsch; James E Herndon; Malcolm M DeCamp; William G Richards; Parvesh Kumar; Mark J Krasna; Mark R Green; David J Sugarbaker Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: J A Roth; E N Atkinson; F Fossella; R Komaki; M Bernadette Ryan; J B Putnam; J S Lee; H Dhingra; L De Caro; M Chasen; W K Hong Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Corneline J Hoekstra; Sigrid G Stroobants; Egbert F Smit; Johan Vansteenkiste; Harm van Tinteren; Pieter E Postmus; Richard P Golding; Bonne Biesma; Frans J H M Schramel; Nico van Zandwijk; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Otto S Hoekstra Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-11-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jan P van Meerbeeck; Gijs W P M Kramer; Paul E Y Van Schil; Catherine Legrand; Egbert F Smit; Franz Schramel; Vivianne C Tjan-Heijnen; Bonne Biesma; Channa Debruyne; Nico van Zandwijk; Ted A W Splinter; Giuseppe Giaccone Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2007-03-21 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Paul De Leyn; Sigrid Stroobants; Walter De Wever; Toni Lerut; Willy Coosemans; Georges Decker; Philippe Nafteux; Dirk Van Raemdonck; Luc Mortelmans; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Johan Vansteenkiste Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K S Albain; V W Rusch; J J Crowley; T W Rice; A T Turrisi; J K Weick; V A Lonchyna; C A Presant; R J McKenna; D R Gandara Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D C Betticher; S-F Hsu Schmitz; M Tötsch; E Hansen; C Joss; C von Briel; R A Schmid; M Pless; J Habicht; A D Roth; A Spiliopoulos; R Stahel; W Weder; R Stupp; F Egli; M Furrer; H Honegger; M Wernli; T Cerny; H-B Ris Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2006-04-24 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Gaetano Rocco; Katie Nason; Alex Brunelli; Gonzalo Varela; Thomas Waddell; David R Jones Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Whitney S Brandt; Wanpu Yan; Jonathan E Leeman; Kay See Tan; Bernard J Park; Prasad S Adusumilli; Matthew J Bott; Daniela Molena; James Isbell; Jamie Chaft; Andreas Rimner; David R Jones Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2018-05-26 Impact factor: 4.330